Bitcoin was initially designed to serve as a currency for tangible things, such as commodities, and therefore as a store of value against monetary/fiat inflation thereof. This chart stimulates a question: Is Bitcoin undervalued vis a vis tangible commodities, because if it's own designation as a commodity?
Were Bitcoin not designated as a taxable commodity and permitted to function as it was originally designed to - as an alternative currency - would we be seeing a different chart here, a stronger chart, where in fact it rose with commodity prices, rather than getting hit twice by commodity price rise and money supply rise?