Bitcoin. P-Modeling Pt 32. Algorithm Failure?
Updated
Nope... not yet at least.. :). But we did test the most outer limits of my subjectively designed algorithm for hours though. I was so sure it would fail, that when it was on the death line I turned off my phone and computer and went outside to enjoy the fresh air and ponder what I would do next. Algorithm failure is no joke now. I have so many days of continuous modeling in this algorithm sequence that it is hard to think of starting over from step one again. But if it is meant to be it will be and i will accept it. Failure is a means of an opportunity for growth. Insanity, is doing the same thing over expecting a different result. We adapt our perceptional understanding to new information or we resist and fail victim to a variety of unhealthy emotions and habits. A dynamic perspective of life is needed to understand what I am doing here. If you are bound by the norms of our social reality and fail to think out of the box you will not see the connection. That is ok too.. My understanding of reality is no better than yours, nor is your understanding of reality better than mine. That understanding is unique to the one perceiving and can not be compared. But we do it anyways.. :) Humans can not help it unfortunately. Anywhooo..
The 8/1 Gann Fan Boundary represented algorithm failure. It was widely documented through out our journey..
We did indeed hit that line and passed it. Technically running outside the modeled limits, but not quite straying far from that 8/1 boundary line. We are literally tip-toeing death right now. In my eyes it has not failed until we have a big drop with no chance of possible return to the modeling boundary. We are so close to that line that error rate attributed to subjective boundary placement can be accounted for here. That line is valid, and so is the algorithm as long as it is being followed closely like it has been. Battles
So many pieces of the puzzle have been fitting together over the last couple months.. what started as a joke to me 3.22.18 has turned into something that is very much not a joke anymore. But a real possibility of being something unique to contribute to this ever evolving world we live in. We are headed towards a paradigm shift with crpytocurrency and it being mass adopted. The old methods of understanding this new phenomena will not be enough. People need to continue thinking outside the mainstream box.
Review
One thing you should understand is that what I am doing is new. It is Theoretical. Thus being it is theoretical, take it with a grain of salt.
I am certain i have found validity in what I am doing, so I will keep doing it. Despite any failures, or incorrect calls, or emotional builds ups only leading to disappointment. Is that not the fun of it? I found this stuff ultra fun and it works a good portion of the time it seems. But I am only human.. Humans make mistakes.
When rendering a model in my algorithm, the proposition that upholds the belief theory is subjective to a degree. I chose the best place I THINK it would go. Period. I follow the geometry as I see it in my eyes. That is subjective. No A.I. in crypyto trading has the ability to have subjectivity. But I do. No A.I algorithm created has subjectivity, unless it is a hybrid that incorporates HUMANS into it's analysis. The human operator is the most important aspect in understanding the real complex nature of human emotion and its interplay in something like crypto trading; as all bots programmed to trade (are based on emotions, and desires of the HUMAN programmer). Thus bots although automatic, ooze the emotional desires of the human programmer. An observable behavioral phenomena, to the train eyed.
The only way you can learn about my technique is to watch what i am doing. YOU WILL FIND THIS NOWHERE ELSE. As this is designed from scratch based off other research I am working on in my professional domain. This is a grand experiment, I thank you for all participating with me!
Thanks for looking,
Glitch420
The 8/1 Gann Fan Boundary represented algorithm failure. It was widely documented through out our journey..
We did indeed hit that line and passed it. Technically running outside the modeled limits, but not quite straying far from that 8/1 boundary line. We are literally tip-toeing death right now. In my eyes it has not failed until we have a big drop with no chance of possible return to the modeling boundary. We are so close to that line that error rate attributed to subjective boundary placement can be accounted for here. That line is valid, and so is the algorithm as long as it is being followed closely like it has been. Battles
So many pieces of the puzzle have been fitting together over the last couple months.. what started as a joke to me 3.22.18 has turned into something that is very much not a joke anymore. But a real possibility of being something unique to contribute to this ever evolving world we live in. We are headed towards a paradigm shift with crpytocurrency and it being mass adopted. The old methods of understanding this new phenomena will not be enough. People need to continue thinking outside the mainstream box.
Review
One thing you should understand is that what I am doing is new. It is Theoretical. Thus being it is theoretical, take it with a grain of salt.
I am certain i have found validity in what I am doing, so I will keep doing it. Despite any failures, or incorrect calls, or emotional builds ups only leading to disappointment. Is that not the fun of it? I found this stuff ultra fun and it works a good portion of the time it seems. But I am only human.. Humans make mistakes.
When rendering a model in my algorithm, the proposition that upholds the belief theory is subjective to a degree. I chose the best place I THINK it would go. Period. I follow the geometry as I see it in my eyes. That is subjective. No A.I. in crypyto trading has the ability to have subjectivity. But I do. No A.I algorithm created has subjectivity, unless it is a hybrid that incorporates HUMANS into it's analysis. The human operator is the most important aspect in understanding the real complex nature of human emotion and its interplay in something like crypto trading; as all bots programmed to trade (are based on emotions, and desires of the HUMAN programmer). Thus bots although automatic, ooze the emotional desires of the human programmer. An observable behavioral phenomena, to the train eyed.
The only way you can learn about my technique is to watch what i am doing. YOU WILL FIND THIS NOWHERE ELSE. As this is designed from scratch based off other research I am working on in my professional domain. This is a grand experiment, I thank you for all participating with me!
Thanks for looking,
Glitch420
Note
A closer view of the action. Note
5 minute view. Note
Tip toe. Tip toe.. Flirting with death has never been so safe and fun at the same time. No one can get hurt except a metaphysical entity controlling the operators in non-physical reality. muahahha..
Note
Locked and loaded.. Note
Oh bitcoin.. You never cease to amaze me.. Now just 19.7% more boost please so we can ready ourselves out of the danger zone.. That would be nice...Note
wow was that close... we almost failed. kinda upset it did not fail yet... It was so close.. it dipped past the death line.. but refused to stay down.. now it is squarely back into modeling territory.. how.. why?.. can it be?Note
Wow. talk about a double dose of heart attack for me lol..For a second time i thought we were donezo..
But miraculously we bounced right back! Well look at that shit..
Note
That 8/1 gann fan boundary line is holding like a boss. If you notice there is a gradual incline with that line, but we have held it pretty much the entire day!
I call that a true ass boundary line.. and holding it's own for that matter..
Note
Well this is unfortunate.. Last night while i slept. We dipped outside the 8/1 gann fan boundary line.
This is a big problem. We are at the point of imminent algorithm falilure. One good drop rendering this trend unable to re-enter the modeling limits. Will be an official nail in the coffin.
The sentry has us firmly in its grasp and is dragging us down. The new evil operator is positioning itself to take control.. The Master operator (where we want to be) is losing control very quickly..
We must re-enter the modeling limits and blast like a fucking supernova. There is no other choice. except failure of course....and this extremely possible at this time. 98% of failure (since we are in critical failure now) 2% is we hit insane supernovas..
has the time finally come for this algorithm to be done? I guess we will find out today..
I created a new 1 day window at 20% increase. This is a start. We are still firmly in the red even with a 20% increase.. Odds are not for us right now. That is clear.
Note
All red caution signs are places you should be looking.. That red boundary is VITAL.
WE MUST RE-ENTER IT.
Or this algorithm is over and we start a new sequence.
Note
Bitcoin will test 10,000 today.If we get rejected today... we are fucked.
If we pass 10,000 today.. 11,500 will come very fast. Followed by 12,800.
End of May is my global algorithm target of 15,000 followed by a 85 degree vertical drop to 11,000
Algorithm has stayed true since we landed in the Bitcoin to C trend zone. We must re-enter the red 8/1 gann fann line and blast upward violently if my algorithm is to stay true..
This is for all the marbles right now.. Yesterday i did not post because i wanted to see what it would do. Yesterday we spent the ENTIRE day in outer space.. Outer space is the space OUTSIDE the algorithm modeling limits.. Technically this constitutes as algorithm failure.. Until i noticed that the drop landed us into, "bitcoin to C". Bitcoin to C was my original idea that started this whole sequence from 3.22.18. Bitcoin to C is a huge deal in my algorithm. It was the goal for the last almost 40 days of continuous modeling. Our massive drop outside the algorithm limits landed perfectly in the bitcoin to C trend zone. We bounced between this zone multiple times and have officially bounced back upwards heading back into the "algorithm modeling territory". Currently at 9,318.
Being a dynamic theoretical model that is designed by scratch. The rules are not written. I am written them as we go. Each new rule has to be validated throughout the algorithm to stay true. You can not just make up rules without validation of the proposition of the belief.
Hitting Bitcoin to C trend zone means it was a calculated drop meant for more accumulation before we break the 10k barrier. I can not just ignore this just for the sake of saying we went outside the algorithm modeling limits and now we must fail the algorithm. That is not how it works in my eyes. The drop that would of failed this algorithm is the one that puts us and keeps us below the Bitcoin to C threshold zone. ( Green parallel lines).
Today is decision day. Lots of posts.
Note
The phoenix rises from the ashes. Reborn and ready to take flight.. Like a violent firestorm it burns brightly under the night sky. Cascading from its earthly figure; fire and hope accumulate into the wounds of the past. Healing and readying for cataclysmic reaction. But for now we wait just a little more.. Note
The phoenix rises today. Making new idea later. super busy today. sorry for lack of updates.Note
quick update. Note
Note
Algorthim sequence has failed. Evil operator has taken control of the sentry. Master operator has completely loss its control.. Evil operator is in full control now.. This looks really bad.. Not good.. I am designing my new algorithm sequence based off of the old algorithm sequence .. New sequence will be posted soon. I have a lot of explaining to do. It may take me awhile to figure this out.. Being the first time I have failed in 40+ days since starting this project.. I will be working on this all day. The belief theory upholding my prediction proposition will be slightly altered to account for new changes. Thank you for your patience.
Note
New idea being made soon.. I need to explain stuff before i move forward and what happened. Here is a glimpse of next upcoming idea. Last post on this thread. 
Related publications
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.