Over a month later, the fractal is still spot on. Had to adjust the time a bit, but the idea that experimenting with fractals to give an idea of what could possibly happen in the future is like "reading tealeaves" as one comment suggests is silly. The purpose of TA isn't to scientifically determine exactly what will happen, it is to give traders tools to INCREASE their PROBABILITY of making accurate calls. I don't know how you could look at this chart and not, at the very least, acknowledge that the fractal is remarkably similar and has been a useful tool over the last couple months to help figure out where the market might go.
Fundamentals are certainly different now than in 2014, but when you start trying to rationalize or explain what you see on your charts using fundamentals, you dilute your TA and create a useless hodgepodge of analysis that tries to guess the weight that TA and fundamentals should each play. Instead, I like to purely trade the charts and assume that all fundamentals are already factored into them.