-Yurlo
Please HIT the like button if these visuals interest you 👍
Fibonacci levels:
0 (3102)
0.236 (7064)
0.382 (9515
0.5 (11497
0.618 (13478
0.786 (16298
1 (19891)
Fibonacci conclusion according to TA ~
#1: rejected 0.5 (11497) after topping out just under (12500)
#2: should retest 0.382 (9515) according to fibonacci's fundamentals
Moving averages:
20 (10045)
50 (9147)
100 (8245)
200 (6297)
Moving averages conclusions according to TA ~
#1: still need to test 20 day moving average (10045) & that's the most bullish scenario
#2: all 4 moving averages are underneath ~ liquidity is usually in opposite direction of trend
#3: if we hit the 100 day moving average (which is just under a support level (9200) ~ this would confirm cme gap needed to be filled
(this is my last post until we either break $9950 or fuckery plays out, cheers)
Please HIT the like button if these visuals interest you 👍
Fibonacci levels:
0 (3102)
0.236 (7064)
0.382 (9515
0.5 (11497
0.618 (13478
0.786 (16298
1 (19891)
Fibonacci conclusion according to TA ~
#1: rejected 0.5 (11497) after topping out just under (12500)
#2: should retest 0.382 (9515) according to fibonacci's fundamentals
Moving averages:
20 (10045)
50 (9147)
100 (8245)
200 (6297)
Moving averages conclusions according to TA ~
#1: still need to test 20 day moving average (10045) & that's the most bullish scenario
#2: all 4 moving averages are underneath ~ liquidity is usually in opposite direction of trend
#3: if we hit the 100 day moving average (which is just under a support level (9200) ~ this would confirm cme gap needed to be filled
(this is my last post until we either break $9950 or fuckery plays out, cheers)
Trade active
The
SPX weekly chart looks like it's about to have a death cross on the oscillator ~
Trade active
Trade active
Trade active
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.