P2/2
Some questions:
1) Out of all of crypto, why are the United Nations not creating their own crypto as a means of payment?
>> Is it because they have personal interest by already having a stake beforehand? I.e., are they securing by means of power and control crypto?
>> Is it to enrich/insure the crooks that own most of crypto? Study the history of bitcoin, who owns what, how was price manipulated at the very start and by who and it goes beyond mtgox or now binance. Normal people or entrepreneurs do net set up structures like finex/tether did as shown in the Panama papers. It requires a lot of powerful connections.
>> Now it even feels more like a pyramid scheme from the get go.
2) How can a hard capped currency be any good for future generations, aka children you claim to help worldwide, when the rich save while the very poor have to give it away, furthering the wealth of the very rich. It's the ANTITHESIS of EQUALITY. Why so hypocritical? Why you introduce something completely 180* of the stance of the United Nations motto, vision and mission?!
It does NOT take a rocket scientist to UNDERSTAND and KNOW those things I'm speaking of, that is, if you use COMMON SENSE. If everything is energy and more people come in the world => more energy required, then why you use and promote ponzi/pyramid schemes that are are contracting instead of expanding?! The deflationary nature of crypto you own means working people are assured PEASANT STATUS (as in medevil time) in the future, instead of having their basic meets met.
3) Why are you not converting it to fiat? Are you investors or are you using your undemocratic powers to force the crypto you have as legal tender in the future? This godcomplex is typical for aquarians, thinking they know better how other people should live, while their own house is a mess. Guess what, you won't transcend anything and make it worse for your own in the future. Think less, feel more and you relate with your fellow human beings.
I've no problem with crypto being used as money or legal tender in the future. I do have problems with people who are dishonest, liars/manipulators, thieves and people who control others, especially when it's against their will.
So then, this implies something to be done with the illicit hodling of funds, no? I'm talking about criminals and exchanges. Yeah, that's right, I guess it's a big no to that rhetorical question.
Well, I learned something from this. I was right for all those years on my initial thought which was strong, but rationalized it wasn't so, because of peer pressure, despite feelings as well. Now I know, groupthink is dangerous af and one should be in solitude to see and think clearly, otherwise disappointment is a reality not far fetched and oh boy, I'm disappointed. /rant