Wave 1 was roughly 10x, subwave count provided in orange numbers
Wave 2 wave was long complex correction
Wave 3 was roughly 7x, smaller than wave 1
Wave 4 looks like 335 expanded flat.
Wave 5 in progress ?
As you can see wave 4 fits perfectly with alteration rule because wave 2 corrective wave was a long complex correction. But wave 4 was flat correction. Wave 4 usually finish in the subwave 4 area region of major wave 3. We have same and confluence of fib .23 spot on.
For wave 5 target projection I have applied Trend Based Fibb extension from start of Major wave 1 to the top of wave 3 and down to the end of wave 4. Target below the .38.
Expecting wave 5 to be the shortest because wave 3 was shorter than wave 1 and wave 3 cant be the shortest as per Elliot rule.