Trading Ideas Results for March-April
This year I started sharing my analytical reviews and trading ideas since mid-March. I like using TradingView because here you can't edit or delete a published idea. Everything that has been published can be found and verified, which is not always possible on other platforms, for example, in Telegram channels where the administrator can adjust the statistics.
It's time to summarize the interim results of trading ideas from mid-March to April 30. In this review, I will only consider short-term ideas on the daily and hourly timeframes. Medium-term ideas on the weekly and daily timeframes will be analyzed in a separate review.
There were 4 short-term ideas. All of them are on the chart attached to this post. One for buying and three for selling. The results are also visible on the chart, and they are 100%, all targets were achieved. You can find more details about the ideas by following the links below (see related ideas). But was everything so good? Unfortunately, no, if we look more closely at how the price moved in each idea.
For AVAX, the selling time was chosen perfectly. Without any drawdown (2%), the price reached the target: +29%.
For ETH, I waited for the price to return to the range of 3200-3400 for buying, the drawdown after buying reached up to 3%, and the achieved target was +12%.
For SOL, the idea was to sell, and the drawdown on the trade reached up to half of the target (4%), but then the target was achieved with a gain of +11%.
For ORDI, a less favorable moment was chosen for selling compared to other ideas, resulting in a drawdown of 23%, which is comparable to the achieved final target of +24%.
It is worth noting that ORDI's market capitalization is 15 times smaller than AVAX's. Could this be the difference? What is an acceptable drawdown percentage for you before the idea works out? Share your thoughts in the comments.
By the way, as part of the educational article on March 31, I made a short-term forecast for OPUSDT. Interestingly, it also worked out. Without any drawdown, the target was achieved: +29%.
I will publish the interim results of medium-term ideas in a separate review.
It's time to summarize the interim results of trading ideas from mid-March to April 30. In this review, I will only consider short-term ideas on the daily and hourly timeframes. Medium-term ideas on the weekly and daily timeframes will be analyzed in a separate review.
There were 4 short-term ideas. All of them are on the chart attached to this post. One for buying and three for selling. The results are also visible on the chart, and they are 100%, all targets were achieved. You can find more details about the ideas by following the links below (see related ideas). But was everything so good? Unfortunately, no, if we look more closely at how the price moved in each idea.
For AVAX, the selling time was chosen perfectly. Without any drawdown (2%), the price reached the target: +29%.
For ETH, I waited for the price to return to the range of 3200-3400 for buying, the drawdown after buying reached up to 3%, and the achieved target was +12%.
For SOL, the idea was to sell, and the drawdown on the trade reached up to half of the target (4%), but then the target was achieved with a gain of +11%.
For ORDI, a less favorable moment was chosen for selling compared to other ideas, resulting in a drawdown of 23%, which is comparable to the achieved final target of +24%.
It is worth noting that ORDI's market capitalization is 15 times smaller than AVAX's. Could this be the difference? What is an acceptable drawdown percentage for you before the idea works out? Share your thoughts in the comments.
By the way, as part of the educational article on March 31, I made a short-term forecast for OPUSDT. Interestingly, it also worked out. Without any drawdown, the target was achieved: +29%.
I will publish the interim results of medium-term ideas in a separate review.
Good luck with your trading!
t.me/user_friendly_trading
t.me/user_friendly_trading
Related publications
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.