Topics:
MOASS: 06/09 - 07/09
Good trading to you all!
- Market Uncertainty
- GME Price Structure
- Near Term Targets
- 28 Level & GME Structure
- Quick Indicator Review
- SPX & Markets
- The Cats Tweets
MOASS: 06/09 - 07/09
Good trading to you all!
Note
Zooming out we see price respected the support areaAt this point to me its crystal clear that the weakness we've seen in GME is not due to a change in GME investor sentiment..this is simply GME being dragged along with broader MARKET sentiment
Or as I have continually said..when the market finds it legs- GME will too
Note
Everyone pay attention to the shares borrowed overnight over the next two daysIm almost positive you are going to see 300k-400k or more borrowed ahead of Friday close
Max Pain, while not always as insidious as you think (yall should really look into understanding GEX and its relation to Theta) it will absolutely matter to them this week..and the rest of this month
These crooks are going to be really blatant going forward..even more so than usual
Note
I dont typically show the weekly chart but something caught my attentionThe Blue lines are projecting something to happen next summer as well..not sure what that means..yet
Of course this changes nothing about whats going to happen THIS summer
Just calling out that GME may run a bit next summer as well
And if it the price structure is bullish I will jump back in again...shorts are going to absolutely hate me when this is over lol
MOASS: 06/09 - 07/09
Note
BTW- did you see the sheer amount of shares borrowed overnight and again this morning? "They" are trying to capitalize on short term market weakness for sure
And I almost positive this has something to do with ETF rebalancing..specifically XRT
XRT to me is the biggest smoking gun in all of this (other than the CAT Errors) and if the Regulators truly gave a damn they would start right there.
Note
When SPX finds it bottom expect an AGGRESIVE move to the upside...and expect the same from GMEYou will see why im talking so confident by this time next week
Like I said, as far as I can see...ITS TIME
MOASS: 06/09 - 07/09
Note
Reckoning...but you know the quoteI have time today and I cant wait for you to see whats coming
Note
The stuff im discovering with related to Coordinated Stock Bashing/ Troll Bot Farm ish has me utterly disgusted and furiousThis is RICO level criminality..wow
There is NO WAY the SEC is totally blind to this...
I dont have the main dots connected but where there is freaking smoke there is fire..
I don't know what the SEC plans to do about this stuff but I know what I'm going to do...
I"M GOING TO DO IT MYSELF
MOASS Freaking 06/09 - 07/09
Lets Go!!!
Note
BTW these crooks think " 6 degrees of separation" is going to save themLike I said in the comments, every time these paint sniffing river sh*tting Trolls post they leave itsy bitsy breadcrumbs behind...
Yall are getting sloppy and boy is there going to be a reckoning
Note
Hey Crooks and especially the TROLLS I have another message for you:Ready for Sector 5 to make the news AGAIN?
Note
Ands thats a wrap!Boy am I pissed hahaha
Not at the price or price action...there is nothing unusual about the macro structure...Elliott Wave 101 stuff..and yes we are definitely about to RUN
I'm pissed at the sheer amount of cheating that i'm uncovering (as I watch them literally try to slam the close which is you guessed it: ILLEGAL)
I'm on a mission at this point to do my part to bring these shitty hedge funds chop shops to their knees
BTW- Citadel is at the BULLSEYE center of this B.S. but from the internalization/order book manipulation side of things...but we already knew that lol..(I have pretty solid evidence of them manipulating price thru internalization)
MOASS: 06/09 - 07/09
Note
Here is a peek at some of the stuff im including in my SEC submission. This comes Citadels OWN data:Case Study 1: September 10, 2024
FTD Data: 261,236 FTDs at $23.45; notional value of $6.1M; FTD increase of +224,518 from the previous day.
Citadel Data: Heavy internalization of orders.
Price Movement:
Before Price (Sep 9, 2024): $24.25
After Price (Sep 11, 2024): $23.05
Change: –$1.20, which is approximately –4.94%.
Analysis: A large spike in FTDs coinciding with heavy internalization suggests that short sellers may be offloading shares they never borrowed (naked shorting). The nearly 5% drop in price reflects potential artificial pressure on GME.
Case Study 2: July 19, 2024
FTD Data: 178,191 FTDs at $24.97; notional value of $4.4M; FTD increase of +169,025 shares.
Citadel Data: Significant internalization (over 1M shares) with negative realized spreads.
Price Movement:
Before Price (July 18, 2024): $25.88
After Price (July 22, 2024): $24.13
Change: –$1.75, approximately –6.76%.
Analysis: The large FTD increase and negative spreads suggest short sellers might be manipulating the market to force a price drop. The roughly 7% decline over a few days underscores significant downward pressure.
Case Study 3: August 16, 2024
FTD Data: Only 19 FTDs at $22.40.
Citadel Data: Internalized about 1.37M shares (over 70% of trades), with negative realized spreads.
Price Movement:
Before Price (August 15, 2024): $22.53
After Price (August 19, 2024): $22.55
Change: +$0.02, approximately +0.09%.
Analysis: Despite minimal FTD activity, the high internalization rate—even with almost unchanged price—suggests that upward pressure is being dampened. Negative spreads hint at price suppression tactics.
Case Study 4: August 9, 2024
FTD Data: 19,709 FTDs at $21.93; notional value of $432K.
Citadel Data: Substantial internalization observed.
Price Movement:
Before Price (August 8, 2024): $21.75
After Price (August 12, 2024): $22.27
Change: +$0.52, approximately +2.39%.
Analysis: Although the stock eventually increased, the modest gain may have been constrained by internalization. The FTD spike suggests that naked short selling might have been used to cap further upward movement.
Case Study 5: August 6, 2024
FTD Data: 93,816 FTDs at $21.28; notional value of $1.9M; FTD increase of +90,015.
Citadel Data: Heavy internalization with negative spreads.
Price Movement:
Before Price (August 5, 2024): $20.65
After Price (August 7, 2024): $20.83
Change: +$0.18, approximately +0.87%.
Analysis: Despite a large FTD spike, the price barely increased. This muted reaction hints that internalization and potential naked shorting were actively suppressing a natural upward adjustment.
Case Study 6: August 2, 2024
FTD Data: 5,468 FTDs at $21.07; notional value of $115K.
Citadel Data: Increased internalization noted.
Price Movement:
Before Price (August 1, 2024): $21.71
After Price (August 5, 2024): $20.65
Change: –$1.06, approximately –4.88%.
Analysis: A 5% decline in price despite a modest FTD count suggests that heavy internalization and off-exchange trades may have concealed true market demand, artificially depressing the price.
Case Study 7: August 1, 2024
FTD Data: 13,741 FTDs at $21.71; notional value of $298K.
Citadel Data: Large internalization and evidence of delayed execution.
Price Movement:
Before Price (July 31, 2024): $21.50
After Price (August 2, 2024): $21.07
Change: –$0.43, approximately –2.00%.
Analysis: Delayed executions and internalization correlate with a 2% drop in price. The FTD numbers hint that some short sales may have been executed without prompt share delivery, pressuring the price downward.
Case Study 8: July 29, 2024
FTD Data: 3,279 FTDs at $23.60; notional value of $77K.
Citadel Data: High internalization of larger order sizes.
Price Movement:
Before Price (July 26, 2024): $24.13
After Price (July 30, 2024): $23.95
Change: –$0.18, approximately –0.75%.
Analysis: Although the FTD count is low, internalization in larger order buckets suggests that market orders were hidden, leading to a suppressed recovery as reflected in the slight drop.
Case Study 9: August 12, 2024
FTD Data: 92,259 FTDs at $21.88; notional value of $2.0M; FTD increase of +72,550.
Citadel Data: Significant internalization with negative realized spreads.
Price Movement:
Before Price (August 9, 2024): $21.93
After Price (August 13, 2024): $22.27
Change: +$0.34, approximately +1.55%.
Analysis: Even with a sizable FTD spike, the price only modestly increased. This suggests that internalization and potential naked shorting were limiting a larger upward move.
Case Study 10: August 7, 2024
FTD Data: 1,067 FTDs at $20.83; notional value of $22K; FTD change of –92,749.
Citadel Data: Predominantly small orders internalized.
Price Movement:
Before Price (August 6, 2024): $21.28
After Price (August 8, 2024): $21.75
Change: +$0.47, approximately +2.21%.
Analysis: A decrease in FTDs coincided with a 2.2% price rise; however, the heavy internalization of smaller trades suggests that upward price pressure may have been fragmented and delayed, masking a potentially stronger recovery.
Note
One more sneek peak in case the crooks think im BS'ing Percent of Orders Internalized (%)
Internalization rates ranged from 68% to 85%, with higher percentages correlating with larger price suppression.
Internalized orders do not hit the public order book, meaning buy orders do not push the price up, while sell orders exert downward pressure.
Example: (Aug 23, 2024) had 85% internalization alongside an FTD spike of +84,481, contributing to a 2.67% price drop.
Number of Orders at Negative Spreads
Large numbers of orders executed below the NBBO (National Best Bid and Offer) indicate market makers routing orders to dark pools and internalizing them at unfavorable prices.
Example: (Aug 8, 2024) had 7,102 orders at negative spreads, translating to $890,000 in suppressed order flow.
Dollar Impact of Negative Spreads
The $ impact column quantifies how much capital was lost due to negative spread execution.
This suppression prevents natural price discovery, ensuring that even if demand exists, it never reflects in public trading.
Example: (Aug 29, 2024) had $795,000 in negative spread impact, resulting in a 2.29% drop in stock price.
Like i said..im here for a reckoning
Note
Notice I now have Trolls in the comments telling me that my SEC submission won't work and wont get read..and they may be rightBut you know whats funny?
They didn't say the stuff I've been calling out wasn't true :)
Note
SPX should really find some legs above this VPOCOh and for anybody clutching their pearls (aka taken aback) by my rants to the TROLLS..apologies..im done lol
I have been dealing with them in my comments and PM's for well over a year so when I discovered what I discovered recently it made me a little mad..SORRY FOLKS!
Note
WOW..i posted this chart right after inauguration..I fully expected at the time that we would get there within a week or so and look how long it actually took..yeah I was waaaayyyyyy off on the timing...this is a perfect example why short dated options can be so perilous..plz be careful with those contracts folks
Related publications
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.
Related publications
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.