Request for TradingView to Change the Pricing Policy.
I am a premium user of TradingView and absolutely delighted to be one.
However, the problem is that I have realized I am overpaying due to the non-availability of a super-customized pricing plan that aligns with what I actually need from the platform.
As a premium user, I am currently paying for:
8 charts per tab (I only need 4)
25 indicators per chart (I need a maximum of 10)
20,000 historical bars
400 price alerts (which I personally don't use)
400 technical alerts (also unused by me)
50 parallel chart connections (I personally need only 4-5)
No ads
Volume profile (not something I personally need)
Custom timeframes
Custom Range Bars (also not something I personally need)
Multiple watchlists
Bar Replay
Indicators on indicators
Chart data export (not something I personally need)
Intraday Renko, Kagi, Line Break, Point & Figure charts (not something I personally need)
Charts based on custom formulas
Time Price Opportunity (not something I personally need)
Auto Chart Patterns (not something I personally need)
Second-based alerts (not something I personally need)
Alerts that don't expire (not something I personally need)
Publishing invite-only scripts
Second-based intervals
Out of these 22 features, I only need 12.
Imagine some price action traders who may never use indicators or want some other premium features and end up also paying for 25 indicators per tab.
Since second-based timeframes are only available for Premium and above users, I have no choice but to subscribe to the premium plan.
What do you all think?
It's challenging to implement a pricing policy where users can select a customized feature set and pay accordingly.
I'm unsure about the operational and financial feasibility of this pricing strategy. However, as a customer of TradingView, I expect customization.
I understand that it is really hard for TradingView to accept my idea and actually implement it.
But still, this is what I think.
Please comment below and support my idea.
However, the problem is that I have realized I am overpaying due to the non-availability of a super-customized pricing plan that aligns with what I actually need from the platform.
As a premium user, I am currently paying for:
8 charts per tab (I only need 4)
25 indicators per chart (I need a maximum of 10)
20,000 historical bars
400 price alerts (which I personally don't use)
400 technical alerts (also unused by me)
50 parallel chart connections (I personally need only 4-5)
No ads
Volume profile (not something I personally need)
Custom timeframes
Custom Range Bars (also not something I personally need)
Multiple watchlists
Bar Replay
Indicators on indicators
Chart data export (not something I personally need)
Intraday Renko, Kagi, Line Break, Point & Figure charts (not something I personally need)
Charts based on custom formulas
Time Price Opportunity (not something I personally need)
Auto Chart Patterns (not something I personally need)
Second-based alerts (not something I personally need)
Alerts that don't expire (not something I personally need)
Publishing invite-only scripts
Second-based intervals
Out of these 22 features, I only need 12.
Imagine some price action traders who may never use indicators or want some other premium features and end up also paying for 25 indicators per tab.
Since second-based timeframes are only available for Premium and above users, I have no choice but to subscribe to the premium plan.
What do you all think?
It's challenging to implement a pricing policy where users can select a customized feature set and pay accordingly.
I'm unsure about the operational and financial feasibility of this pricing strategy. However, as a customer of TradingView, I expect customization.
I understand that it is really hard for TradingView to accept my idea and actually implement it.
But still, this is what I think.
Please comment below and support my idea.
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.