Welcome Hyperspace Travelers.
This is a Time-Series based Analysis.
You have stumbled upon a Complex Cajun Cup and Harmonic Handle.
The Harmonic Handle depicts a string of harmonics conjoined by a conjunction in vector space. This conjunction derives linear channels channeling price and defining slope and velocity.
Look carefully at the harmonics, their conjoining and their linear boundaries.
Be Open.
__________________________________________________
-26.7% on S&P 500 in one candle sequence on a higher TF.
Skip Gap TP 3000.
TP 2650
TP 2550.
TP 2250.
TP 1450.
___________________________________________
Supporting Structures.
VIX. --> goes to 50.

DXY. --> goes to 100.

Find Macro DXY Analysis Here. Still very active.

S&P 500 --> goes to 3000-->2650--> TP 3: 2550.
Most Current Snapshot from Time-Series.

Find Macro S&P Analysis Here. Still very active.

_____________________________________________
I will be actively posting snapshots of to satisfy a Time-Series based Analysis based on a 30 minute TF.
Thanks for Pondering The Unknown with Me,
Glitch420
This is a Time-Series based Analysis.
You have stumbled upon a Complex Cajun Cup and Harmonic Handle.
The Harmonic Handle depicts a string of harmonics conjoined by a conjunction in vector space. This conjunction derives linear channels channeling price and defining slope and velocity.
Look carefully at the harmonics, their conjoining and their linear boundaries.
Be Open.
__________________________________________________
-26.7% on S&P 500 in one candle sequence on a higher TF.
Skip Gap TP 3000.
TP 2650
TP 2550.
TP 2250.
TP 1450.
___________________________________________
Supporting Structures.
VIX. --> goes to 50.
DXY. --> goes to 100.
Find Macro DXY Analysis Here. Still very active.

S&P 500 --> goes to 3000-->2650--> TP 3: 2550.
Most Current Snapshot from Time-Series.
Find Macro S&P Analysis Here. Still very active.

_____________________________________________
I will be actively posting snapshots of to satisfy a Time-Series based Analysis based on a 30 minute TF.
Thanks for Pondering The Unknown with Me,
Glitch420
Note
Baseline 30 minute snapshot of TS.Note
A-C is now communicative. notice how the new harmonic I placed fits the vector according to linear conjunctions.
This conjunctions are not random but Fib based upon the dynamics of harmonics and their orthongality.
Note
now to adjust the harmonic accordingly..Note
harmonic structure fixed. awaiting error correction on depth.Note
incredible.Note
double wick to equalization at extended cup linear.Note
A-A is now communicative.Note
3500 would be a previous harmonic top level. So i slide over the red boxes from previous level definition.
Communicative Harmonics are based upon string mechanics.. which is a critical component of String Theory.
A string mechanic is not one heuristic but a combination of heuristics that is derived from a variety of well known constructs like amplitude and velocity over a vector space.
The thing that makes string harmonics unique is the fact that they are pure technical formations based upon communicative lines and loops.
A conjunction is a point of harmonic duality. Where harmonic ends and one begins.
I designed these constructs and their application here is extremely experimental.
Experimental in the sense I know they work in theory, but also in the sense that their application is not perfect. And Every mistake is a chance to tweak these heuristic's.
Yes, during this time-series I incorrectly called certain parts of the harmonic string. However in some instances, i correctly called the next part of the harmonic string.
Dynamic Binary Trading Strategy.
Notice what I never did though..
I never gave up...
And this chart is still providing me with crucial information.
Dynamic Modeling is different then static modeling.
The key to dynamic modeling is having a heuristic network that allows one to adapt to conditions using strictly technical formations and protocols.
Majority of the community uses static modeling techniques. And once they are right or wrong, then thats the end of the model.
As a community we have to grow past static modeling and adopt a new dynamic approach. Of course tools are needed and protocols are needed to guide this transition. Just know that these tools exist. And you are witnessing their birth here on my page.
Cheers.
Gl.
Trade active
The idea here is to equalize at the harmonic top which was pre-defined early on in the formation. All i did was drag it over to visualize further the equalization range. The harmonic string to 3k would be satisfied if we nail that green box and immediately begin decaying rapidly.
This would count as valid.
Completion of Idea is at 3,000 which is the mean equalization of the cyclical and linear means of the High-TF collapse.
Then we will continue to the next part of this.. The path to 2670.
Note
solidifying communicatives and their attributions.Note
Pay attention to the harmonic structural boundaries. The angular boundaries of the harmonic we are currently in.
Notice those pink flags?
Those are showing you that that angular boundary is VALID.
Structural integrity of these harmonics is unique and follow certain modeling laws.
Look at each harmonic. You will notice almost every harmonic I have derived on the string follows these laws. I have not mentioned these laws anywhere but they are based off pre-existing law
Being a dynamic model based upon a subjective interpretation we must adhere to these laws the best we can but also understanding that no strategy is perfect.
D-A-B are now communicative.
A-B communicative High Strength.
Orthogonality between Communicatives rendering
Note
by having designated communicative levels that are static over TF> I can tailor my harmonic structures to fit these communicative strings as long as the angular boundaries are adhered too. I made these clear by using pink flags. Either we drop now are we engage the next harmonic communicative probability scenario which A-C-B which was defined as the harmonic top and 100^ equalization poiont of the Cajun Cup.
It does look like we are about to switch to the A-C-B communicative harmonic level.
Note
well clearly harmonic top defined did not define our top. communicatives worked but current communicative is an outlier.
Outlier confirmation would be amazing.
We can still complete this formation... IMO>
Trade active
I know some of you are quite intelligent who are lurking over my work. Some of you are simply uneducated trolls who lash out at the sight of something different because its validity is unknown to you.
That's ok.
Give me 5 years of refinement of my work.
You will be doing it too eventually.
Because TA is old you see..
It's time for an upgrade, you see?
Can you see?
Why. Do. I stay. Consistent?
Note
C-B communicative found. Simply Amazing. Such precision and respect to the Fibonacci.
Note
holy fuck... holy fuck fuck.
so the original OP was a regular cup and handle formation.
When you press play. It does complete a pop.
Maybe i was wrong to think we would exit the regular cup and handle formation, but the complexity of this technical string is insane.
Look... a FULLY formed Inverted Cup and Handle...
Now outlined in Green.
Incredible.
I am going to continue this string.
Because we have developed into a new complex inverted cup and handle from a regular cup and handle.
Based upon the sequence of events, it is interesting to note, that we do pop on the regular cup and it would be extra re-affirming if we can drop here.
Notice how the B harmonic is now all alone at the top of about 3680.
I am def noting that level.
This is 2020, so anything is possible.
Note
Don't lose sight of that green inverted cup and handle formation when I post this next snapshot...No coincidences.
A cyclical conspiracy.
JFC.
These High Frequency Trading Algorithms deployed by dark money really makes me chuckle sometimes. I see you and your geometry.
Its beautiful. But sorry. I am going to decode them.
I will hide the arc in red but i want you to see how the harmonic formations compliment the complex linears and arcs.
Note
I am in UVXY with a 13.5 AVG. No real pain yet for me.
Even with these POPS on SPX. I trade UVXY as a binary inverse to SPX>
Works very well.
TBH.
Note
B-C communicative found...Harmonic Top Defined.. Again.
Note
we now have a structural match between now and pre-drop 1 from the FEB 19th- FEb 26th drop sequence. that lead us from 3400 to 2200. Except this time it will by 3600 to 1200.
Note
freaky.Note
ITS REPEATING AGAIN! this time with a C-C communicative & A-A communicative!.. SAME AS BEFORE..
Harmonic structure stays intact..
BInary play remains open.
Just roll with the flow.
Note
still would be nice to nail my initial projection though.Note
B-A-A communicative..Note
-20% easily reaches equalization of complex formation and the end of this idea.Note
holy fucking shit.Note
yep.I am stubborn as fuck.
Note
Talk about stubborn. ;)Related publications
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.
Related publications
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.