Is your money worth reading "maybe´s"
Updated
Hello Trenders,
Been thinking a lot to or to not publish this signal. Many of you expect a deep on global level, therefore I here show you some mathematic forecast.
This may not be the end of the world, yet it is far worse than the most downbeat forecasts. The evidence to support this outlook is in plain
sight. Some sixth-grade math is a good place to begin the analysis. Make 2019 economic output 100 (the actual figure is $22 trillion; “100” is
100 percent of that number; a convenient way to measure ups and downs). Assume output drops 20 percent over the second and third
quarters of 2020 (many estimates project larger drops; 20 percent is a plausible if conservative estimate). A 20 percent drop for six months
equals a 10 percent drop for the full year, assuming the first and fourth quarters are flat on net. A 10 percent drop from 100 = 90 (or $2.2
trillion of lost output).
Since 1948, U.S. annual real growth in GDP has never exceeded 10 percent. Since 1984, real growth has never exceeded 5 percent. The
highest-growth years since the end of World War II were 8.7 percent in 1950, 8 percent in 1951, and 7.2 percent in 1984. An assumption
that real growth will occur in 2021 at a 6 percent annual rate is a generous if unrealistic assumption. Such growth would qualify as a Vshaped recovery.
If our new base is 90 (compared with 100 in 2019) and we increase output by 6 percent in 2021, this brings total output to 95.4. If we
enter 2022 with the new base of 95.4 and increase that base by 4 percent (so, 95.4 × 1.04), we come to 99.2 in total output by the end of
2022. Here’s the problem. Using 100 as a baseline for 2019 output, and assuming 6 percent real growth in 2021 and 4 percent in 2022 (rates
of growth that have not happened on an annual basis since 1984), the economy does not get back to 2019 output levels. The hard truth is
that 99.2 < 100.
Source : The new great depression (2021).
What about if we really have a second wave harder then the first with mutatied covid?
I want to add, is not my intention to spread panic or "maybe´s" but the study got my attention.
Even the legends will have trouble surviving if this happen.
So how can a trader survive in this case condition by trading as only source of income???
Perhaps agricultural commodities will always perform....
Been thinking a lot to or to not publish this signal. Many of you expect a deep on global level, therefore I here show you some mathematic forecast.
This may not be the end of the world, yet it is far worse than the most downbeat forecasts. The evidence to support this outlook is in plain
sight. Some sixth-grade math is a good place to begin the analysis. Make 2019 economic output 100 (the actual figure is $22 trillion; “100” is
100 percent of that number; a convenient way to measure ups and downs). Assume output drops 20 percent over the second and third
quarters of 2020 (many estimates project larger drops; 20 percent is a plausible if conservative estimate). A 20 percent drop for six months
equals a 10 percent drop for the full year, assuming the first and fourth quarters are flat on net. A 10 percent drop from 100 = 90 (or $2.2
trillion of lost output).
Since 1948, U.S. annual real growth in GDP has never exceeded 10 percent. Since 1984, real growth has never exceeded 5 percent. The
highest-growth years since the end of World War II were 8.7 percent in 1950, 8 percent in 1951, and 7.2 percent in 1984. An assumption
that real growth will occur in 2021 at a 6 percent annual rate is a generous if unrealistic assumption. Such growth would qualify as a Vshaped recovery.
If our new base is 90 (compared with 100 in 2019) and we increase output by 6 percent in 2021, this brings total output to 95.4. If we
enter 2022 with the new base of 95.4 and increase that base by 4 percent (so, 95.4 × 1.04), we come to 99.2 in total output by the end of
2022. Here’s the problem. Using 100 as a baseline for 2019 output, and assuming 6 percent real growth in 2021 and 4 percent in 2022 (rates
of growth that have not happened on an annual basis since 1984), the economy does not get back to 2019 output levels. The hard truth is
that 99.2 < 100.
Source : The new great depression (2021).
What about if we really have a second wave harder then the first with mutatied covid?
I want to add, is not my intention to spread panic or "maybe´s" but the study got my attention.
Even the legends will have trouble surviving if this happen.
So how can a trader survive in this case condition by trading as only source of income???
Perhaps agricultural commodities will always perform....
Note
As we see the volatility index is preparing for departure. The moment the Standart will make "Poor" the mass 500 times the same moment Crude oil will follow the same pattern and VIX will be the big winner. Be aware: we talking about monthly chart, zoom time frame for accuracy, that anyway doesn´t change the outcome.
Note
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.