The Poor Man’s Covered Call ExplainedWhat Is The Poor Man’s Covered Call?
Questions we’ll answer in this discussion:
- What is it?
- Who is it for?
- When to use it?
The Poor Man’s Covered Call is a very specific type of spread. As you know, we’ve been covering option spreads for several Coffee With Markus Sessions.
We’ve also covered the Covered Call’s strategy in-depth on our YouTube Channel.
In this article, we’re discussing the difference between trading stocks, covered calls, and the Poor Man’s Covered Call.
Trading Stocks
Let’s take a look at trading stocks first. Let’s say that you’re bullish on a stock like Boeing BA . If you were bullish on this stock, you might purchase a decent amount of stock, let’s say 100 shares.
At the time of the original writing of this article, this stock’s strike price was $180. If you purchased 100 shares of BA , at $180 dollars each, this would require $18,000 in purchasing power.
If the stock increases by $10, to $190, you stand to earn $1,000 in net profit.
So you’ve risked $18,000 to earn $1,000. If the stock price increases to $200, you’ll earn $2,000 and so on.
This is pretty basic and you probably understand this concept.
A profit picture is a sliding scale that moves to the right as the stock price increased.
It is a visual representation of your profits. or losses depending on the movement of the stock.
In this example, the price of the stock is increasing so the scale is moving to the right.
Selling Covered Calls
In this example, let’s say that you’re still bullish on BA . And in the short term, you expect an upward movement in price.
Since you already own the 100 shares of BA stock, you can sell a $200 Call Option against these shares (again, this is based on the price of BA at the time of writing this article).
If the stock price increases to $190 like you expect, you’ll earn an additional $450 on top of the $1,000 you’ve already earned.
If we see a decrease in stock price, the covered call acts as a hedge.
In this example, if we saw a downward movement to $170 you would lose $1,000.
But because you sold a $200 Call option contract and received a premium of $450, your net loss would only be $550.
Covered Calls VS Poor Man’s Covered Call
Poor Man’s Covered Call
When would you trade a Poor Man’s Covered Call?
That’s easy! When you don’t have the $18,000 to buy 100 BA shares!
And When do you trade a covered call?
When you expect the stock to stay above the current price and move slightly higher.
Instead of buying a stock, you would purchase a deep in the money call option at a later expiration.
When looking for a call option deeper in the money, we’re trying to find one with a Delta of 0.95.
his means for every dollar the stock moves, the call option is gaining .95 cents in value.
Deep “In The Money” Calls
For this example, We’re buying a deep ITM call at $71 which means the capital required to take this position is only $7,100.
As you can see this is a fraction of the price to purchase the stock outright.
At the same time, we will sell the $200 Call option. Similar to the covered call.
But instead of owning the stock at a price of $18,000, we purchased the ITM call option and sold a $200 call option.
if the underlying stock price moves from $180 to $190 you would make $1335 because the Delta is 0.95, which means it’s only increasing 95% of the value.
The profit on this type of position isn’t as high as a covered call, but it’s much more than owning the stock outright, with much less risk and less capital.
This sounds too good to be true right? The perfect strategy! BUT… there’s a downside associated with this strategy.
Your profit is limited. If you see a huge movement in the underlying stock, you’ll only benefit from a portion of the total gains.
In this example, if the underlying strike price gained $40, the stockholder would earn $4,000.
The covered call would earn $2450, and the Poor Man’s Covered Call would earn $2,320.
Many traders use this strategy because of the limited capital involved with taking on a position, and the limited risk associated with a potential downward movement of this stock.
Poormanscoveredcall
EDUCATION: BACK MONTH DURATION SELECTION FOR SYNTHETICSI have on occasion highlighted the benefits of using various options strategies instead of getting into stock, not the least amongst them being buying power effect. Pictured here is a 98.35 delta long call in SPY in the December 16th '22 (896 Days Until Expiration) cycle costing 183.35 ($18,335) to put on versus 312.23 spot (i.e., it would cost $31,233 to get into a full, uncovered one lot of SPY here). Although even this highly delta'd long call is "dynamic" (i.e., its delta will change in response to movement in the underlying, decreasing as price moves into the strike and increasing as it moves away), it is -- at least at the outset -- near being equivalent to being in long SPY stock at the strike price (130) plus its value (183.35) or 313.35.*
Such deeply monied longs generally stand in for stock, which are then covered with a short call to emulate a covered call without paying covered call prices. This is particularly important in a cash secured setting where buying power is limited or in small accounts where getting into a full one lot of certain underlyings is prohibitive. Naturally, even getting into this particular long call will be beyond the reach of some smaller accounts, but I'm using SPY here as an exemplar; the same delta and duration considerations apply with any underlying.
Generally speaking, my rule as to duration with the back month long has been to "go as long-dated as you can afford to go," since having a longer back month duration allows for a maximal number of opportunities to reduce cost basis via short call. However, if your go-to strike to buy as your stock substitute is, for example, something around the 100 delta strike,** then going longer-dated usually means that you'll have to go deeper and deeper in the money to buy that strike, and that usually gets more and more expensive as you go out in time. But does it?
Here's a look at SPY long calls around the 100 delta and their cost over time:
October 16th 155 (105 days) 158.15
January 15th 130 (196 days) 183.20
March 19th 130 (258 days) 183.50
June 18th 130 (350 days) 183.35
September 17th 130 (441 days) 183.35
December 17th 130 (532 days) 183.30
March 18th '22 130 (623 days) 183.30
June 17th '22 130 (714 days) 183.30
December 16th '22 130 (896 days) 183.35
Interesting, huh? You basically don't pay more by going longer-dated between January of '21 and December of '22. Naturally, this might not always be the case; currently, expiry implied volatility slopes away somewhat from shorter duration implied in SPY, with all of '22 being between 22.6 and 22.9%, and we've had substantial periods of time where it is the exact opposite: implied slopes upward from short to longer duration. Put another way, you'll probably have to look at whether going longer duration makes sense each time you get ready to set one of these up.
Just for kicks, I also looked at QQQ:
October 16th 130: 122.95
January 15th 112: 141.00
March 19th 105: 148.05
June 18th 92 (lowest strike available): 160.05
September 17th 92 (lowest strike available): 161.00
June 17th '22 92 (lowest strike available): 161.00
December 16th '22 92 (lowest strike available): 161.50
Not much difference between going June of '21 versus December of '22.
And EFA (albeit with fewer available expiries to look at):
December 18th 25 (lowest strike): 37.02
March 19th 25 (lowest strike): 37.02
June 18th 25 (lowest strike): 37.00
January '22 25 (lowest strike): 36.88
No significant difference between December of '21 and January of '22.
And TLT:
October 16th 95: 68.55
December 18th 95: 68.55
January 15th 95: 68.55
January 21st '22 95: 68.55
December 16th '22 95: 68.60
No significant difference between October of this year and December of '22.
In a nutshell: where there isn't a significant difference in price between shorter and longer duration of the same delta, go with the longer duration. It'll afford you with more time to reduce cost basis and/or generate cash flow via short call premium.
* -- That particular strike is bid 181.90/mid 188.35/ask 184.75, but would to get filled somewhere closer to spot (312.33) minus the strike price (130) or 182.33. In all likelihood, you're going to pay some small amount of extrinsic, but would start price discovery there, since a strike near the 100 delta should be almost all intrinsic value.
** -- My general go-to in the past has been to buy the back month 90, sell the front month 30 to obtain a net delta metric of +60. Buying a slightly lower delta'd long will obviously cost less (e.g., the 90-delta December 16th '22 is at the 205 strike and would cost 114.25 to put on versus the near 100 delta 130's cost of 183.35), but will also have more extrinsic in it.