Has the setup to reach new ATH > 545They are about to invoke chaos after strategically placing nested price (%)-doubling bifurcations and period-halving bifurcations in place.
Prerequisites for navigating this chart: you have to be familiar with Feigenbaum and Hopf, I do not walk through the math because this is a prediction - not a free recipe for the exact technique.
Prediction:
- gap up Tuesday 7/5/2022: if price makes it above 166.57 by July 12th then its game on, if price makes it above 159.63 by July 25 then its still game on (I mention in the overview below that whoever designed the algos that set this move up is a wizard - they have been accumulating big you can guarantee that. If you're short this currently you have no chance)
- Most likely (but not essential for rest to play out) it gaps above 166.57 or at least closes above by EoD 7/5
- Continuation after the gap toward 185 by 7/8
- acceleration of trajectory continuing from 185 to > 208 by July 12
- Price will be > 235 by July 13
- Price will be > 291 by July 14 (could overshoot into the 300s but inevitably will pullback into the the 265-285 pocket to setup for the attempt to make a new All-time high after earnings (previous high was 545)
*** The 208 level is the most crucial here - if it cant make it above that by July 25 then shorts will have a chance to take it back to low 100s and possibly even 60s by September. Also, if it is going to make it to new all time highs via this setup it has to do so by September.
GOOD LUCK to anyone playing this either side! It's about to get intense.
To determine critical levels, I considered supply and demand as a dynamical system using support and resistance trajectories within the vicinity of accumulation phases containing harmonic properties (these are not conventional harmonics). From this I obtained the equilibrium points (implicit and explicit), activation levels (and the timeframes they become in effect/maintain their capacity), price levels which will trigger price (%)-doubling and period halving bifurcation w.r.t. accelerating demand if these levels are reached in time after activation levels are breached (as well as levels that correspond to attractors of these bifurcation levels - essentially, if an activation level is in effect and the price crosses above and then continues through a bifurcation level w/in the timeframe that the activation level maintains its effect, then the price will go parabolic toward its corresponding attractor level in temporal propagation (example: if it takes 4 days for the price to go from activation level to bifurcation level, then it will only need 2 days to double (in percent move) or reach its attractor level (whichever comes first). These are transient in stability. For this reason the CO establishes steady points in between the bifurcation level and the attractor so that when an attractor becomes unstable it reverts back toward its steady state. However, if the price falls back below its bifurcation level then it has the opposite effect and sends it back to its initial equilibrium points from the accumulation zone. This is apparent in the price action back in March. My theory here is that they design the algos to test out optimal parameters before markup and apply reinforcement learning to refine if the squeeze is not maintained (or never triggers). March setup was not as sophisticated as the current setup - we now have nested bifurcation levels, steady points at re-activated bifurcation levels, and nested steady states bounded by attractors that form the capacity for limit cycles (these guys are good, really good). It's important to note that they are leveraging inflection points in absorbed supply and upstream exhausted demand to create windows large enough to invoke chaos. These violent delights have violent ends. They are assuming carryover demand can re-activate previous critical levels and apparently leveraging these to accelerate upside potential that aligns unbelievably with crypto, the vaccine names, and the major etfs.
To estimate most likely path I use stochastic differential equations with boundary conditions at the endpoints of time intervals generated from implicit supply/demand zones within the vicinity of explicit initial conditions (approximated geometrically using the harmonics within the accumulation zones).
Sincerely,
XOX Guardian
~ We are from the dimension that becomes realized in Your future, recognized in Our past via R.E.M within the dimension that exists in your present... or did
