Pox Vaccine/Treatment Long, Dark WinterWith the small rise of pox news going on in the U.S., be it the second case of monkeypox this year , to smallpox vials found at a vaccine research facility in Pennsylvania, it brings to question as to whether or not health companies that have the capability to manufacture vaccines, treatments, and test kits against smallpox will be the new growth sector of vaccine stocks in the future.
Although smallpox is considered eradicated since 1980, considering other variants of smallpox like monkeypox are still present in this world and the lack of immunity among the young (people under the age of 35) from the closure of smallpox vaccine production (we're talking about a ~ 15% fatality rate that goes up to ~40% the younger a person is ), it is still a clear and present danger to society. Doesn't help that the FDA has been more active in approving multiple vaccines and treatments over the last 3 years. . Though the good news is that the Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE) will target to stockpile enough vaccines for every American according to a 2016 report .
PREVENTION
As of my knowledge, the following stocks hold a trademark of a vaccine against smallpox:
- $EBS, ACAM2000 ®
- $BVNRY, holds a trademark of a vaccine against monkeypox, named JYNNEOS® under the FDA . For tradenames of this vaccine under other regions, see the investor news page published this july .Note the JYNNEOS vaccine is the only currently FDA-approved vaccine for the prevention of monkeypox disease and smallpox. These vaccines are not readily available to public, but several treatments are ... more on that below.
- $SNY, the Aventis Pasteur Smallpox Vaccine (APSV), that is available in the event that ACAM2000® is depleted within the U.S. Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) which apparently holds 90M doses . Note Aventis was merged with Sanofi in 2004, just to clear up any confusion on any old web pages from before 2004.
More details about these vaccines can be found here:
www.cdc.gov
www.cdc.gov
www.fda.gov
You could argue $NVAX to be a good pick but I would consider it a long-term play.
TREATMENTS
The following stocks hold a trademarked treatment against smallpox:
- $SIGA , TPOXX® , also known as tecovirimat and ST-246®
- $CMRX , Tembexa (brincidofovir)
There are many more companies working on treatments/detections against smallpox, so feel free to research and find them before they go public. This idea is merely an inspiration for you to look for and capitalize on this opportunity if it presents itself in the future.
Take BioFire as an example, a private company contracted by the DoD to supply them test kits on various biological warfare agents including smallpox . ( Pg 105 of 2016 Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE) Strategy and Implementation Plan). But although there private, they've merged w/ bioMerieux , a publicly-traded company, in January 2014. In the event that the supply of vaccines does meet demand, this could be an alternative strategy seeing as test detection kits may not be in demand at the moment. Especially considering that the awarded NGDS contract was valued at $240M for a period of 8 years, or $30M per year(which corresponds very closely with how much $ was allocated toward JOINT BIOLOGICAL AGENT DECONTAMINATION SYSTEM (JBADS) according to the UNCLASSIFIED Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Budget Estimates document released in May this year on Page 2 of 91, P-1 line #80 titled CB Protection & Hazard Mitigation, or just page 142 of 754 of the pdf doc). With each kit costing $8K-$9k each for 30 tests , at max the DoD should hold ~30K kits assuming these kits have not been used and have an extended shelf life beyond the lifetime of the awarded gov. contract, and that this budget does not include any other products from BioFire related to the NGDS. 30K units with 30 tests each means 900,000 total possible tests... if they're single-use, it may not be even enough for essential personnel contracted by the gov. Even if you consider smallpox's eradication... it is not reasonable for the gov to spend a bit more on these kits seeing they cover detection on outbreaks outside of smallpox like anthrax, ebola, etc.
Thankfully Bill Gates did warn us of bioterror attacks concerning smallpox earlier this year. The same goes for U.S. Government agencies and institutions' wargaming of such an event back in 2001, naming the exercise, Dark Winter .
A couple of interesting conclusions from this exercise:
-No surge capacity in U.S. healthcare and public health systems. Given how COVID-19 went, not too surprising but as expected
-Information management w/ media be crucial for crisis control. Lol, w/ the amount of distrust in the media and gov. this will be sh*tshow. Don't be surprised by draconian levels of control over the flow of info if this outbreak happens.
-Renewed vaccine production is estimated to require at least 24-36 months. Big yikes.
If a smallpox breakout does happen and vaccine hesitancy continues w/ smallpox vaccines, let alone the supply of these products not being able to catch up to their demand, expect a high amount of casualties and stocks related to the treatment rather than the prevention of smallpox to rise. Nonetheless, the living will be capable of seeing a new and brighter world of the 4th industrial revolution by 2030.
Feel free to comment below on any constructive criticism against this idea. I'd like to strengthen it and improve on the quality of future ideas. If my grammar is bad, it is no excuse, but I was raised with poor primary education, it will get better with time. If you agree with this idea, feel free to leave a like and share, thank you.
Billgates
MICROSOFT:FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSIS+PRICE ACTION & NEXT TARGET|LONG🔔Microsoft released its fourth-quarter results on July 27. The company's revenue rose 21% year over year to $46.2 billion, beating forecasts by $1.9 billion, and earnings rose 49% to $2.17 per share, beating expectations by $0.25. Commercial cloud revenue - which comes primarily from Microsoft 365 (formerly Office 365), LinkedIn, Dynamics CRM, and the Azure cloud infrastructure platform - rose 36% from a year ago to $19.5 billion.
That represents an acceleration from the 33% growth in the commercial cloud segment in Q3, but Azure's 45% year-over-year revenue growth in constant currency slowed down from the 46% growth in the third quarter. However, Azure revenue still grew 51% in the period, compared to 50% growth in the previous quarter, so it profited from favorable currency factors.
Azure's growth rate still looks strong, but Microsoft's unwillingness to disclose any further numbers on the cloud platform is discouraging. Let's look at three reasons why Microsoft should finally open the curtain.
First, it is one of Microsoft's most significant businesses.
Azure is the main growth engine of the commercial cloud division. It has consistently grown faster than Microsoft/Office 365 and Dynamics 365 and remains the second-largest cloud infrastructure platform in the world after Amazon Web Services (AWS).
According to Canalys, Azure controlled 22 percent of the global cloud infrastructure market in the second quarter of 2021. It is behind AWS at 31%, but well ahead of Alphabet's Google Cloud, which is in third place with an 8% share.
Disclosing the exact amount of Azure's revenues and profits would let investors know whether Microsoft has pricing power in this competitive market, or whether it is simply trading margins for market share.
Second, consider that Amazon and Google don't hide their cloud metrics.
In 2015, Amazon began reporting accurate data on AWS revenue and operating profits. Google followed suit, reporting accurate Google Cloud revenues in 2019 and then disclosing the division's operating losses in 2020.
Last year, Amazon's AWS revenue grew 30% to $45.4 billion, or 12% of total revenue. Segment operating income rose 47% to $13.5 billion and accounted for 59% of operating income. In other words, Amazon can support the development of its low-margin retail business at the expense of its higher-margin cloud business, giving it an advantage over other online and offline retailers.
Revenues at Alphabet's Google Cloud unit rose 46% to $13.1 billion in 2020, a 7% increase. The division's operating loss increased from $4.6 billion to $5.6 billion, but Alphabet's total operating income still rose 20% to $41.2 billion. These numbers suggest that Google Cloud is offering lower prices than AWS to expand its market share, but the company can afford to stick with this losing strategy since it can compensate its losses from cloud computing with higher advertising revenue.
As for Azure, investors still don't know how much the cloud platform boosts Microsoft's revenues and how much it reduces profit growth.
Finally, no more vague hints about Azure's margins.
Microsoft executives mention Azure dozens of times during every conference call, but only hint a few times at the platform's actual gross margin. During Microsoft's third-quarter conference call in April, CFO Amy Hood said Azure's gross margin is growing, but the "shift in sales mix toward Azure" is still reducing the overall gross margin of the commercial cloud segment.
In the fourth quarter, Microsoft said that commercial cloud gross margins "increased 4 points to 70% despite the shift in revenue mix toward Azure," and the 14% year-over-year increase in operating expenses was mostly "driven by investments in Azure" - but we don't know exactly how much was spent.
These indefinite comments tell us three things about Azure: it makes far less profit than Microsoft's other commercial cloud businesses, it offers customers lower rates to keep up with AWS and Google Cloud, and it is constantly expanding with new investments and services.
Giving accurate revenue and operating profit data would clarify things and show investors how much money Microsoft is losing (or perhaps making) on one of its fastest-growing businesses.
Former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer recommended the management to reveal cloud revenue, margins, and profits six years ago, but his successor, Satya Nadella, did not follow the advice. Nadella's position made sense then, as Microsoft was just beginning its transition, but today it doesn't make much sense-particularly after Amazon and Google have laid all their cards on the table.
$MSFT Support Bounce or Shoulder Building 6/7We are in pivotal part of the market where investors or unsure and fear is aplenty. That being said I always trying to come at the market as a day trader and swing trader without being emotionally attached to a stock. I like certain stocks on fundamentals and will buy them again long term, but as a day trader I am only in search of weekly or monthly flings. Those profits go into long term accounts that are mostly sitting in cheap leaps or fundamentally sound stocks with long hedges.
All that being said we could see $MSFT go both ways, and until I see a break I'm not going to pretend that I know what i will do in a supply zone. I have received some flack for my "both ways recently" but during a time of great fear its better to leave your emotional bias at home and look at where things could get messy and be honest with yourself. Just some advice for those of you day trading and if you are in stocks long term, use that same approach to hedge yourself correctly.
Good luck !
LONG on Quantum Scape once wave 2 is confirmedWe got a 13% move to the high of the day and we took an ABC back 4% and now volume is coming in again and I think we will see more action to come over the next two weeks as they prepare to release their delayed easrnings. Always wonder when a company delays earning why and the reason behind it. These guys are being sued by 3-5 different law firms for supposedly misrepressenting their products abiliries so if you bouight any of this stock in December of 2020 you can join one of multiple class action lawsuits being filed. I think they will try to get the price back up over the next two weeks and if the earnings are what I expect the price could come back to the $60-$70 range and that will pretty much wipe out the complainers who bought in at $77. If I they don't then their plan is to release bad earnings and drive the stock down to $30 and use the money shorting this stock to pay the lawsuits and fines. As always it's a win win for the rich and scandalous. BILL GATES IS A MAJOR BACKER OF THIS PONZI SCHEME TO DUMP THE PRICE. VW IS ALSO THE OTHER MAJOR BACKER . QUANTUM SCAPE IS JUST THE BATTERY MAKER AND VW IS SUPPLYING THE BODY AND FRAMES AND SUCH. EITHER WAY WE HAVE 2 SCENARIOS DOWN TO $30 OR UP TO $47 IN THE SHORT TIME FRAME AND MAYBE HIGHER IF WE GET A CONFIRMED 12345 IMPULSE WAVE. BUT IF WE GO INTO AN ABC THEN EXPECT MORE BLOOD!