MACRO FINANCIAL ANALYSIS | ASSETS & LIABILITIESICEUS:DX1! Financial data analysis from 11 main H.8 tables released on February 7, 2025 covers Assets and Liabilities of various types of banking institutions in the United States. This analysis covers large domestic banks, small domestic banks, and foreign institutions to provide a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics of the financial system.
Methodology
The analysis evaluates the growth of various asset and liability components, including Bank Credit, Deposits, Borrowings, Securities, Cash Assets, and Loans to Commercial Banks, as well as their impact on financial markets and the macroeconomy.
Impact on Financial Markets
Changes in financial markets include:
Stock Market: If bank liquidity declines due to a reduction in Cash Assets and an increase in Borrowings, banking stocks may experience pressure in several ways. First, higher funding costs due to increased Borrowings can reduce bank profit margins, making banking stocks less attractive to investors. Second, if liquidity tightens and banks restrict credit expansion, business sectors dependent on banking finance may slow down, negatively affecting financial sector stock indices and the broader economy. Third, stock market volatility may increase if investors anticipate uncertainty in bank funding strategies, potentially leading to sell-offs in banking stocks and further price declines.
Bond Market: If banks prefer investing in Treasury Securities over issuing loans, demand for government bonds increases, potentially driving bond yields lower. As a result, institutional investors may seek higher-yield alternatives, such as stocks or corporate bonds. Additionally, lower Treasury bond yields may push down long-term interest rates, benefiting the real estate sector and debt-based investments. However, if yields drop too low, banks may face tighter profit margins as lending rates also decline, potentially reducing banking sector profitability.
Forex Market: Tight bank liquidity and changes in interest rates can impact the USD exchange rate against major currencies in several ways. If liquidity declines and interest rates rise, the USD may strengthen due to increased demand for USD-denominated assets, offering higher returns. Conversely, if liquidity pressures lead to instability in the banking sector, global investors may lose confidence in the U.S. economy, weakening the USD. These changes can also increase currency market volatility and affect forex-based investment strategies.
Interbank Money Market: If Loans to Commercial Banks continue to decline, this may indicate reduced interbank confidence or changes in liquidity strategies, affecting short-term interest rate volatility.
Impact of Short-Term Interest Rate Volatility:
Uncertainty in Interbank Lending: If interest rate volatility increases, banks will be more cautious in providing short-term loans to other institutions, which may slow liquidity circulation within the financial system.
Higher Funding Costs for Banks: If volatility rises and interbank interest rates spike suddenly, banks highly exposed to short-term funding could face increased funding costs, potentially reducing their profit margins.
Impact on Credit to the Real Sector: If banks face uncertainty in short-term funding costs, they may adopt tighter lending policies, slowing credit growth to businesses and households.
Regulatory Intervention: If interest rate volatility becomes unmanageable, The Fed or other financial regulators may take measures such as open market operations to stabilize interest rates and maintain money market liquidity.
Impact on the Macroeconomy
Credit Growth and Investment: If Bank Credit grows more slowly, businesses and households may face limited credit access, potentially slowing investment and consumption.
Inflation and Monetary Policy: If liquidity pressures increase, The Fed may need to consider more accommodative monetary policies to prevent excessive credit tightening.
Example Measures:
- Lowering the benchmark interest rate to reduce borrowing costs for banks and businesses.
- Increasing asset purchase programs such as Quantitative Easing (QE) to inject liquidity into the financial system.
- Providing emergency lending facilities to banks under liquidity stress to stabilize money and banking markets.
- Adjusting bank reserve requirements to encourage credit expansion to the real sector.
Systemic Risk: If liquidity shortages in the banking sector persist, they could trigger systemic risks requiring intervention from regulators such as The Fed, FDIC, or OCC to stabilize financial markets.
Key Findings Summary
1. Trends in Bank Credit & Consumer Loans
✔ Bank Credit is growing moderately across all bank categories, with average growth of +3.2% to +5.5%, indicating stable credit expansion.
✔ Consumer Loans increased by +1.7% to +2.9%, with Credit Card loans rising faster (+5.0%), suggesting increased consumption through credit.
✔ Loans to Nondepository Financial Institutions surged by +8.8%, reflecting high confidence in non-bank financial entities.
✔ Automobile Loans declined by -2.3%, signaling weaker demand for auto financing.
Implication: If this trend continues, it could support consumption but also increase credit default risk.
2. Bank Liquidity & Interbank Lending
✔ Cash Assets declined by -4.8% to -10.4%, indicating potential liquidity constraints in the banking system.
✔ Loans to Commercial Banks dropped by -7.1% to -14.3%, suggesting shifts in interbank liquidity strategies.
✔ Federal Funds Sold & Reverse RPs increased by +3.1% to +7.8%, showing higher short-term liquidity activity.
Risk & Impact:
• Increased liquidity pressures can lead to higher interbank lending rates, raising funding costs for commercial banks.
• If this trend persists, banks heavily reliant on short-term funding may face solvency pressures.
• Worst-case scenario: If liquidity continues to decline and interest rates rise sharply, this could trigger systemic financial risks, prompting intervention by The Fed or other regulators such as FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) to guarantee deposits, OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency) to enforce credit restrictions, or even the U.S. Treasury Department providing bailouts to distressed banks to maintain financial stability.
Possibility: Banks should strengthen liquidity management by extending funding maturities and reducing reliance on short-term money markets.
3. Deposits, Borrowings, and Bank Funding Strategies
✔ Deposits grew by +2.0% to +6.7%, reflecting continued confidence in the banking system.
✔ Large Time Deposits grew at a slower pace (+0.9% to +2.9%), indicating investors are seeking higher-yield alternatives.
✔ Borrowings increased by +6.7% to +7.3%, suggesting rising funding needs amid tighter liquidity.
Risk & Impact:
• Higher Borrowings can increase bank leverage, raising liquidity risk if short-term funding dries up.
• If Deposits grow slower than Borrowings, this could indicate early signs of reliance on external funding, potentially increasing funding costs and lowering profitability.
• Worst-case scenario: If this persists, some banks may need to aggressively raise deposit rates, tightening their profit margins further.
Possibility: Banks should diversify funding sources and implement risk management strategies to mitigate overreliance on external borrowing.
Some Possible Strategies That Will Be Carried Out By Various Roles
1. Regulator & Policy Maker Steps
✔ Monitor Borrowings and Deposits trends to determine whether monetary policy needs to be adjusted.
✔ Ensure there is a balance between credit expansion and liquidity stability to keep the financial system healthy.
✔ Evaluate the decline in interbank lending, which could be a sign of systemic risk in the banking sector.
2. Investor & Market Player Steps
✔ Surely will use bank securities holdings and cash positions data to identify investment opportunities.
✔ They will pay attention to Borrowings levels and deposit rates, as these can affect the profitability of the banking sector.
✔ And will monitor bank equity as an indicator of financial stability before making investment decisions.
3. Financial Institutions & Banks Steps
✔ Likely to revise funding and liquidity strategies to avoid excessive dependence on Borrowings.
✔ Or adjust the structure of loans and investments, taking into account changes in credit demand and preferences for Treasury Securities.
✔ Pay attention to leverage risk and credit risk management, especially in the face of economic uncertainty.
Key Points & Next Steps
✅ Both domestic and foreign banks continue to grow steadily, but liquidity pressures are increasing, requiring careful management.
✅ Investment in government securities is increasing, signaling a shift from credit issuance to safer assets.
✅ Customer confidence remains high, but slower deposit growth and increased lending could pose challenges going forward.
✅ Monetary policy and regulatory strategy will be closely monitored to maintain financial stability.
Possible Future Steps:
• Track liquidity trends and credit expansion to anticipate sectoral shifts.
• Monitor the Fed’s monetary policy decisions and their impact on banking and financial markets.
• Evaluate leverage and interbank lending risks as early indicators of potential financial instability.
Bondmarkets
Behind the Curtain: Top Economic Influencers on ZN Futures1. Introduction
The 10-Year Treasury Note Futures (ZN), traded on the CME, are a cornerstone of the fixed-income market. As a vital benchmark for interest rate trends and macroeconomic sentiment, ZN Futures attract institutional and retail traders alike. Their liquidity, versatility, and sensitivity to economic shifts make them a go-to instrument for both speculation and hedging.
In this article, we delve into the economic forces shaping ZN Futures’ performance across daily, weekly, and monthly timeframes. By leveraging machine learning, specifically a Random Forest Regressor, we identify the most impactful indicators influencing Treasury futures returns. These insights can help traders fine-tune their strategies and navigate the complexities of this market.
2. Product Specifications
Contract Size:
The standard ZN Futures contract represents $100,000 face value of 10-Year Treasury Notes.
Tick Size:
Each tick corresponds to 1/64 of 1% of par value. This equals $15.625 per tick, ensuring precise pricing and manageable risk for traders.
Margins:
Approximately $2,000 per contract (changes through time).
Micro Contract Availability:
While the standard contract suits institutional traders, the micro-sized Yield Futures provide a smaller-scale option for retail participants. These contracts offer reduced tick values and margin requirements, enabling broader market participation.
3. Daily Economic Drivers
Machine learning models reveal that daily fluctuations in ZN Futures are significantly influenced by the following indicators:
Building Permits: A leading indicator of housing market activity, an increase in permits signals economic confidence and growth. This optimism often puts upward pressure on yields, while a decline may reflect economic caution, boosting demand for Treasuries.
U.S. Trade Balance: This metric measures the difference between exports and imports. A narrowing trade deficit typically signals improved economic health, leading to higher yields. Conversely, a widening deficit can weaken economic sentiment, increasing Treasury demand as a safe-haven asset.
China GDP Growth Rate: As a global economic powerhouse, China’s GDP growth influences global trade and financial flows. Strong growth suggests robust international demand, pressuring Treasury prices downward as yields rise. Slower growth has the opposite effect, enhancing Treasury appeal.
4. Weekly Economic Drivers
When analyzing weekly timeframes, the following indicators emerge as significant drivers of ZN Futures:
Velocity of Money (M2): This indicator reflects the speed at which money circulates in the economy. High velocity signals robust economic activity, often putting upward pressure on yields. Slowing velocity, on the other hand, may indicate stagnation, increasing demand for Treasury securities.
Consumer Sentiment Index: This metric gauges the confidence level of consumers regarding the economy. Rising sentiment suggests stronger consumer spending and economic growth, often pressuring bond prices downward as yields rise. Conversely, a decline signals economic caution, favoring safe-haven assets like ZN Futures.
Nonfarm Productivity: This measures output per hour worked in the nonfarm sector and serves as an indicator of economic efficiency. Rising productivity typically reflects economic strength and may lead to higher yields, while stagnation or declines can shift sentiment toward Treasuries.
5. Monthly Economic Drivers
On a broader monthly scale, the following indicators play a pivotal role in shaping ZN Futures:
Net Exports: This metric captures the difference between a country’s exports and imports. A surplus indicates strong global demand for domestic goods, signaling economic strength and driving yields higher. Persistent deficits, however, may weaken economic sentiment and increase demand for Treasuries as a safe haven.
10-Year Treasury Yield: As a benchmark for longer-term borrowing costs, movements in the 10-Year Treasury Yield reflect investor expectations for economic growth and inflation. Rising yields suggest optimism about future economic conditions, potentially reducing demand for Treasury futures. Declining yields indicate caution, bolstering Treasury appeal.
Durable Goods Orders: This indicator measures new orders placed with manufacturers for goods expected to last three years or more. Rising orders signal business confidence and economic growth, often leading to higher yields. Conversely, a decline in durable goods orders can indicate slowing economic momentum, increasing Treasury demand.
6. Applications for Different Trading Styles
Economic indicators provide distinct insights depending on the trading style and timeframe:
Day Traders: Focusing on daily indicators like Building Permits, U.S. Trade Balance, and China GDP Growth Rate to anticipate short-term market movements. For example, an improvement in China’s GDP Growth Rate may signal stronger global economic conditions, potentially driving yields higher and pressuring ZN Futures lower.
Swing Traders: Weekly indicators such as Velocity of Money (M2), Consumer Sentiment Index, and Nonfarm Productivity could help identify intermediate trends. For instance, rising consumer sentiment can reflect increased spending expectations, potentially prompting bearish positions in ZN Futures.
Position Traders: Monthly metrics like Net Exports, 10-Year Treasury Yield, and Durable Goods Orders may offer a macro perspective for long-term strategies. A sustained increase in durable goods orders, for instance, may indicate economic expansion, influencing traders to potentially adopt bearish sentiment on ZN Futures.
7. Conclusion
The analysis highlights how daily, weekly, and monthly economic indicators collectively influence ZN Futures. From more immediate fluctuations driven by Building Permits and China GDP Growth Rate, to longer-term trends shaped by Durable Goods Orders and the 10-Year Treasury Yield, each timeframe provides actionable insights for traders.
By understanding these indicators and incorporating machine learning models to uncover patterns, traders can refine strategies tailored to specific time horizons. Whether intraday, swing, or long-term, leveraging these insights empowers traders to navigate ZN Futures with greater precision.
Stay tuned for the next installment in the "Behind the Curtain" series, where we examine economic drivers behind another key futures market.
When charting futures, the data provided could be delayed. Traders working with the ticker symbols discussed in this idea may prefer to use CME Group real-time data plan on TradingView: www.tradingview.com - This consideration is particularly important for shorter-term traders, whereas it may be less critical for those focused on longer-term trading strategies.
General Disclaimer:
The trade ideas presented herein are solely for illustrative purposes forming a part of a case study intended to demonstrate key principles in risk management within the context of the specific market scenarios discussed. These ideas are not to be interpreted as investment recommendations or financial advice. They do not endorse or promote any specific trading strategies, financial products, or services. The information provided is based on data believed to be reliable; however, its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. Trading in financial markets involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. Each individual should conduct their own research and consult with professional financial advisors before making any investment decisions. The author or publisher of this content bears no responsibility for any actions taken based on the information provided or for any resultant financial or other losses.
The Looming Chinese Bond Market BubbleThe Chinese bond market is showing signs of a bubble, with rapid declines in bond yields and aggressive government interventions. Despite these warnings, some investors remain bullish due to a lack of alternatives. A potential burst could lead to significant financial instability, economic slowdown, and global market contagion.
Key Indicators of a Bubble:
Excessive Price Appreciation: Sharp decline in bond yields suggests prices are detached from fundamentals.
Speculative Behavior: Investors are driven by limited alternatives rather than solid valuations.
Government Intervention: Actions to cool the market indicate concern over potential instability.
Potential Impacts of a Burst:
Chinese Market: Financial instability, economic slowdown, and currency depreciation.
Global Market: Contagion risk, increased volatility, and a global economic slowdown.
Chain Reaction of a Burst:
1. Bond Prices Decline: Losses for bondholders.
2. Financial Institutions Suffer: Liquidity problems for banks.
3. Credit Crunch: Reduced lending.
4. Economic Slowdown: Dampened economic activity.
5. Currency Depreciation:*Inflationary pressures.
6. Global Contagion: Destabilization of global markets.
Conclusion:
The Chinese bond market's bubble risk demands close monitoring. Government interventions have provided temporary stability, but underlying economic issues need resolution to prevent a severe crisis. Investors should brace for potential volatility.
Title: Ringgit Rally Fuels Foreign Bond Inflows: A Deep DiveThe Malaysian ringgit has experienced a substantial appreciation, driven by robust foreign investment in the domestic bond market. A surge in capital inflows, totaling RM5.5 billion in July alone, has propelled the ringgit's performance. This analysis delves into the underlying economic factors driving this trend, examining key indicators and assessing the outlook for sustained growth. While the current trajectory is promising, investors must remain cognizant of potential global economic headwinds.
Key Points:
Strong foreign inflows into Malaysian bonds
Ringgit's appreciation driven by multiple factors
Deep dive into economic indicators shaping USD/MYR
Assessment of Malaysia's economic fundamentals
Cautious outlook amid potential global challenges
Key Drivers of the Ringgit Rally:
Currency Appreciation: Investors are buying bonds unhedged, betting on further ringgit gains.
Strong Domestic Economy: Malaysia's economic robustness and expected interest rate stability bolster investor confidence.
Global Factors: Anticipated Federal Reserve rate cuts weakening the USD benefit the ringgit.
Economic Indicators Influencing USD/MYR:
Interest Rate Differentials: Higher local rates attract foreign capital, strengthening the ringgit.
Inflation Rates: Low inflation supports currency value.
T rade Balance: Surpluses strengthen the ringgit, reflecting Malaysia's export strength.
Economic Growth: Domestic consumption and government spending drive economic growth, enhancing the ringgit's appeal.
Political Stability: A stable political climate attracts investment, supporting the currency.
Global Economic Conditions: Global trends and geopolitical events affect investor risk appetite and currency flows.
Outlook:
Malaysia's diversified economy, fiscal prudence, and growing middle class underpin the ringgit's strength. Efforts to boost foreign direct investment and exports further support currency appreciation. However, global uncertainties, US monetary policy shifts, and geopolitical tensions could introduce volatility.
THREE WORDS THAT YOU SHOULD KNOW — TNX GOES NUTS!Bank of America says the recession and credit crunch could lead to large corporate defaults.
Credit strategists at Bank of America note that the fallout from the recession and credit crunch could see $1 trillion in corporate debt eventually become insolvent.
This is largely due to the fact that banks have already begun to refuse lending conditions after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank. US debt growth has also slowed in recent years, and a "full blown" recession has yet to be officially declared.
If a full-blown recession does not occur in the next year or two, the restart of the credit cycle will be delayed. For now, analysts still predict that a moderate/short recession is more likely than a full blown recession.
Markets are increasingly nervous about the prospect of a future downturn, with the New York Fed's Recession Probability Index projecting appr. 70 percent chance of a recession hitting by April 2024. The risk comes from the Fed's aggressive 21-fold increase in interest rates over the past 15 months to tame inflation.
The US Federal Reserve, having fired a lot of "HIKE RATE" ammos over the past two years. And certainly has fulfilled its goals.
In fact, in the second quarter of 2023, the rolling 12-month growth rate of the Consumer Price Index (April value = 4.9%) was below the Core CPI (April value = 5.5%).
In human words that means prices of food and energy are deflating year-over-year.
To some extent, the risk is also heightened by the recent banking turmoil, as lenders suffer losses on their "HELD-TO-MATURITY" (and in fact "READY-TO-SELL") portfolios of long-term corporate bonds and US Government bonds, as well as in due to a sharp outflow of deposits.
The technical picture in TVC:TNX says the key trend is still strong, thanks to tailwinds from the first quarter of 2022 and support of Weekly SMA(52).
The second half of 2023 is off to an interesting start.
High quality "AAA" 10-year Bond' yield is back to pain levels corresponding to the collapse of the FTX cryptocurrency exchange last fall, as well as the collapse of regional and cryptocurrency banks as early as this spring, 2023 (like SVB, FRC and others).
At the same time, real (that is, minus inflation) rates are now certainly much higher, against each of those two marks, as inflation is down.
MACRO MONDAY 12 - Positive MOVE IndexMACRO MONDAY 12
A Positive MOVE Index - TVC:MOVE
The U.S. Bond Market Option Volatility Estimate Index – the “MOVE” is similar to the VIX volatility index that lets us know when volatility/uncertainty is high or low in the stock market by monitoring options contracts. Instead the MOVE measures how much investors expect bonds prices to fluctuate in the future. The bond market is particularly sensitive to changes in interest rates thus the MOVE also can also advise of expectations of future interest rate volatility.
The MOVE index calculates the implied volatility of U.S. Treasury options using a weighted average of option prices on Treasury futures across multiple maturities (2, 5, 10, and 30 years). It reflects the level of volatility in U.S. Treasury futures.
When the MOVE Index is high, it means investors are worried and expect big price swings, which can be a sign of uncertainty or instability in the financial markets. When it's low, it suggests that investors are more relaxed and don't anticipate significant price movements.
In essence, the MOVE Index helps us gauge how jittery or calm the financial markets are by looking at the expectations of future price changes.
The MOVE Index can help inform us of the following:
1. A potential flight to safety: When the MOVE or Bond Option Market Volatility increases this can be a signal of a flight to safety as people exit riskier assets positions such as stocks and reallocate funds to less riskier government backed assets such as Bonds.
- The chart illustrates that increases in bond volatility
negatively impact the S&P500.
2. Future Interest Rates: By capturing investors’ expectations of potential future fluctuations in interest rates, the index serves as a proxy for the bond market’s overall sentiment regarding future interest rate movements.
- The MOVE can provide insights into the bond
market’s expectations about future interest rate
volatility, thus providing a heads up of upcoming
change to future interest rates.
The importance of the MOVE index lies in its ability to provide insights into the bond market’s expectations about future interest rate volatility and market volatility.
The Chart
With an understanding of the MOVE Index we can now dive into the chart and the implications we can draw from it;
- Above the 85 level is above average bond market
volatility and below the 85 level is below average
bond market volatility.
- Historically when the MOVE Index increases higher
than the 126 level it has resulted in significant
S&P500 price decline (red on chart).
- Conversely when we are below the 126 level this
has corresponded with positive price action for the
S&P500 the majority of the time (green on the
chart). This makes sense as a MOVE below the 126
level would suggest the bond market volatility is
reaching down to the average 85 zone or under
suggesting stable financial markets with moderate
bond & interest rate volatility expected. Under such
circumstances there is certainty and an element of
calm in financial markets allowing for capital to flow
more freely into riskier assets (instead of the safer
bonds).
- When the MOVE Index falls back into the 126 – 100
zone (orange ) this zone has been a zone of
indecision with a potential increase and bounce
back out of the zone higher or a fall lower. I would
consider this a zone a wait to see what happens
next zone.
- At present we appear falling into 100 – 85 level
(green zone). Should we fall below the 85 level this
could be considered a confirmation signal of
stability returning to the bond market which could
lead to a flow of capital to riskier assets such as
those in the S&P500.
In the period from 2007 – 2009 during the Great Financial Crisis bond volatility remained elevated above the 126 level for approx. 23 months (in the red zone on the chart) and this consisted of three peaks in bond volatility that reached a high of 265 on the MOVE Index.
At present we have had 16 months of increased bond volatility reaching in and out of the 126 red zone. Similar to 2007 – 2009 period we have had three peaks in bond volatility however we only reached a high of 173 (in 2007-2009 it was a high of 265).
We are currently moving back down towards the 85 level and this appears to be positive for markets however I would remain cautious until we make a definitive move below the 85 level. We are aware that bond volatility can remain elevated for up to 23 months and we have only been elevated for 16 months and did not reach the highs of 265 like in the 2007 – 2009 period.
The chart does not have to play out the same, reach the same levels or follow a similar time pattern as the 2007 – 2009 period however we are aware that it can move higher and that it can remain elevated for longer therefore we can remain cautious until the volatility moves under the 85 level (below the historical average).
Its hard to ignore that this chart looks bullish for the market as we move down into the green zone and into lower bond market volatility. This creates a stark argument to some of the charts I shared in previous weeks. I would be more comfortable in confirming the bull thesis from this “one” chart should we move below the average 85 level. Furthermore, it is one chart and for me it would not be enough to rely on alone.
I was listening to market guru Raoul Pal this morning and he made an compelling argument to suggest that we are already in the deep trough of a recession and might be about to start climbing out of it. It’s worth considering as recessions are typically declared up to 8 months after they have started and with many countries having already established 2 quarters of negative GDP, we certainly could be in the trough. If there is one chart that would back up Raoul Pals thesis, it is the MOVE Index which is suggesting a move to lower than average bond volatility, suggesting we are potentially beginning to enter a period of stability and certainty which would allow for capital to feel more comfortable flowing towards riskier assets.
This chart will be a great chart to keep an eye on for those with a positive or negative market lens. You can press play on the chart on trading view and it will update and tell you if we are moving into low risk levels or high risk levels, you also have boundaries for the extremes.
This chart and the others I have completed on Macro Mondays are all designed so that you can revisit them at any point and press play and see if we are breaking new into higher or lower risk territory. I hope they all help towards your investing and trading frameworks.
PUKA
US30Y - The technical pattern is in a powerful breakout30Y have benefited from rotational flows out of the S/T part of the curve into longer dated, Technically speaking the 30Y has broken out of downward trend and is indicating a strong upside move, with a first target around 3.71/3.75% by next month.
Bond Market Warned of Corrections 9/6/2020TLT at the daily view.
This is a project that my trading team and I are conducting. This is 8 of 9 charts (available on Trading View) that searches for clues for an imminent correction by using both June and September 2020 cases. It's a comprehensive overview that connects the charts volatility , trends, divergences, credit, and currency strength.
The bond markets warned of a correction in the stock market a few days before June and September's correction. Bonds ripped to the upside a few days prior to the ES, NQ, and RTY correcting. The previous top and fall back in August 7th was due to the inflation scare by the PPE report.
BONDS OVER STOCKS 2020With equities looking increasingly volatility and valuations as frothy as ever, long term bonds have been quietly outperforming recently. I expect this trend to continue for foreseeable future and for us to rise 5-13% from here conservatively.
The global climate is shifting to reducing risk and buying safe haven assets. Therefore, 20 year bonds will likely continue to be a source that reaps the benefits of capital outflow from stocks and into US treasuries.