Backtests how tradingview mislead results with HL wicks orders ?Anybody could explain to me how to avoid a take profit order being filled on tops of wicks ?
In this example I'm backtesting AMD gettex whole history.
First of all I think this 900% wick is erroneous data. Then, I activated the option "After order is filled" and I'm backtesting the 1W timeframe.
This bug gets triggered often on stop sell orders. I think I managed to avoid it on limit buy by checking programmatically if bar's open is after or before. Kinda complicated to sort it out.
Bug
Buying Opportunity: Cloudflare (NET)Chart analysis is showing that Cloudflare (NET) is trying to form a bottom at an important Fibonacci level. Currently, there is momentum to the downside on the daily chart and a gap to be closed at 46.38. It's therefore likely that with the downward momentum, NET will attempt to close this gap and then quickly rebound up to 59 as it will also try to maintain price at or above this level for the monthly close. The weekly charts are already showing bullish signs and the asset's underperformance relative to the S&P 500 has already slowed down, which virtually always occurs right before a reversal. The Wave Trend Oscillator by @LazyBear shows that momentum to the downside on the highest timeframes is already bottomed and will soon start to revert back to the upside. On the daily chart, Heikin Ashi candles and Fibonacci Bollinger Bands also show signs of a bottoming pattern forming. The daily RSI has been showing bullish divergence since May. Therefore entering NET at prices around the gap closure at 46.38 could be a great risk-reward entry for long-term investors. Although anything is possible, it's statistically unlikely that NET will make a full retracement and fall much lower than the gap closure. In the years to come, Cloudflare will likely go to the moon.
Not financial advice.
TradingView Bug: Parts of indicator disappearingWhen an indicator uses Weekly values, parts fo the graph disappear when zooming into smaller time-frames (in this example: 4h and 1D).
It will display the graph up to the close of the previous week. However, the current Week (since it isn't closed anymore) disappears.
$BUG Good Cybersecurity BarometerIf you like the cyber security space, you can trade BUG or use it as a barometer as it's comprised of names such as PANW , CROWD ,ZS, etc.
I like this fund because... it's cheap. PANW is trading at almost $600 , options aren't cheap (JUN 620c is 28.4 or $2,840 a contract).
However if you wanted to go long on BUG JUN $32 calls they are trading at about 1.10 ($110) !
Technically, BUG has broken down from the upward channel and is currently trading below the weekly 30day moving average.
Bullish Scenario : Price breaks back into the upward channel , in which case an idea would to be go long with an initial PT of $38
Bearish Scenario : Price rejects at the channel / 30day moving average and we see the next leg down with an initial PT of $25
Of course, with each scenario one could go short / long in one of the individual stock names for a higher R/R trade
$BUGG INU. NEW ERA OF DeFiHi, traders!
Have you ever heard about DeFi? Some people, who don’t, I’ll surprise that you use it every day, buying or selling crypto. This sphere evolves exponentially. Today we’ll speak about one of the most exciting DeFi models – BUGG INU. While there are many decentralized crypto projects in the space, BUGG seems to stand out because of the unique innovations it wishes to introduce to the crypto and DeFi space.
BUGG INU was created on the 29th of May, 2021 and the project seems to be the fastest-growing project of its kind. BUGG is a decentralized autonomous yield generation protocol. Simply put, the model allows its users to earn its native token just using it.
The native token of the project is $BUGG. Each time a transaction is done, whether the token is bought or sold, you’ll get 2% of the transaction as fee. This model is much more beneficial than the traditional finance system.
Banks, for instance, may decide to give a certain percentage of interest to its users after a certain period. However, this interest is usually minute and is usually fixed no matter how many transactions occur.
The BUGG protocol on the other hand will grant more rewards to its holders if more transactions occur on the protocol. This extra passive income earned by users can be tracked via the user’s wallet balance, the price of the token and more.
To reduce supply and create scarcity of the token, Bugg burned 50% of its total supply. Additionally, another half of the redistribution fee will be burned to deflate the token. This burning mechanism will drive the value of the token up in the long run.
As you can see, BUGG’s philosophy looks like the quintessence of Ethereum with burning Gas and Pancake with its stacking. We will track this platform and tell you if it’s valid to use it.
Watch out for SilverSilver appears to be nearing the end of wave 2 (correction) and wave three to begin there after.
I think we could see a dip in the price down to $20.55 before rebounding sharply. If momentum is sustained look for it to touch $41
Silver could be the number #1 performing asset of 2021. In the larger scale we have the completion of a cup and handle formation that began 41 years ago.
Considering the years of silver price manipulation, we can analogize this to a coiled spring, bursting with potential energy.
Huge bullish sign in my view :)
Cyber Security has become essential for all"Because of the rise of remote working, cyberattacks have grown exponentially in recent months, with the FBI reporting a 400% increase in complaints in April versus March, as attackers hope to expose weaknesses in an organization's business continuity strategy"
Fundamental difference between some of the biggest cyber-security companies:
CrowdStrike's (CRWD) endpoint protection uses resource-friendly security agents to inform its crowdsourced cloud about any potential threat anomalies. All customers are protected based on a single threat found, and its technology is supported by having renowned threat remediation and hunting capabilities.
OKTA disrupted the identity access and management market with its cloud-based technology that has a large number of application integrations that make controlling who has access to what much simpler for security teams. In a perimeterless security world, the importance of identity is becoming paramount.
Zscaler's (ZS) secure web gateways delivered via its cloud locations provide customers a safe route to cloudbased resources. Branch and remote users can go directly to their applications instead of going through a centralized data center, decreasing lag for the end user and alleviating traffic bottlenecks for IT teams.
Palo Alto Networks (PANW) is an attractive option for investors. In our view, its cloud transition springboarding growth off its firewall leadership, upselling and cross-selling prospects via its security platform, and strong cash flow and balance sheet are being overlooked for the pure cloud-based companies.
EURUSD - Betting on democrats for the mid-terms elections - R/R!Expect 1.13 to hold, unless the Republicans get a majority in both chambers in the mid-terms this Tuesday, which is the less likely scenario.
Trade Setup :
Entry 1 : Market price (small lot size)
Entry 2 : Pending @ 1.1360
Stop : 1.12999
Target : 1.16 to 1.18
** Have a look at my other post for better overview ()
*** Don't hesitate to like and comment ;)
Parbolic SAR + RSI stategy [Highly dubious - Do NOT use this]Educational purposes only.
* CAUTION: THESE RESULTS ARE LIKELY VERY INCORRECT *
TradingView's backtester is quite broken. As you can see this strategy yields a laughable 95% success rate. In reality it's probably - at best - closer to half that or even less.
This is a demonstration reminder that people peddling get-rich-quick bots on Twitter etc are not to be taken at face value, do your research first as you can see how easy it is to forge very impressive results.
Use 'Replay' to step through the chart and you'll see a mismatch between the replay signals and the regular static/live data.
That aside, this strategy is actually a reasonable and interesting approach, I'd be keen to pursue it further if TV wasn't so uselessly untrustworthy.
You are of course free to use this in any way you like. But I'd strongly recommend using another platform to design your algorithms.