Get started

Dotcom

Dotcom Burst vs Tech Burst- i wanted to make this chart for long but i had to wait some confirmations, because i took an higher TF. - Right now is really interesting to compare the dot-com bubble burst in 2000 versus the actual situation. - like always i won't talk too much about FA because everything can happen in our world : - Aliens destroy us. - Putin push the red button. - Meteorite hits earth. - Jerome H. Powell printers no more electricity. - let's back to the chart and i will try to make it simple : - This chart is based on a 3 Months Timeframe, so 1 columns = 3 months. - This graph is based purely on MACD and his Death Cross ( i will call it "DC" to short it) The Dotcom Burst : 1/ in 2000, Nasdaq took a violent dip before MACD DC. ( 12 Months before ) ( Red Vertical Line ) 2/ after that MACD DC, Nasdaq continued his downtrend but the dip started to be lighter for 15 Months. (Orange Vertical Line) 3/ The Storm was over in 2002 and Nasdaq started a consolidation to prepare his next parabolic move. ( Green Vertical Line ) The Tech Burst : 1/ The real dip happened already 12 months from now (Before MACD DC). ( Red Vertical Line ) 2/ The MACD DC happened already 3+ months ago from now. ( Orange Vertical Line ) 3 / We are still in a downtrend and not yet entered a recovery phase. - What we can conclude is simple : - When MACD Death Cross. The big dip is already behind us. - Right now nothing is really different from 2000 in matter of TA, only the big numbers are different. - " Mastering trading is anticipating movements, following the flow in real time means you are already late ". Happy Tr4Ding ! PS : There's also something different in matter of time if u compare those charts. if you find it.. i will congratulate you !
NASDAQ:NDX
by thecryer
3
BIGGEST ECONOMIC CONTRACTION OF A LIFETIMEThe comparisons to the beginning of dot com are uncanny. I compared countless indicators and the current price action is identical to the dot com beginning. Additionally, the duration of the yield curve inversion is identical and the % of the drop is identical, almost to the decimal. The current contraction took 5x as long to reach this point as compared with the dot com. The dot com contraction took 2.3 years to hit bottom from the identified mark. Scaling the time, this correction could take 10 years (5 x 2) to reach bottom. We've enjoyed 15 years of a bull market (with some bumps along the road). Now, we are facing the most inverted yield curve in 40 + years. Time for the market to pay the piper. I fear this will be a recession we will share with our children in 20 years We are only at the start of this.
NASDAQ:NDX
by CuzinSam
AMAZON DOT COM CRASH PATTERN CONFIRMED ON BTC MUST SEE CHART.Take a look at this bearish scenario for BTC the dot com crash of 2000 the chart looks identical to btc right now, are we going to have 833 days of a bearish BTC with a 91% market correction? This chart is food for thought yes there are many bullish scenarios out there right now. Yes you may say but that is a stock and this is crypto. It has the same market sentiment as crypto fear and greed. 95% of all coins are sh*t coins with next to zero chance of success this downtrend would in fact shake out all the rubbish coins and make the market much more relevant. Leave your thoughts in the comments hope you enjoyed my 5 minues.
by WallStreetPremium
5
Dotcom compared to today's Cryptocurrency Market - Watch Out!An online survey of 1,338 Americans by Money Magazine in 1999 found that nearly one-tenth of dot-com investors had at least 85% of their money in internet stocks. Everyone, everywhere was daytrading dot-com stocks in late 1999. According to the Intelligent Investor, what many people feared was bumping into somebody at a barbecue who was getting even richer even quicker by daytrading dot-com stocks than they were. CNBC published the following headline on April 9th, 2021: Investors have put more money into stocks in the last 5 months than the previous 12 years combined . I was stunned by this. $569 billion has flowed into global equity funds in a period of only 5 months, compared with $452 billion going back to the beginning of the 2009-2020 bull market. Unadjusted to inflation, this equals to a 24x times shorter period! An online survey of 1,338 Americans by Money Magazine in 1999 found that nearly one-tenth of dot-com investors had at least 85% of their money in internet stocks. (src: The Intelligent Investor) In a survey conducted in a FB group with over 250k members by me, 71% of the candidates said they have more than 85% of their total investing portfolio fund allocated to cryptocurrencies. The second most voted answer accounted for 10% of the candidates having 6 - 10% of their portfolio allocated to cryptocurrencies. The FB cryptocurrency investing group grew from 37.5k group members in March, 2020 to around 250k currently. Representing an increase of 570% in users. Out of the data above we can conclude the average newcomer to cryptocurrencies isn't safely diversfied in different asset classes. In a more anonymous survey, almost 60% of candidates admitted they have between $1,000 and $10,000 invested in cryptocurrencies. 8% of candidates had less than $1,000 invested whereas a same percentage had $50,000 or more invested. See Graph: How much money people have invested in cryptocurrencies The following Medium article dates back to May 8th, 2018, 4 years ago: 12 Graphs That Show Just How Early The Cryptocurrency Market Is . It predicted the evolution of the cryptocurrency market partially with the beginning stage of the dotcom bubble. The article was a success and scored well on the accuraccy of the overall predictions. One of the metrics compared were cryptocurrencies unique addresses (users) that would grow from 25M to 80M in 2021. At the time of writing there are 78 million blockchain wallets: www.statista.com In comparison, internet users increased from 70M to 400M in 2000 at the time of collapse: www.researchgate.net On January 2022, we could witness bearish action as we enter a new 4-year cycle if we divide Bitcoin's cycles by longterm bearmarkets on the logarithmic scale: Thanks for reading this article, trade safe!
CRYPTOCAP:TOTAL
by jonathanvn
1
NDX (Nasdaq) one of the possible moves. Possibility of dotcom2.0Hey, this is one of the possible moves in of $NDX, the index is overbought and it needs to cool off, maybe we see a market crash (or just a big correction) in February 2022. Not financial advice. Do your own research. P.S I will be glad if this is not gonna happen. If this happens many people will lose their savings. P.P.S If we see market crash it will not be as 'light' as 2008 but more like as it was in 2000 (dot com crash) or even as hard as the Great Crash (1929 aka the Great Depression).
TVC:NDQ
by edgematic10
DOT, a good investment in the long term?Polkadot (DOT) is an innovative blockchain project that aims to create a secure interconnection infrastructure between different blockchains, while providing scalability and new functionalities to them. One of the recently created cryptocurrency projects that has caught everyone's attention is Polkadot (DOT). ¿The reason? This new blockchain technology scheme seeks to dethrone Ethereum with a vastly more scalable and efficient network. At the same time, it offers the possibility of interconnecting several blockchains and becoming an unparalleled cross-chain development hub. Undoubtedly, this makes Polkadot a plan with a very high goal and that leaves us with the following question: ¿Will it succeed? Well, in this article you will have the chance to learn all about this plan and answer for yourself, these and other questions about this spectacular plan. Polkadot, origin of this plan . The principles of this plan lead us to meet one of the leading figures in the crypto world, Gavin Wood. Wood is a well-known blockchain technology creator who was part of the Ethereum development team. By the way, Wood held the position of primary inventor of Ethereum, being at the same grade as Vitalik Buterin. A situation that denotes his understanding and work on this plan. It is thanks to Wood's work that Ethereum has the powerful Solidity programming language, which was developed by him. However, on January 11, 2016, Wood made the decision that it was time to leave and start his own plan, abandoning the Ethereum plan. At the time, Wood's initiative was to initiate a blockchain plan capable of overcoming Ethereum's weaknesses. In particular, its scalability and enabling novel cross-chain management constructs. Thus, by June 2016, Wood had already started working on this new plan, and in October 2016, he presented the first version of the Polkadot whitepaper to the world. This marked the beginning of this interesting plan, in which inventor Marek Kotewicz was also participating. From that moment on, the development of Polkadot would begin its path, until a larger proportion of attention would be focused on it. Something that, by the way, can be seen right now. Polkadot is one of the blockchain projects with the greatest growth in 2020 and the beginning of 2021. Initial funding of the plan . Gavin Wood started this plan with the financial support of his organization Parity and the Web3 Foundation, which he also helped to generate. Although, Parity and Web3 Foundation are referents within the entire Ethereum world, their collaboration in funding Polkadot is fundamental. However, the resources of the two organizations were limited as they were focused on Ethereum. This led to the execution of an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) that was done from October 15 until October 27, 2017. The triumph of the ICO has been extraordinary, being able to raise $143 million for the development of this plan. Shortly thereafter, however, this triumph would be put in serious jeopardy. A hack would cause Parity to lose well over $90 million on the Ethereum network. With its revenue severely diminished, the work path was rethought and Gavin Wood left in clear that Polkadot's work would continue. This was because there was enough money for the plan to succeed and the terms of the ICO would be respected. Additionally, Parity and Web3 Foundation sought to solicit support for a hard fork to recover the rest of the ETH blocked by the hack. The size received harsh criticism and the society opposed the execution of an action like the one granted after The DAO hack in 2016. This as they feared that this case will lead to a whole new incision in the society. ¿Result? The funds are still locked in the notorious Parity Bug, and there seems to be no way to get commented money out of that site. Polkadot, an extremely distinct blockchain network initiative . Now, Polkadot began its journey in Gavin Wood's mind as a network capable of giving the same abilities of Ethereum, simultaneously overcoming its weaknesses, and offering a sequence of unique properties. To be able to do this, Polkadot devised from its foundations a whole new set of technology and agreement protocols intended for that purpose. In the first instance, Polkadot was created with the performance of heterogeneous networks in mind, which could be interconnected. Thus, Polkadot could perform with 2 well-defined functionalities: As a data transmission and processing chain. A function that enables it to receive information from other chains, process that information and send it back to the chain of origin. This first choice makes it possible for Polkadot to become a scalability layer for any other blockchain that requires it. Free performance by building your own chains. That is, producing chains with their own abilities, such as the compatibility situation to carry out smart contracts or tokens. This enables the native management of decentralized applications (DApps) and tokens over the network that have the possibility to take full advantage of the network's potential. The initiative with all of the above is that Polkadot manages to become a scalability choice for networks such as Ethereum or other cryptocurrencies. In addition, it could also serve to interconnect various ecosystems in different blockchain all on the same network. This last case, as an example, can be seen with the DeFi, Equilibrium plan that lives in EOS. Relay Chain and Parachains, Polkadot's chain separation . Additionally, this management enables Polkadot to provide better stability, scalability through sharding and parallel execution in the network, which increases the overall performance of the network. At this point, it is essential to highlight the application of sharding in Polkadot. Recall that this computing technique divides the primary chain and the network into some sub-chains and sub-networks attached to it. Thus, each subchain has its own blockchain history, nodes, and all the elementary infrastructure for its management. In Polkadot in other words just what happens. The subchains in Polkadot are called parachain, which have the possibility of being seen as a sidechain or secondary chain, where a blockchain instance of its own is made. In other words, a parachain has its own blockchain or history, which holds its own reality of tokens, smart contracts, and nodes. In this way, this parachain has its own capacity and computational power to meet its own needs. The Relay Chain, however, is the primary chain of Polkadot, and it exists under the alliance of the history of each of the parachains running in parallel in the Polkadot network. This organization makes it feasible for Polkadot to achieve parallel smart contracts, and additionally, it enables greater scalability than recent blockchains. Additionally, this segmented functionality also enables the life of Bridges, with which the parachains have the possibility of opening communication with other blockchains (such as Ethereum, EOS or Bitcoin) and serve as a link with them. As parachains have the possibility of communicating with each other, this also makes it possible for several Bridges pointing to other blockchains to communicate, serving as cross-chain channels to make operations between them. In short, with Polkadot and its Bridges, it is feasible to interconnect Bitcoin and Ethereum (or other blockchains) at great speed, with greatly reduced prices without abandoning stability at any time. Smart contracts and tokens in Polkadot . Polkadot does not natively support smart contracts. This leaves aside the construction of tokens or DApps natively in the network. However, Polkadot parachains are extensible and modular, having the function of being able to generate abstraction layers that allow the execution of these smart contracts. When executed in a parachain, the effect of these contracts is reduced in terms of resource consumption to that parachain, leaving the rest of the system in common operation. This prevents, for example, that a high number of transactions in a parachain, degrades the performance of the rest of the system. Another great virtue of this system is that its handling, design, programming and deployment is much simpler. This has made Polkadot a much more secure network. Additionally, smart contract-capable parachains have the ability to activate alternative high-speed protocols that enable the execution of smart contracts with minimal effect on the overall Polkadot ecosystem. A case in point for this class of functions is EdgeWare, which has an expansion layer for Polkadot that enables the execution of Polkadot, including support for Ethereum smart contracts and its EVM. Additionally, there is also Ink, a development designed to build smart contracts that exploits the abilities of Substrate, an important section of Polkadot, and uses the secure programming language, Rust. Another highly relevant plan in this regard is Moonbeam, which enables a Polkadot parachain with these abilities, which implements a solution fully compatible with Ethereum's EVM, and with Web3 RPC API, giving each of the elementary instruments to programmers to take advantage of the potential of Ethereum smart contracts on Polkadot. Obviously, these are not the only resolutions for smart contracts in Polkadot's parachains, however they are a clear sample of the likelihood of making this technology easy to implement and much more so on the web. Organization of the network in Polkadot . Now to be able to do this kind of management, Polkadot has made a whole new network organization in which 4 resources stand out. These resources are: Validators The Polkadot network, like any blockchain network, has a set of validator nodes whose job is to review, validate and inform the network about the information contained in each block that belongs to the blockchain. These blocks come from the nominators, who are delegated to generate the candidate block to be examined and validated by the validators. Given the value of a validator, and the way Polkadot works, this position requires powerful hardware, high bandwidth, a dedicated connection to the network and, in addition, Polkadot validators have to block DOT tokens in order to qualify as network validators. However, he recalls that Polkadot is a network with segmented sharding performance and parallelism capability, which raises the computational power and connection requirements. Nominators Nominators, on the other hand, are a particular type of node whose job is to produce a secure link between the validators and the entire network performance process. The role of nominators is simple: to take transactions from the network, group them together and do the metadata generation process necessary for the validators to verify the same and include it within the Polkadot blockchain history. Undoubtedly this functionality is very similar to the Proof of Work (PoW) miners or Proof of Stake (PoS) validator nodes, and their functionality is practically the same in this sense. Additionally, the nominators issue to the validators the composition of a block will be examined by the validators, who will have the final say in issuing it and make it part of the Polkadot history. Classifiers This kind of nodes help the validators to keep a complete history of the parachain (Polkadot substring) to which they were assigned. Their job is to keep at all times the elementary information to generate new blocks in the parachain, which in the end will culminate in the complete Polkadot history. In classic situations, it will collect and execute transactions to generate a block and provide it, along with a zero proof of understanding (ZKP), to one or more currently causing validators who are suggesting a block in the parachain. Fishermen Given the sharding management of Polkadot, where there are different substrings that are part of a more complete history, an infrastructure designed to prevent malicious actors from cheating has been created. This composition is maintained by fishermen or fisherman. These nodes have the ability to search for duplicate transactions or illegal operations in the network, in order to avoid them, in exchange for a reward. The performance of these 4 parts is what enables the orchestration of the process of generation, verification, validation and issuance of blocks in Polkadot and its parachains. In addition, it is noteworthy that the communication between all these resources (between the subchains and the main chain) is completely asynchronous and parallel, ensuring a high speed of communication within the system. Consensus on the network . The resources that are part of the Polkadot network work in unison thanks to the Polkadot settlement protocol known as NPoS or Nominated Proof of Stake. This settlement protocol is intended as a slight alteration of the well-known Proof of Stake (PoS) protocol. In NPoS, validators have to provide the infrastructure and maintenance of the network. They are the ones causing the production of new blocks, the validation of parachain blocks, ensuring the target and ultimately the stability of the network. They have to be responsive at all times and realize a secure and reliable infrastructure. In addition, validators require tokens to back them up, which incentivizes them to perform with the rules, because otherwise part of those tokens could be taken away (a criterion called "cutoff"). For their services, validators are paid in rewards called in the native token of the underlying network. In order for validators to get to do their services for the network, they have to be in the active group. Validators in the active group take turns raising, validating and adding new blocks. On the other hand, nominators are token holders who contribute to the stability of the network by financially supporting (also known as "nominating") up to 16 validators of their choice with their tokens (also known as "participating"). Nominators share part of the rewards earned by the validators in the active group they nominated. It is essential to consider that nominators also remain subject to cuts in case of misconduct by one of their nominated validators. ¿How does it work? How does it work? NPoS can be equated to an election and was inspired by Phragmen's sequential procedure. This procedure was introduced at the end of the 19th century to optimize the voting of a group of a defined number of individuals from a larger group of candidates. Thus, the purpose of NPoS is to ensure decentralization and fair representation through justified proportional representation. And alongside that, to provide high stability through increased support. Proportional justified representation ensures that slots are allocated to validators in proportion to their nominations. Therefore, the more nominations and, ultimately, the larger the proportion of tokens that endorse a validator, the greater the chance that the validator will be chosen for the active group. Validators are ultimately chosen from each other. This means that the group of active validators changes in each Era. When validators are elected to the active group according to their nominations, the support grants a sharing of the nominated collaboration whereby each validator in the active group has about the same proportion of collaboration that supports it. This increases the overall stability of the network by increasing the stakes by supporting the "weaker links" of the validator group, which ultimately makes it more resistant to attacks. Distribution of rewards in NPoS In NPoS, all validators in the active group receive the same proportion of rewards. From these rewards, the validator's commission is inferred. The remaining rewards are distributed among the nominators in proportion to their collaboration. At this point, the system works identically to Proof of Stake (PoS). Token DOT, the economic heart of Polkadot . In order to retain management of the entire Polkadot network, this plan has developed a token named DOT. The purpose of this token is multiple. In the first instance, it serves the decentralized governance of the protocol. For this purpose, the DOT token gives the validators a voting power with which they have the possibility to participate in the elections and evolution of the plan. In addition, the DOT token serves to bind and incentivize validators to act honestly in the network. This is because they have a financial interest in the veracity of the verification process. Furthermore, Polkadot's parachains or subchains have the possibility of being created, joined or destroyed due to the DOT tokens. This undoubtedly gives great flexibility and maintainability to the network. b]Technical Analysis: Polkadot is a good project, but it is quite new, although it has good development and a strong community, besides being solid in terms of liquidity, it could attract our attention to invest in it in the long term. As we already know we have a strong economic crisis, DOT was born in the middle of a bullish rally, we do not know how it will behave in a downtrend which is the current one, but as always, we could expect a pullback to 0.786 Fibonacci and a little more. That would take us to test levels of 12.5 USDT-9 USDT. Which would be our long term buying zone. Although let's change the way we look at the possible bullish range testing zone. Actually this would be the floor, the behavior of DOT since the fall of BTC has been dramatic compared to other assets similar to it, having stronger pullbacks to those same assets, assuming BTC falls to 16k which is our buy zone I have said since March ¿Dot would be at 12 usd?, answering this question, currently DOT would need to lateralize and start trying not to go down as hard, but the current bitcoin price range towards 16k, suggests that DOT could get more bearish prices. In this situation, we could use the Gann fan to get an idea. The Gann Fan suggests that this price is the maximum of the fall, but personally, this time I will be a little wary of technical analysis and will make a range based on the Fibonacci Gold Ratio. Based on Ratio gold, we could have these 4 possible buying zones. Although it should be noted that I will prioritize from the range of 13 to 7.5 USD, as scalar purchases. Thus obtaining an average that would help us to avoid taking a bad position in the long term within this asset. And I will have a strong amount for the 5 USD value. Although it is a value that I believe we will not touch again, the POC of Volume suggests that this area will be in high demand. Regarding long term objectives. I would expect to reach a minimum value of 46.971 Ratio Gold in the long term, being a value of 65 USD. Up to a maximum of 75.88 Ratio gold, this being a value of 107.63. Finally, the RSI, still gives a possible range of fall to go to test levels 20-30 of RSI. You know that these charts are not designed to visualize the time when these values will be reached, we put the maximum rate to reach these values until 2030, being the most pessimistic. I really believe that DOT has performed poorly despite being liquid compared to other assets. However, I believe that its long term development, when 2024 halving begins, could represent a sign of a possible new upward cycle. In the meantime, I will review the project and its development in order to make up my mind and have more confidence in the asset to invest. Polkadot (DOT) is an innovative blockchain project that aims to create a secure interconnection infrastructure between different blockchains, while providing scalability and new functionalities to them.
Long
by UnknownUnicorn18500526
4
TESLA in 2020 vs APPLE in 2000, what if..I tried to compare the 2020 Telsa bull run vs apple during the dot com crisis what if we are in an EV bubble that is comparable to the dot bubble? could we predict how it will go this time? as we saw in 2000, the internet was intended to become a great thing, but not yet. what if the EV is intended to become a great thing, but not today? maybe in 20 years from now? I suggest you look for other stocks related to EV, green energy, and all the trendis right now, and by comparing those with the FAANG in the dot com bubble.
NASDAQ:TSLA
by camelot0707
1
DOTUSDT - price movement analytics! To new heights!Greetings to all crypto maniacs! Taking analytics to the next level! DOTUSDT - the coin moves inside an ascending channel. In a five-wave structure of growth. Now we see a correctional movement in wave 4, which has not yet been completed. Wave 4 levels are marked in yellow on the chart. The levels 14.92 and 13.46 are in the corrective movement. The level of the corrective movement of 14.92 has already been worked out. Upon completion of the corrective movement, the upward movement in the fifth wave is expected to continue to the levels marked in white on the chart. If we consider the correctional movement within the 4th wave, then it is not completed yet. And in case of breakdown of the lower trend line of the correction triangle, the continuation of the corrective movement is expected within the levels marked in yellow. That does not cancel the subsequent upward movement. Successful bidding! You know where to find more of my analytics and useful information! Join our community! Information in the page status! Thank you all for your attention! Don't leave without a like and a comment, and if you liked my analytics, subscribe, and you definitely won't miss anything! Disclaimer! I do not give entry and exit points. I share with you my opinions and ideas, which may differ from yours.
by CryptoYanina
1
Charting some of the big global events of the last 20 yearsI just wanted to add a few events to a chart of the S&P 500 and share some quick thoughts about them. The first and most obvious is just how strong this bull market has become. It's more than doubled its highs from the DotCom Bubble and the Great Financial crisis. The 2016 election and the COVID-19 crisis both barely put a dent into the price action. It is really hard to call tops and bet against the market. Only a few people in history have ever done it well. For me, when I see this chart, I just don't know how the market suffers another 20% drawdown again in the next 12 months. The COVID-19 crash seemed to be the big one. It wiped out a lot of "weak hands" and it also brought in a wave of new investors, mostly young and just getting started. The market would have to correct 30% just to get back to its prior COVID-19 lows. And so I am left wondering: has new bull market just begun? Are we at the stages of something like the DotCom Bubble? Do we need to climb even higher, say another 50%-100% before we can talk about an impending correction? The strength of this market is a site to behold. And the difference between the DotCom Bubble and the Financial Crisis was that those were structural, broad market moments that lead to devaluation and cycle reset. I'm not sure now is the time for a cycle reset because it seems the sudden transition to WFH, remote work, and immediate Fed supportive policy may actually be the start of the next cycle. This is on my mind and I'm thinking about it daily.
AMEX:SPY
by scheplick
14
Strange Correlation Between USD and African RandThe correlation between the African Rand and USD ( FX:USDZAR ) is super strange. During both the 2008 and 2016 crisis, we saw the African Rand pump an average of about 50%. Coming into 2020 we see the rand up about 35% with an expected 15-20% move up inbound. Do not trade this, this is my personal take on this and well... I definitely wouldn't take a 19 year old serious if I were you. Drop a comment and share your thoughts! Thanks DotcomJack
Long
by DotcomJack
1
KNOS is pumping and will hit $10. Change my mind.Here's the short version: Two decades of accumulation, textbook pre-ann insider buys, masterful chart-painting, and 5G-shielding pandemic masks. This pump has it all, and despite gaining 70,000% I am convinced it is just getting started! The entire thought process behind this prediciton isn't quite appropriate for this community, but I encourage you to seek it out via my profile. Finally, please explain how this prediction is flawed. Seriously, I can only see one scenario, and it can't be accurate.
OTC:KNOSLong
by darvshrp
3
BAC compared to SPX and NDX: Dot com top and bottomBerkshire Hathaway bought 33.9 million shares of the banking giant between Monday and Wednesday. That increased Berkshire's stake in Bank of America by $813.3 million to more than $24 billion. BRK holds 11.5% of BAC now. BAC chart compared to S&P500. Observe the top of both the NASDAQ and S&P BAC started bottoming when the 2 indices started falling. 2008 was a banking crisis which directly impacted BAC and it fell relatively harder than the indices. In 2020, Banks are well capitalised and backed by the FED, so chances of a banking crisis are slim. Add to that, NASDAQ is clearly overcooked at the moment(Check the historical chart. Top of the major trendline. That said, it Could also break up)
NYSE:BAC
by ashainp