Get started

Elliott Wave

MetaSo far Meta has been following the analysis very nicely. Price came up just short of the 1.618 extension and the 0.786 retracement fib of A. Since then, it has started to move lower and poked below the target box. We could technically get another poke higher to tag the 1.618 but it isn't required. We do have hidden bearish divergence on MACD as you see MACD made a higher high, but price did not. If we can start to get some overlap lower as well as breach the 1.0 @ $597.17, that will be a good sign that the top is in fact in. If we have topped, we should be looking to the $420-$320 area for the completion of minor C wave. Minor C should take around 2 months or so to complete if it is to follow the lead of A & B. I feel this is all pretty straight forward so I will leave it at that. Please let me know if you have any questions.
NASDAQ:META
by TSuth
1
SUI/USDT – Two Scenarios in Play: Impulse or Ending Diagonal?SUI is at a key decision point on the 4H chart. The current structure may either be: a classic impulse wave, with wave (5) still incomplete, or a bearish ending diagonal, suggesting the uptrend is losing strength. If this is an impulse, price could continue toward the upper boundary of the wedge to complete wave (5). However, if this is an ending diagonal, a sharp breakdown could target the support zone around $2.93, near wave (2). 📌 Stay cautious until a breakout or breakdown confirms the direction. 🕰️ Timeframe: 4H (Binance) 📉 Key support: $2.93
Short
by CakirInsights
Bitcoin : Impulse up or Flat Trap!?If you find this information inspiring/helpful, please consider a boost and follow! Any questions or comments, please leave a comment! BTC has staged a solid move off the May 25 low — but the context matters. We’re facing two distinct, high-stakes scenarios here: one bullish, one bearish. What happens next hinges on whether the May 25 rally is the start of a new impulse or the final leg (C wave) of an expanded flat off the all-time high. Structure Breakdown Bearish View: We’re completing a textbook expanded flat from the ATH: A wave started May 23 B wave pushed to a lower low. C wave began May 25 and is likely wrapping up now If valid, this sets the stage for a powerful Wave 3 down. Bullish View: The May 25 low marked the end of a corrective phase: Rally from that low is an impulsive Wave 1 A pullback to the 108k golden zone would represent Wave 2 Wave 3/C up could follow from that base What to Watch The area around 108,000–107,100 is a magnet. If price retraces into this zone with a corrective look and holds, bulls could be in control. But if we roll over hard from here, it supports the expanded flat thesis — and a much deeper move likely follows. Outlook This is a moment for sharpen focus. The chart structure is clean, but the outcome isn't binary until we see what kind of retrace (if any) forms. Watch 108k like a hawk. If bulls defend it, there’s room to talk new highs. If we break impulsively from here, expect acceleration lower — fast. Trade safe, trade smart, trade clarity.
COINBASE:BTCUSDShort
by CryptoKnee
1
TCS – From Correction to Acceleration?TCS appears to have completed a textbook Zigzag correction (A-B-C) ending at ₹3056.05 — right at the long-term trendline support that has held since 2020. From this base, the structure is now forming a clean impulsive sequence : Wave 1 topped at ₹3630.50 Wave 2 retraced to ₹3451.30, holding between 0.236–0.382 retracement zones The current rally may be the start of Wave 3, with fib projections targeting the ₹4025–4380 zone Supporting evidence: Strong RSI bullish divergence at the March low Breakout above ₹3630.50 would confirm Wave 3 ignition Invalidation: Break below ₹3056.05 would invalidate this count and suggest a larger correction. Tools Used : Elliott Wave, Fibonacci, RSI Timeframe : Daily Weekly timeframe view attached below for broader context: This is a technical analysis for educational purposes only and not financial advice. Part of the ongoing #WaveTracker series. Documenting Elliott Wave progression across major stocks.
NSE:TCSLong
by WaveXplorer
3
USDJPY – Targeting Structure Break for ABC Sell Setup 📉 USDJPY – Targeting Structure Break for ABC Sell Setup 📉 🔹 Timeframe: 30M 🔹 Methodology: Elliott Wave + AO + Structure Break + BBMA ⸻ 🔍 Current Market Outlook: I’m currently observing Wave 4 playing out as a complex correction. Price is pushing toward the key level 142.796, which I expect to break structure (BOS) to the upside. Once that level is cleared, I’ll be watching closely for signs of an ABC corrective move to form — setting up a high-probability sell opportunity aligned with the final Wave 5 leg. ⸻ 🧠 Key Technical Highlights: ✅ Wave Count: • Wave 3 is confirmed by the strongest momentum on the AO • Wave 4 is unfolding and approaching structure at 142.796 • AO shows decreasing bullish momentum, hinting at possible exhaustion ✅ Plan: • Wait for break above 142.796 • Monitor for completion of ABC correction • Enter short after C-leg confirmation • TP at 1.618–1.786 Fib extension zone (141.818–141.614) • Anticipating bullish divergence on AO by the end of Wave 5 ⸻ 📌 Confluence Checklist: ✔️ Wave theory ✔️ BOS expected ✔️ Fibonacci targets ✔️ AO divergence setting up ✔️ BBMA structure alignment ⸻ 🎯 Strategy Summary: Break 142.796 ➝ Spot ABC ➝ Enter short on C ➝ Ride Wave 5 ➝ TP @ extension zone ⸻ 💬 Share your thoughts—Are you seeing the same potential Wave 5 setup? Let’s discuss. 👉 Follow me for clean structure-based analysis, BBMA setups, and advanced wave insights. #USDJPY #ElliottWave #ForexSetup #WaveAnalysis #BBMA #AOindicator #MarketStructure #BreakOfStructure #SmartMoney #SellTheRally #Wave5 #ForexStrategy
Short
by AwesomeOscDad
GOLD → Consolidation. Retest of support before growthFX:XAUUSD is strengthening due to a complex fundamental backdrop. A false break of support at 3285 allows the price to update its local high to 3365. Gold fell moderately from a high of $3365 amid weak activity due to holidays in the US, despite the weak dollar. Investors are taking profits ahead of US inflation data. Pressure is also linked to hopes for a trade agreement between the US and Japan. However, the decline in prices is limited — geopolitical tensions, US budget problems, and instability in the Middle East are keeping demand for gold as a safe-haven asset. Support levels: 3321, 3308, 3300 Resistance levels: 3363 Technically, gold is making a false breakout of consolidation resistance and is entering a correction phase, during which the price may test liquidity below 3320-3303 before continuing to rise. Best regards, R. Linda!
FX:XAUUSDLong
by RLinda
10
USDCHF → Retest support with the aim of breaking throughFX:USDCHF is also losing ground amid the dollar's decline. The price is testing the support of the range, a break of which could open the way to 0.811 USDCHF is consolidating, but at the same time, a local downward channel is forming. The currency pair is retesting support within the current downward movement. A pre-breakdown consolidation is forming relative to 0.819. The fall of the dollar is having a corresponding effect on the price. Before continuing its decline, the currency pair may form a retest of 0.5 Fibonacci or close the FVG Resistance levels: 0.825, 0.8275 Support levels: 0.819, 0.8117 The downward structure will break down when the price leaves the downward channel. However, at the moment, while the price is consolidating at the bottom of the trading range, I expect a breakdown of support in the short term, followed by a continued decline to 0.811 - 0.805 Best regards, R. Linda!
Short
by RLinda
4
EUR/USD 1H AnalysisWhat we’ve got here on EUR/USD looks like a clean Elliott Wave setup shaping up. There’s a strong 5-wave move up that likely forms Wave 1, followed by a simple ABC correction — that gives us Wave 2. Now price is reacting from that C point, and this could be the beginning of Wave 3, which is usually the most powerful part of the trend. 🟩 Entry Zone: 1.114 – 1.12 🎯 TP: 1.14 🛑 SL: 1.109 ⚖️ Risk/Reward Ratio: 1:3 💡 Note: Always manage your risk and confirm with your own analysis before entering any trade. Keep an eye on it — could be a solid setup if it confirms. Drop your thoughts if you're trading this too 👇
by TheWaveHunter
1
EURUSD Breaking Above Resistance Line; Wave 5 In PlayEURUSD moved nicely higher in April, into the 1.15–1.16 area, a resistance where pair slowed down at the end of wave 3, that put retracement in play. However, a pullback has been made in three waves, so its seen as temporary within the broader uptrend. We saw some deeper retracement down to 1,1, near the 38.2% Fib from where we can see some nice turn up, above the trendline resistance so it appears that bulls are in play for wave 5. Therefore, be aware of more upside afte some intraday dips. Support is at 1.1266 area. GH
by ew-forecast
Sideways Still in Play for ETH After RejectionIf you find this information inspiring/helpful, please consider a boost and follow! Any questions or comments, please leave a comment! Recap Ethereum just tapped into a key Area of Interest and got rejected. The move confirmed short-term resistance while keeping the broader wave structure intact. Although no clear breakdown has followed, the rejection signals that the asset is still mid-cycle. The expectation now is for a sideways consolidation. This aligns with a developing wave 4, but the price action ahead will determine how this structure unfolds. Wave Structure At present, the count favors a completed wave 3 followed by a wave 4 that is still forming. The rejection at the AOI fits the narrative of a corrective structure underway. Whether that plays out as a triangle or a flat will depend on how the next legs print. Key markers are in place: AOI was respected No breakdown of the prior key support level Above the 0.382 to 0.5 retracement zone remains in focus as a reaction area Should price expand beyond typical retrace/time boundaries, the degree of the count may need to be adjusted. A more complex correction or a deeper reset could shift the current interpretation from a wave 4 into something more substantial. Outlook • Rejection confirms resistance • Expecting sideways movement to continue • Watching the 0.382 to 0.5 zone for key price behavior • Price action will determine the next wave structure • If momentum expands rapidly, degree reassessment is on the table Ethereum’s current posture suggests a market in digestion mode. Whether this leads to a launch into wave 5 or deeper corrective behavior, the next prints will be critical. No confirmation of bullish continuation yet. More updates soon as the next leg develops. Trade safe, trade smart, trade clarity.
COINBASE:ETHUSDLong
by CryptoKnee
BTCUSD (15m) – Wave 12345 Completed with Bullish Divergence & SN🕒 Timeframe: 15-Minute 💰 Pair: BTC/USD ⸻ 🔍 Wave Structure & Momentum Analysis Using Elliott Wave Theory, we can clearly identify a completed 5-wave impulsive move down: • (1) → (2) → (3) → (4) → (5) • Wave (5) completes with a bullish divergence against the Awesome Oscillator (AO), signaling weakening bearish momentum. • Both price and AO show a clear divergence between wave (3) and wave (5), hinting at a possible reversal or corrective phase. ⸻ 🔁 Break of Structure & SNR Zone • Price is currently reacting to a key Support-turned-Resistance (SNR) level around 107,724. • A confirmed break and close above this SNR will mark a break of structure, strengthening the bullish case. • I will wait for the price to close above 107,724 on the 15M timeframe to confirm this break. ⸻ 🧠 What’s Next? ABC Retracement for Entry • Upon break of structure, I will look for a nearest bullish Supply & Demand (SND) zone as a potential entry point. • Ideally, I will wait for an ABC corrective retracement (after the break) to enter long. • Entry will be placed at the base of the SND zone formed during the corrective leg. ⸻ 📌 Trade Plan Summary • ✅ Wave 12345 completed (impulse wave down). • ✅ Bullish divergence confirmed with AO. • ⚠️ Watching for break and close above 107,724 (key SNR). • 🔎 If broken, wait for ABC correction into SND zone to initiate long position. • 🎯 Target: Mid to Upper structure zone based on previous supply. • ❌ Invalidation: If price fails to break above 107,724 or breaks below recent swing low (wave 5), setup is void. ⸻ 📈 Technical Confluence • Elliott Wave Count • AO Divergence • Break of Structure (BoS) • SNR Level • Awaiting ABC Pullback into SND ⸻ 💬 Let me know what you think! Are you seeing the same structure? Waiting patiently for confirmation before entering. #BTCUSD #ElliottWave #BreakOfStructure #SupplyAndDemand #AO #CryptoAnalysis #SmartMoney #15MinChart
BITSTAMP:BTCUSDLong
by AwesomeOscDad
1
BTC/USD Technical Analysis (8H Timeframe)📊 BTC/USD Technical Analysis (8H Timeframe) ✅ Wave Count Summary ✅ The 5-wave impulse structure is clearly completed. Wave I to V is visible and respected the Fibonacci zones. Now transitioning into an ABC corrective phase, typically part of an A-B-C Zigzag. 🔻 Current Move: Wave A The price has started correcting from the Wave V top (~$112,000). Wave A has begun and is expected to target the 0.382 Fibonacci retracement level, which aligns at: 🎯 Immediate downside target: ~$102,000 This corresponds to: Former support/resistance zone A typical Wave A correction target in early stages 🔁 What Happens Next After Wave A completes (~$102,000), expect a relief bounce into Wave B, potentially retracing 50–61.8% of Wave A Then another drop into Wave C toward deeper Fib levels like: 0.618 level = ~$88,800 0.786 or 0.88 might come into play for full ABC correction (~$78,000–$74,000) 🔍 Structure & Confirmation Wave A breakdown is impulsive (bearish) Break below previous Wave IV (~$106,000) gives confirmation of short-term trend reversal RSI and momentum indicators (if added) would likely show bearish divergence at Wave V top 📉 Short-Term View Direction Target Note ⬇️ Wave A ~$102,000 0.382 retracement zone 🔁 Wave B ~$106,000 Possible lower high bounce ⬇️ Wave C ~$88,800 0.618 Fib — final correction 🧠 Conclusion BTC completed a textbook short-term 5-wave impulsive move and is now entering a corrective phase (ABC). Wave A is underway with an immediate target around $102,000, followed by a likely bounce (B) and then further downside (C). ⚠️ Disclaimer: This analysis is intended for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Please perform your own research or consult a licensed financial advisor before making trading decisions. Trading involves substantial risk and is not suitable for all investors.
COINBASE:BTCUSDShort
by shiva560060
2
NIFTY50.....New high's, then correction?Hello Traders, The week started at 25,058 — the week's high — and has declined since then. It bottomed out at around 24,462. This move probably ended wave w (pink), or it could have been the entire wave iv (blue). Chart analysis: If it was all of wave iv (blue) the next move will be up to a new high in the coming week. However, a drop around the 24789 range could be possible. If thereafter a wave v (green) ends, a target area is @ 24970.50! If so to come, one target range is around the 25081 level. Here a wave v(green) of ((i)) (pink) ends! While the last move look like a "triangle" 2 in progress, it is my favorite pattern. But note! The last move, possible wave w (pink) has ended below the wave a low (not shown). That means "danger for the bears"! The bears need to watch the chart closely! If this move, though unexpected, was all of the pattern, the door should be open to new corrective lows in the coming week. Here, one price target is around the 24506 area. That would just correct a 0.618, but still possible! Another target is around 24260 area. Here wave y=w! Anyway! The targets have been set for the coming week, and we will see and watch the chart closely! Good luck to all traders! Have a great week..... Ruebennase Please ask or comment as appropriate. Trade on this analysis at your own risk.
NSE:NIFTY
by ruebennase
5
#SUGAR The Sweet Life is Over. A Forecast for 2025-2040Hello colleagues! Today (May 25, 2025), another article on food and the commodities market will be released, specifically focusing on sugar ICEUS:SB1! To all newcomers, welcome to my virtual den, where I dissect markets without rose-tinted glasses or any of that nonsense peddled by infogurus and mainstream analysts. This article will be long and a bit tedious, where we'll first need to quickly skim through the history of this commodity to identify the main pricing trends over the last ten centuries. Then, we'll somehow link old data and translate it into current money. And all this must first be done to understand the overall picture of the development of sugarcane and then beet sugar production, and to have at least some idea of how its price fluctuated, so that in the end, we can get a more or less objective analysis with a forecast for the next 10-15 years. In other words, to more clearly understand what awaits us in the future, we must first study the past. The text will be divided into three smoothly flowing parts: 📘 Historical Data 📊 Charts and Forecast for 2025-2040 📝 Geopolitical Scenario of Events 📖 So, let's go. A very brief history of the sugar industry over the last 1000 years: ◽️ 11th-15th Centuries (1000-1500): Spread from Asia and Medieval Europe Origin in South Asia: Sugarcane was first cultivated in South Asia (likely India) long before this period. By the 11th century, the technology for producing unrefined sugar was relatively developed in this region. Sugar originated in South Asia, where, apparently, someone was so fed up with bland life that they decided to sweeten it. And so it began... Spread to the Middle East and Mediterranean: Arab conquests facilitated the spread of sugarcane and its processing technologies to the Middle East, North Africa, and some regions of the Mediterranean (e.g., Sicily and Spain). Rare and Expensive in Europe : In medieval Europe, sugar remained a rare and extremely expensive commodity, accessible only to nobility and wealthy merchants. It was primarily used as a spice and medicine. Sugar trade was controlled by Arab and Italian intermediaries. Sugar was so valuable that it was not only eaten but also used as medicine. Probably, out of a sense of its own importance. ◽️ 16th-18th Centuries (1500-1800): Expansion into the New World and the Era of Slavery Transfer of Production to America: European colonizers began actively developing sugarcane plantations in the tropical and subtropical regions of the New World (Caribbean, Brazil). Europeans realized sugar wouldn't grow in the Old World and decided to create their "sweet El Dorado" in the New World. With other people's hands, of course. Key Role of Slavery: Sugar production was closely linked to the transatlantic slave trade. Vast numbers of Africans were forcibly transported to colonies to work on plantations. Brutal working conditions were the norm. Slavery and sugar – these were the two inseparable "partners" of that era. Sweetness was built on others' bitterness. Caribbean – Production Hub: The Caribbean islands became the main global center for sugarcane production. Sugar expansion went hand in hand with colonial expansion. Europeans weren't just discovering new lands; they were looking for more places to plant this damn cane. High Value of Sugar: Sugar remained an expensive and prestigious commodity, mainly accessible to the upper echelons of society in Europe. It was used as a sweetener, spice, and even medicine. Increased Accessibility in Europe: Increased production in the colonies made sugar more accessible in Europe, though it still remained relatively expensive. Discovery of Beet Sugar: In the 18th century, sucrose was discovered in sugar beet, laying the groundwork for an alternative source. ◽️ 19th Century (1800-1900): The Beet Sugar Revolution and Abolition of Slavery Triumph of Sugar Beet: A key development was the growth and spread of sugar production from sugar beet in Europe. The discovery by chemist Andreas Marggraf in the 18th century and subsequent developments led to the creation of industrial technology. This allowed European countries to reduce their dependence on colonial cane sugar. Beet replaced cane like diesel replaced steam — less romantic, but far more efficient. Colonial planters gnashed their teeth. Abolition of Slavery: Throughout the 19th century, slavery was gradually abolished in most colonies, leading to changes in labor organization on cane plantations. The abolition of slavery, of course, was an act of humanitarianism, but it also hiked production costs. Free labor, you know, costs money. Increased Production and Price Decline: Thanks to beet sugar, overall global sugar production increased significantly, leading to a gradual decline in prices and making it more accessible to broader segments of the population. Development of Transport Infrastructure: The construction of railways and steamships facilitated the transportation of both cane and beet sugar. Emergence of the Sugar Industry: Large sugar factories and companies specializing in sugar production and trade were formed. ◽️ 20th-21st Centuries (1900-Present): Globalization, Technologies, and New Challenges Market Globalization: Global sugar trade became intensive, and international agreements emerged. Development of Agrotechnologies: Mechanization, variety selection, and fertilizers dramatically increased yields. Dominance in the Food Industry: Sugar became a key ingredient in the production of a vast number of food and beverage products. Today, sugar is crammed everywhere – from ketchup to bread. Apparently, manufacturers believe our lives aren't "sweet" enough without it. Consumption Growth: Sugar became an integral part of diets in many countries, used in the food industry to produce a huge variety of products. Focus on Sustainability and Health: Modern trends include combating overconsumption, seeking sustainable production methods, and developing the market for alternative sweeteners. ◽️ 21st Century (2000-Present): New Trends and the Future Combating Overconsumption: Governments and health organizations in many countries introduce measures to limit sugar consumption (e.g., taxes on sugary drinks, product labeling). Combating overconsumption? That's like tobacco companies releasing "light" cigarettes. Hypocrisy in its purest form. Growing Demand for Natural Sweeteners: Consumers show greater interest in natural sugar alternatives such as stevia, erythritol, xylitol. Market Volatility: Sugar prices remain subject to fluctuations due to weather conditions, political factors, and changes in global supply and demand. Biotechnologies: Research in biotechnologies may lead to new ways of producing sugar or its substitutes. 📌 Summary: Over the last 1000 years, sugar has come a long way from a rare Eastern spice to one of the most common commodities in the world, playing a significant role in the history of trade, colonization, slavery, and the development of the food industry. Today, the industry faces new challenges related to consumer health and production sustainability. Corporations first cram us with sugar, and then preach about a healthy lifestyle. Funny, isn't it? This brief history shows how the sugar industry has gone from an exclusive colonial commodity produced by slave labor to a global industry with many players and challenges. ⬜️ We've covered the very condensed history of sugar production and the general development of the global sugar industry. Now, for a broader understanding, it's also useful to know how pricing has changed over the last few centuries. Over the past 400 years, sugar prices have undergone significant fluctuations influenced by many historical events. Here are the key moments that had a substantial impact: Era of Colonialism and Slave Trade (16th-19th centuries). Expansion of Plantations in the New World and Reduction of Production Costs and Prices: From the 16th century, European powers actively developed sugarcane plantations in their colonies in the Caribbean and South America. The massive influx of cheap (virtually free) slave labor from Africa led to a significant increase in sugar production. Mass production using slave labor made sugar more accessible in Europe, though it still remained a relatively expensive commodity. Napoleonic Wars (early 19th century). Disruptions in Cane Sugar Supplies and Development of Beet Sugar: Conflicts in Europe disrupted maritime trade routes and sugar supplies from colonies. The need for alternative sources led to the active development of sugar production from sugar beet in continental Europe. This was an important step towards reducing dependence on cane sugar and laid the groundwork for future price reductions. Abolition of Slavery (19th century). Increased Production Costs: The gradual abolition of slavery in the colonies led to increased labor costs on cane plantations, which could temporarily raise prices. However, it also stimulated the search for more efficient agricultural methods. Development of Production and Transportation Technologies (19th-20th centuries). Mechanization, Variety Selection, Agrotechnologies, and Transport Improvement: The introduction of steam engines and other equipment in sugar mills and on plantations significantly increased production efficiency. The development of railways and steamships made it easier and cheaper to transport sugar both within countries and between continents, contributing to price reduction. Improvements in sugarcane and beet varieties, as well as the development of agronomic methods, led to increased yields. World Wars (20th century). Government Regulation and Disruptions in Production and Trade : Both World War I and World War II disrupted agricultural production, transport networks, and international trade, leading to shortages and rising sugar prices. During wars, governments often imposed price controls and rationing of sugar. Government Policy and Trade Agreements (20th-21st centuries). International Sugar Agreements, Subsidies, and Tariffs: Government support for domestic sugar beet producers and the imposition of import tariffs on cane sugar in several countries artificially maintained higher prices in the domestic market. Attempts to regulate the global sugar market through international agreements had mixed success but influenced price stability. Changes in Supply and Demand (20th-21st centuries). Consumption Growth, Weather Conditions, and Ethanol Production Development: Increased global population and changing dietary habits (growing consumption of processed foods and beverages) led to increased demand for sugar. Droughts, floods, and other adverse weather events in key producing regions can significantly reduce harvests and cause sharp price increases. In Brazil, a significant portion of sugarcane is used for ethanol production. Changes in oil demand and prices can affect sugar production volumes and, consequently, its price. Emergence of Sugar Substitutes and Changes in Consumer Preferences (late 20th - early 21st century): Increased awareness of the harm of excessive sugar consumption led to a growing demand for alternative sweeteners, which can have a dampening effect on sugar price increases. Consumers' growing desire for healthier lifestyles and reduced sugar consumption may, in the long term, affect demand and prices. ◻️ These key historical moments illustrate the complex interplay of political, economic, social, and technological factors that have shaped the price of this important commodity over centuries. So, from the above factors, we can identify general trends: 1200-1500s: During these centuries, sugar in Europe was an exotic import, mainly from the Middle East and Mediterranean regions. It was a luxury item, costing very dearly in relation to precious metals like silver. The amount of sugar one could buy for an ounce of silver was negligible. 1500-1600s: With the beginning of sugarcane cultivation in the New World, especially by the Portuguese and Spanish, sugar supply in Europe gradually increased. However, it remained relatively expensive. 1600-1700s: The expansion of sugar plantations in the Caribbean, based on slave labor, led to a more significant increase in sugar production and availability in Europe. This era likely marked a more noticeable decline in sugar's price relative to silver compared to previous centuries. Research shows that in the latter part of this period, especially in places like London and Amsterdam, more detailed price records, expressed in silver weight per kilogram of sugar, began to appear. 1700-1800s: The trend of increasing sugar production and declining relative price likely continued into the 18th century. The growth of colonial economies, largely based on sugar production, made it more accessible. 1800-1900s: The 19th century witnessed the rise of beet sugar production in Europe and further expansion of cane sugar cultivation. This led to a significant drop in sugar prices relative to precious metals. Silver retained its value, while sugar became a mass-market commodity. By the end of this period, a significant amount of sugar could be bought for an ounce of silver compared to earlier centuries. 2000s: In the modern era, sugar is a widely produced and relatively inexpensive commodity. The amount of sugar that could be bought for an ounce of silver would be very substantial compared to any of the earlier periods. The general trend shows a sharp decline in the relative price of sugar to silver over recent centuries, from an extremely rare and expensive commodity to a widely available one. The most significant shifts occurred after the colonization of America and the rise of beet sugar production. ⬜️ So, to get at least some approximate idea of changes in sugar prices over the past few centuries, let's try to mentally exchange weight for weight, i.e., exchange the commodity – SUGAR – for eternal real money – SILVER. To do this, we need to extract historical data on sugar price changes on the London and Amsterdam exchanges from 1650 to 1820. For analysis, I've used a chart of refined sugar , which is more stable and shows prices in London and Amsterdam from 1650 to 1820, expressed in grams of silver per kilogram of sugar . That is, the chart shows how many grams of silver one kilogram of sugar cost. If you carefully study the chart, you can conclude that the price of refined sugar in London from 1650 to 1790 was relatively stable, fluctuating around 10-15 grams of silver per 1 kg of sugar. In such cases, one could say that 1 kg of sugar in London cost 0.3-0.5 ounces of silver. Let's convert this to current money: 🧮 Conversion to ounces: One ounce contains 31.1035 grams of silver. If 1 kg of sugar cost 10 grams of silver, that is 10 / 31.1035 ≈ 0.32 ounces of silver per 1 kg of sugar. If 1 kg of sugar cost 15 grams of silver, that is 15 / 31.1035 ≈ 0.48 ounces of silver per 1 kg of sugar. 🧮 Conversion to current money: As of today, the price of one ounce of silver is approximately 33 US dollars. If 1 kg of sugar cost 0.32 ounces of silver, then in current money terms, it would be 0.32 * 33 ≈ 10.56 US dollars per 1 kg of sugar. If 1 kg of sugar cost 0.48 ounces of silver, then in current money terms, it would be 0.48 * 33 ≈ 15.84 US dollars per 1 kg of sugar. Summary: Based on the assumption that in the 1700s, 1 kg of refined sugar in London cost, on average, between 10 and 15 grams of silver, and using the current silver price, one can roughly estimate the cost of 1 kg of sugar in London to be equivalent to approximately $10.56 to 15.84USD, which is very expensive compared to the current 0.40/kg. It is important to emphasize that this is a very rough estimate and it does not account for many factors, such as: Purchasing power of silver in the 1700s: Silver had a completely different purchasing power 300 years ago compared to today. Gold to silver ratio: Today, the gold to silver ratio is much higher than in the 18th century, and for the last 20 years, it has fluctuated around ⚖️70-100:1, compared to when it was around ⚖️15:1 then. This indicates that silver is 5-6 times cheaper relative to gold now than it was in the 1700s-1800s. Quality of sugar: Refined sugar 300 years ago might have differed in quality from modern sugar. Regional differences: Prices could vary significantly in different parts of the world. Transportation costs and taxes: These factors could significantly affect the final price of sugar. Nevertheless, the calculation provides some insight into how expensive refined sugar was in those times compared to today, when it has become a much more accessible commodity. ◻️ Let's continue. Analyzing these two historical charts, it's also worth commenting on the jump in the price of refined sugar on the London exchange during the Napoleonic Wars (early 1800s) to around 20 grams of silver per 1 kg of sugar. Based on historical contexts and general trends of commodity markets during wars, it's important to say that military conflicts often lead to disruptions in trade routes, commodity shortages, and, as a consequence, rising prices. Now let's convert the maximum price of those distant times into current money: 🧮 Price in silver: 20 grams per 1 kg of sugar. Conversion to ounces: 20 grams / 31.10 grams/ounce ≈ 0.64 ounces of silver per 1 kg of sugar. Conversion to US dollars (at current silver price): 0.64 ounces * $33/ounce ≈ $21.22 US dollars per 1 kg of sugar. 📌 Thus, if we assume that the price of refined sugar in London during the Napoleonic Wars indeed rose to 20 grams of silver per 1 kg, then in current money terms, this would amount to approximately $21 US dollars per 1 kg of sugar. Consequently, the conclusion about a range of $20-23 US dollars per 1 kg of sugar in current money for peak prices during the Napoleonic Wars seems quite reasonable, based on the analysis of the historical chart and the current silver price. This once again emphasizes how expensive sugar was in those times compared to today. And here, we won't even attempt to fairly equalize the cost of sugar further by adjusting the silver to gold ratio to its normal historical values of ⚖️20:1, as that would then require multiplying $20-23 US dollars by another five times. The gold/silver ratio of 100:1 today is a slap in the face of history, when silver was valued much higher. This is another sign of the impending revaluation of everything! But nonetheless, we can make a modest mark on the current price chart, where approximately $23 is the ATH (all-time high) since the early 1800s. ⬜️ Silver is noble, of course, but let's come down to earth and look at prices in the currency we (still, for now) all pay with 💵💶. Another historical chart I found online (on Trading Economics) provides a historical chart of sugar prices from 1912 to the present, displaying data in cents per pound. Evaluating sugar prices in US dollars since the creation of the Federal Reserve System (Fed) is more justified than theoretical calculations with conversions to current money, and for good reasons. Here's why: 1. Objectivity of historical data in US dollars: ▫️ Actual market prices: The chart displaying prices in cents per pound from 1912 to the present represents a record of actual market prices that prevailed in the US during that period. This data reflects the real supply and demand relationship, as well as the impact of various economic and political events at that time. ▫️ Avoiding conversion problems: Converting old prices in grams of silver to modern dollars involves many complexities and assumptions related to changes in currency purchasing power and the relative value of commodities over centuries. US dollar data, recorded at that historical moment, is a more direct reflection of sugar's value in the economy of that time. 2. Significance of the US dollar after the Fed's creation: ▫️ Currency stabilization (relatively): The Federal Reserve System was created in 1913 to ensure the stability of the US financial system. Although the US dollar has experienced inflation and devaluation since its creation, its value has been more centrally regulated compared to previous periods when the banking system was more decentralized and prone to panics. ▫️ World reserve currency: The US dollar gradually became the world's reserve currency, especially after World War II. This makes prices expressed in US dollars more significant for understanding global trade and the value of commodities, including sugar, in the long term. ▫️ Data comparability: Using the US dollar as a single currency to track prices over a long period (from 1912 to the present) ensures better data comparability and allows for a clearer view of the real dynamics of sugar prices within one economic system. 3. Limitations of theoretical calculations: ▫️ Changing purchasing power: Converting prices expressed in silver weight in the 1700s to modern dollars using the current silver price does not account for the vast changes in the purchasing power of both silver and the dollar over the past centuries. Silver in the 18th century might have had a completely different value relative to other goods and services than it does today. ▫️ Different economic systems: The economic systems of the 18th and 21st centuries differ fundamentally. Comparing prices directly, based solely on the current exchange rate, is incorrect, as it doesn't account for living standards, average incomes, the cost of other goods and services, etc. ▫️ Sugar market specifics: The sugar market over the past centuries has undergone enormous changes in production, trade, regulation, and consumption. Theoretical conversions cannot always adequately reflect these transformations. 📌 Conclusion: Using historical data on sugar prices, expressed in US dollars since the Fed's creation, is indeed a more objective and justified approach for analyzing the long-term dynamics of this commodity's prices in the American and global economy. This data reflects actual market conditions and avoids many complexities and assumptions associated with converting prices from other currencies or commodity equivalents (e.g., silver) into modern dollars. In short, today, trusting old prices in silver is like trying to understand Bitcoin's exchange rate from Sumerian tablets. Dollar data is at least somewhat anchored to the reality of the last hundred years. But nonetheless, all these data provide a general overview and a broader understanding of sugar price fluctuations over the past 300 years, and the closer the data is to our time, the more accurate and objective it is. 📈 Chart: La dolce vita è finita Okay, enough digging in the dust of centuries. Let's look at live charts where the past screams about our future! I tried to combine a linear historical chart showing the price in cents per pound with a logarithmic chart of ICEUS:SB1! So, first, we need to highlight the following: from 1912 onwards, there was generally a decline in sugar prices, where from peak values of around 20 cents per pound of sugar in 1919, the price decreased for a long time, reaching a minimum in 1966 at 1.3 cents. In half a century, from 1919 to 1966, sugar prices fell by -93%, after which they began to reverse (correct) upwards. Then, from 1966 to 1974, the price surged by +4000%, meaning that in just eight years, the price rose 40-fold from its 1966 lows to its 1974 highs. This wave of growth, within the framework of Elliott Wave Theory, should be regarded as the first corrective wave (A) . Next, from 1974 to the present day, a narrowing sideways consolidation has been developing, which can safely be interpreted as a wave (B) triangle . Roughly speaking, for the last 50 years, sugar prices have been "marinating" in a narrowing sideways range, which is highly likely to complete the formation of all internal waves in 2025-2026. After which, another explosive wave of growth within wave (C) of the presumed corrective zigzag, developing since 1966, should be expected, with targets around three dollars per pound of sugar. For the expected sharp rise à la 1966-1974, a time frame up to 2040 is allocated, i.e., 15 years, but the price surge could happen faster. The broad range highlighted above, $1-5 per pound of sugar, is an approximate target to aim for over a 10-15 year horizon. In other words, over the next 10-15 years, a sharp jump in sugar prices of approximately +1000-2000%, or 10-20 times, should be expected. 📈 Additional analysis of Cocoa and Coffee charts Few people today realize that we are entering a new 10-20 year supercycle of growth in the commodity sector and a decline/sideways movement in the high-risk stock market. And as examples to my assertion that "the sweet life" is over, it's worth considering two additional commodity charts: specifically, cocoa and coffee. These three commodity charts: ICEUS:SB1! , ICEUS:CC1! and ICEUS:KC1! , traded since the 1970s-1980s, are very similar in their wave structure, which can all be equally marked as a large 40-50 year narrowing sideways consolidation. The main difference is only that the price of cocoa has already sharply surged upward from its forty-year sideways range by +480% since late 2022, while the price of coffee is only trying to consolidate above its resistance zone, which began forming in 1977. Since early 2024, coffee prices have also shown an explosive growth of +200%. These two commodity charts indirectly indicate the future direction for sugar prices as well. But as always, there's a small "but." Locally, within a year or year and a half (2025-2026), against the backdrop of officially recognized recession, stock market collapse, liquidity problems in the eurodollar system, and economic downturn in developed Western economies, a correction in the food commodity market of -30-40% should first be expected. Only after the money printer is turned on (QE), can we confidently expect a new wave of growth across the entire commodities market and a new wave of inflation, respectively. Coffee and cocoa have already shown which way the wind is blowing. Sugar is next on the runway. The rise in coffee, cocoa, and sugar prices, and indeed the expected wave of price increases in the commodities market in general, should not be viewed as a local and seemingly unrelated increase in the prices of food commodities, raw materials, and precious metals against the US dollar, but rather as the depreciation of money in an era of global debt crisis culmination, geopolitical instability, high inflation, and the reformatting of the old liberal world order. With the transition to a new digital economy, a new currency world, and a new world order. 📈 Analyzing the Main Chart Let's move on. Now it's time to switch to more familiar units of measurement and weight for residents of Europe. For this, the main live chart presented displays the price of sugar in dollars per kilogram. On this chart, for a general understanding of price dynamics, we should mark two points: 1800 and 1966. To determine the minimum price in 1966, let's solve a small problem: 🧮 We know that the minimum price in 1966 was 1.3 cents per 1 pound. 1 pound = 0.4535 kilograms. First, let's find the cost of 1 kg in cents: 1.3 cents / 0.4535 kg ≈ 2.86 cents per kg. Now, let's convert cents to dollars: 2.86 cents / 100 = 0.0286 dollars per kg. Thus, 1.3 cents per pound is equivalent to approximately 0.0287 dollars per kilogram of sugar in 1966. So, let's establish this: around 1800, the price of refined sugar on the London exchange reached its peak (ATH), which is equivalent to approximately $21-23 US dollars per 1kg when converted to current money. And in 1966, the minimum price for sugar in the USA was a pproximately $0.03 per 1kg . Thus, two important time points with approximate prices have been determined: 📍 1800 (ATH): ≈ $23 per 1 kg 📍 1966 (minimum): ≈ $0.03 per 1 kg 📍 2025 (present): ≈ $0.40 This shows a colossal difference in sugar prices over this period, reflecting changes in production, trade, accessibility, and the purchasing power of money. Sugar, from a relatively expensive commodity in the early 19th century, became significantly cheaper by the mid-20th century. ◻️Now, let's solve one last problem that will finally put all the pieces together: how much did one kg of sugar cost in grams of silver in 1966, and how much does it cost today? So: 🧮 Calculating the cost of 1 kg of sugar in grams of silver in 1966: The price of sugar (SB1) in 1966 was 1.3 cents/pound or ∼0.03 per 1 kg. The price of silver (XAG) in 1966 was 1.30 per ounce. 1 ounce of silver = 31.10 grams. If 31.1 grams of silver cost 1.30, then 1 gram of silver cost 1.30/31.1 grams≈0.041 $/gram. How many grams of silver could you buy for 0.03 (the cost of 1 kg of sugar)? 0.03$/0.041$/gram≈0.7177 grams of silver. Summary: If in 1966, 1 kg of sugar cost $0.03, and silver was $1.30 per ounce, then 1 kilogram of sugar cost approximately 0.72 grams of silver . In any case, 0.72 grams of silver per kilogram of sugar is extremely low compared to historical prices of 10-20 grams of silver per kilogram. This only strengthens the argument about how drastically the price of sugar plummeted by the mid-20th century when measured in (real money) grams of silver. Let's move on; now we'll find out how many grams of silver 1 kg of sugar costs today: 🧮 Calculating the cost of 1 kg of sugar in grams of silver today: Price of silver (XAG): $33 per ounce. Price of sugar (SB1): 17.5 cents per pound or ≈0.38/kg. 1 ounce of silver = 31.10 grams. If 31.10 grams of silver cost $33, then 1 gram of silver costs: 33$/ounce/31.10 grams/ounce≈1.061 $/gram. How many grams of silver can be bought for 0.38 (the cost of 1 kg of sugar)? Cost of 1 kg of sugar in grams of silver: 0.38$/kg/1.061$/gram≈0.36 grams of silver/kg. Final Conclusion: In 1966, 1 kilogram of sugar cost approximately 0.72 grams of silver. Today, at current prices (May 2025), 1 kilogram of sugar costs approximately 0.36 grams of silver. Paradox! It turns out that even now, after the rise in sugar prices in dollars, 1 kg of sugar still costs significantly less silver (by weight) than in 1966. Okay, let's mark this important historical moment! 🔀The Sugar Price Phenomenon: Dollars VS Silver In US dollars: From 1966 (when the price was $0.03/kg) to today (approximately $0.38/kg), sugar has risen by more than +1000% or twelve times, which seems like an enormous increase. In grams of silver: But over the same period, sugar has fallen by half, from 0.72 grams of silver in 1966 to 0.36 grams of silver per 1kg of sugar today. Thus, important time points for the ⚖️silver/sugar ratio are defined: 📍 1800: ≈ 20 grams of silver per 1 kg 📍 1966: ≈ 0.72 grams of silver per 1 kg 📍 2025: ≈ 0.36 grams per 1 kg of sugar ❓ What does this mean? This contrast is a powerful argument showing that the nominal price increase in US dollars is, in essence, nothing more than the depreciation of the dollar itself ! While the real value of sugar, measured in precious metal (which has maintained its purchasing power for centuries), has actually fallen. This further reinforces the idea of how "undervalued" sugar is historically; it remains extremely cheap compared to its purchasing power in silver in 1966. Furthermore, all these examples demonstratively highlight how severely silver is undervalued today and how distorted the ⚖️silver to gold ratio is, as well as how perverted the weight-for-weight barter valuation has become—that is, the exchange of real commodity sugar for real silver weight, without the involvement of cut green paper 💵 or zeros on screens 💳. 📌Conclusion of the Second Part of the Article We can confidently state that from $\sim$1800, the cost of sugar continuously declined, reaching its bottom in 1966 at 3 cents per 1kg. Now, the 1966 minimum can be considered the starting point from which the price surged by $\sim$5000%, establishing a maximum at the end of 1974 at $1.45 per kilogram of sugar. This entire rise should be interpreted as wave (A) of a large correction to the decline from 1800. For the next 50 years, the price was confined in a sideways consolidation, which should be interpreted as a massive triangle within wave (B), whose internal structures are almost fully complete. This "sweet slumber" lasting half a century is coming to an end. In the next 10-15 years, a sharp breakout upwards from this narrowing consolidation should be expected, with targets around $5 per kilogram of sugar. The expected sharp price increase from 2025-2026, from $0.30 into the $3-10 range—that is, by +1000-3000%—will be considered wave (C) of the large correction that began in 1966. In other words, after a prolonged 150-year wave of declining sugar prices (from $\sim$1800 to 1966), a counter-trend upward movement began in 1966 as part of a correction to the decline, whose final targets are roughly forecasted around five dollars by 2040, which would collectively amount to 70-80 years of growth from the 1966 minimum, if the entire growth from 0.03 is considered within the framework of a correction to the decline from the 1800 ATH. Based on all of the above, we can move on to the forecast for the next 10-15 years. The rise in sugar prices from 1966 can be seen as the end of the "sweet life," where after the first wave of growth from 0.03 to 1.45—a 40-fold increase—a fifty-year lull followed, depicted on the chart as a narrowing triangle. Next, we should expect a sharp uncoiling of this "spring" that lasted half a century, with prices soaring from approximately $0.30 per 1kg into the range of $5 US dollars. The highlighted range of $3 to $10 above is the projected long-term target for where the price will head in the future. 📊 Geopolitical Forecast for 2025-2040 Forecasts are thankless, but the current situation leaves no doubt: sugar prices will skyrocket! So-called "climate change", rising inflation, and geopolitical bacchanalia are the perfect catalysts for a price explosion between 2025 and 2040, mirroring the dynamics observed in 1966-1974. The global sugar market is known for its volatility, and several potential triggers could cause significant price surges. Given the escalating factors of uncertainty, such as the global debt crisis, rising inflation and unemployment, the conduct of a hybrid World War III proxy war, the probable blockage of maritime trade routes, new pandemics, "climate change," and so on, the likelihood of sharp sugar price increases in the coming decades appears very high. ◻️ Possible Triggers and Causes: Climate Change and Extreme Weather Events: Droughts, floods, hurricanes, and other extreme weather events can severely damage sugarcane and sugar beet crops in key producing regions (Brazil, India, Thailand, EU). Climate change can lead to long-term shifts in weather patterns, making sugar production more unstable. Mother Nature, or whoever controls the weather, clearly decided not to be bored. Geopolitical Instability and Conflicts: Wars, regional conflicts, and political instability in producing countries or transit regions can disrupt supply chains and lead to sugar shortages in the global market. Sanctions and trade wars can limit sugar exports from key countries. When cannons speak, logistics go silent. And prices rise. Energy Crisis and Oil Prices: A sharp rise in oil prices can increase the cost of sugar production and transportation. Higher oil prices can also stimulate ethanol production from sugarcane, especially in Brazil, leading to a reduction in sugar supply for the food industry. Global Demand Growth: Continued global population growth, especially in developing countries, can increase demand for sugar. Changes in dietary habits and increased consumption of processed foods also contribute to rising demand. Supply and Logistics Problems: Pandemics or other global crises can disrupt port operations, transport networks, and supply chains, leading to delays and increased costs for sugar delivery. Government Policies and Trade Restrictions: Changes in government policy, such as the introduction of export restrictions, increased import tariffs, or the abolition of subsidies, can affect world sugar prices. Plant Diseases, Mold, and Pests: The spread of new diseases and pests resistant to existing control methods, as well as prolonged "traffic jams" at sea, can lead to significant crop losses and spoilage of goods. Market Speculation: The activity of large speculative funds can amplify price fluctuations in the sugar market, especially in conditions of uncertainty. And of course, let's not forget our "friends" the speculators, who won't miss a chance to throw fuel on this inflationary fire. ◽️ Currently, the top 10 global sugar producers are: Brazil: Traditionally the largest producer and exporter of sugar in the world. Sugar production in Brazil is closely linked to ethanol production from sugarcane. India: In recent years, India has also risen to a leading position in sugar production, even surpassing Brazil in some years. India is also a major consumer of sugar. European Union: The combined production of EU countries makes it a significant player in the global sugar market, mainly from sugar beet. China: A major producer but also a large importer of sugar due to high domestic demand. Thailand: Holds an important place among the largest global sugar exporters. USA: Sugar production in the US comes from both sugar beet and sugarcane. Pakistan: A significant sugar producer, primarily from sugarcane. Russia: The main sugar production comes from sugar beet. Mexico: An important sugar producer and exporter. Australia: A major producer and exporter of cane sugar. ◽️ Key Points: Global Production: World sugar production fluctuates around 170-190 million tons per year. Traded Market: Approximately 30-40% of total world sugar production is traded on the global market. This traded portion is almost exclusively transported by sea for international deliveries. Major Exporters: Countries like Brazil and Thailand, being leading exporters, ship the vast majority of their export volumes by sea. ◽️ Approximate Estimate: Given that approximately 30-40% of global production enters the international trade market, and the primary method for international transportation of large volumes of raw materials is sea transport, we can assume that approximately 30-40% of all produced sugar is transported by sea. 🚢 Blocking maritime trade channels can have a significant impact on sugar delivery and its price, as, as we have already discussed, a significant portion of the world's sugar is transported by sea. Here are the main consequences: Impact on Sugar Delivery: ▫️ Supply Delays: Blocking key maritime routes will lead to significant delays in sugar delivery from exporting to importing countries. This will disrupt established logistical chains. ▫️ Route Diversion: Ships will have to seek alternative, longer sea routes. This will increase transit times and, consequently, the delivery times for sugar to consumers. ▫️ Increased Transportation Costs: Longer routes mean higher fuel consumption, increased insurance premiums (especially in high-risk areas), and possible additional charges for passage through alternative channels. ▫️ Risk of Cargo Spoilage: Increased transit time can raise the risk of sugar spoilage, especially under improper storage conditions or adverse weather. ▫️ Reduced Availability: Delays and disruptions can lead to a temporary decrease in sugar availability in importing countries' markets. Impact on Sugar Price: ▫️ Price Increase: Increased transportation costs will inevitably lead to higher prices for imported sugar. These costs will be passed on to wholesalers and retailers, and ultimately to consumers. ▫️ Supply Shortage: Supply delays and reduced sugar availability can create shortages in markets, which will also contribute to price increases. Speculators may exploit the situation, further driving up prices. ▫️ Market Volatility: The blocking of trade routes will create uncertainty in the market, leading to increased volatility in sugar prices. ▫️ Regional Price Differences: Depending on which maritime channels are blocked and which countries face the most significant supply difficulties, sugar prices can vary significantly in different regions of the world. Countries heavily dependent on imports through blocked channels will suffer the most. ▫️ Impact on the Food Industry: Rising sugar prices will impact food and beverage manufacturers who use sugar as a primary ingredient. This could lead to increased prices for finished products or the search for cheaper alternatives (e.g., artificial sweeteners). ⚓️ Examples of Critical and Key Maritime Channels: Suez Canal: The most important route connecting Asia and Europe. Blockage could cause serious delays in sugar supplies from countries like India and Thailand to Europe and the Mediterranean. Remember the farce with the Ever Given in March 2021? That was just a rehearsal. Strait of Malacca: A key strait for shipping goods from the Indian Ocean to the Pacific Ocean, including sugar from Thailand and Australia to China and other East Asian countries. Panama Canal: Important for trade between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, affecting sugar supplies between North and South America. Bab-el-Mandeb Strait and the Red Sea: Recently, this region has become an area of increased instability, and blockage or threats to shipping can affect sugar supplies through this important route. Summary: The blocking (in bottlenecks) of global maritime trade channels can have serious negative consequences for sugar delivery, leading to delays, increased costs, and reduced availability, which in turn will cause a significant increase in prices in the global market. In short, the more global chaos, the sweeter life will be for sugar owners, and the more bitter for everyone else. ◻️ Scenario: Military Conflict between India and Pakistan (2025-2030) In addition to the already described factors of geopolitical instability and climate change, a full-scale or prolonged military conflict between India and Pakistan could have a significant and multifaceted impact on global sugar prices, becoming a powerful additional trigger for their rise. As if we didn't have enough other problems, right? Impact on Sugar Production: ▫️ Production Disruption in Key Regions: Both states are major producers of sugarcane. Military actions can directly disrupt agricultural work, the logistics of harvesting and transporting crops in border regions that may be important for sugarcane cultivation. ▫️ Resource Diversion: Military needs can lead to the diversion of financial and material resources from agriculture, including sugar production (e.g., fuel, labor, fertilizers). ▫️ Population Migration: Conflict can cause mass migration of populations from combat zones, leading to labor shortages on plantations and processing plants. ▫️ Infrastructure Destruction: Combat operations can damage or destroy key infrastructure related to the sugar industry, such as roads, railways, bridges, ports, and sugar factories. Impact on Trade and Logistics: ▫️ Disruption of Regional and Global Supply Chains: Given India and Pakistan's strategic location and their role in regional trade, conflict could disrupt broader logistics chains in Asia, including maritime routes used to transport sugar from other countries (e.g., Thailand) to East Asia and beyond. War is the best way to create a global shortage. ▫️ Closure or Restriction of Transport Corridors: Hostilities could lead to the closure or restriction of key land and sea transport corridors used for transporting raw materials, including sugar, resulting in delays, increased transport costs, and insurance premiums. ▫️ Increased Risks for Shipping: Military presence in regional waters could increase risks for commercial shipping, including vessels carrying sugar, leading to higher freight and insurance costs. Impact on the World Market: ▫️ Reduction in Global Supply: The combined reduction in production and disruption of exports from India and Pakistan, as major producers, will lead to a reduction in the overall global sugar supply. ▫️ Increased Speculation: Military instability in a region affecting major food producers will cause concerns in global markets and trigger speculative sugar purchases, further fueling price increases. ▫️ Increased Price Volatility: The uncertainty caused by military conflict will lead to sharp fluctuations in sugar prices on global commodity exchanges. ▫️ Regional Imbalances: Countries dependent on sugar imports from India or through regional logistics chains may face shortages and sharp price increases in their domestic markets. ◻️ Scenario: Recession, Market Collapse, and Monetary Inflation as a Factor in Rising Sugar Prices (2025-2030) – Or how economic "saviors" will gut your wallet. There are strong reasons to believe that in 2025-2026, Western economies will finally officially enter a recession, which will be accompanied by a sharp collapse in stock markets. In response, regulators (central banks such as the Fed, ECB, and Bank of England) will take decisive measures: sharply cut interest rates and launch quantitative easing (QE) programs, effectively turning on the "money printing press." Although initially, these measures aim to stabilize the financial system and stimulate the economy, they could trigger a new wave of monetary inflation between 2026 and 2030, putting additional pressure on sugar prices. And this inflation, as always, will fall on the shoulders of ordinary mortals addicted to sweets. Initial Impact of Recession and Market Collapse (2025): ▫️ Reduced Demand: Recession leads to a decrease in consumer activity and business confidence. This can temporarily reduce demand for many goods, including sugar, especially from industrial consumers (beverage manufacturers, confectioners, etc.). ▫️ Temporary Dollar Strengthening: In conditions of global uncertainty, the US dollar often acts as a "safe-haven currency," which can temporarily make dollar-denominated commodities relatively more expensive for buyers with other currencies. Impact of Monetary Policy (2026-2030): ▫️ Depreciation of Paper Money: Sharp cuts in interest rates and massive money emission (QE) lead to the weakening of currencies against other assets, including real assets such as raw materials. This makes sugar, traded on international markets, more expensive when converted into these currencies. ▫️ Rising Inflationary Expectations: An increase in the money supply in circulation and low interest rates can create inflationary expectations among businesses and consumers. This can lead sugar producers and sellers to factor higher inflationary risks into their prices. ▫️ Increased Production Costs: Monetary inflation leads to rising prices for energy, fertilizers, transport, and labor — key components of the cost of producing sugarcane and sugar beet. This cost pressure will be passed on to the final price of sugar. 🔁 Interaction with Other Factors: The presented scenarios of geopolitical instability, climate change, and potential military conflict between India and Pakistan will not develop in isolation from the macroeconomic situation. A recession in Western economies and subsequent monetary stimulus can significantly amplify or alter sugar price dynamics: Increased Inflationary Pressure: Monetary inflation caused by regulatory actions can multiply the price pressure already present due to supply problems caused by climate anomalies or geopolitical conflicts. Reduced supply amid depreciating currencies will lead to an even sharper rise in imported sugar prices. Limited Investment in Production: Recession can lead to reduced investment in expanding and modernizing the sugar industry due to decreased business activity and uncertain economic prospects. This can limit the market's ability to respond to growing demand or supply disruptions, exacerbating shortages and pushing prices up. Impact on Purchasing Power: Recession and rising unemployment reduce the purchasing power of the population. Amid rising sugar prices, this could lead to reduced consumption, but also trigger social discontent and pressure on governments to regulate prices, which could create additional market imbalances. Speculative Capital: Loose monetary policy with low interest rates can direct speculative capital into commodity markets, including the sugar market, in search of higher returns or protection against inflation. This can lead to artificial price inflation unrelated to fundamental supply and demand factors. Energy Crisis and Monetary Inflation: If an energy crisis coincides with a period of monetary inflation, the cost of producing and transporting sugar will rise even more sharply, putting additional pressure on final prices. Higher oil prices, stimulating ethanol production, could further reduce sugar supply for the food industry during inflation. Interaction with Trade Route Blockades: In conditions of monetary inflation, the blocking of key maritime trade routes will lead to an even more significant rise in sugar prices due to increased shipping costs and limited supply. Countries dependent on imports will face sharp price increases in their national currency due to the weakening of that currency against the dollar (the commodity trading currency). 📝 Basic Scenario: Sugar Price Surge (2025-2040) - An Echo of 1966-1974 This scenario posits a period of escalating global instability and environmental pressure that disrupts sugar production and trade, leading to sustained price increases, similar in trajectory (though not necessarily in magnitude) to the 1966-1974 period. ◽️ Phase 1: Escalation of Global Instability and Production Concerns (2025-2030) Geopolitical Tensions and Conflicts: Persistent regional conflicts intensify, and new hotspots of instability emerge, including potential escalation of tensions in key producing regions and transit zones. The risk of military conflict between India and Pakistan poses an additional threat to regional production and logistics. Increased Impact of "Climate Change": Extreme weather events (droughts, floods, hurricanes) become more frequent and intense in major sugarcane and sugar beet growing regions (Brazil, India, Thailand, EU), leading to reduced yields and crop losses. Energy Crisis and Oil Prices: Volatility and potential increases in energy prices raise the cost of agricultural production, harvesting, and sugar transportation. High oil prices incentivize ethanol production from sugarcane, reducing sugar supply for the food industry. Supply and Logistics Problems: Persistent consequences of pandemics and geopolitical tensions can lead to disruptions in port operations, transport networks, and increased shipping costs. The risk of blockades of key maritime trade routes (Suez, Malacca, Panama, Bab-el-Mandeb Straits) increases, causing delays, ship rerouting, and a sharp increase in transport expenses. Recession in Western Economies (beginning of the period): A decline in consumer demand amid a recession may initially exert a dampening effect on prices, but this will be a temporary factor. But don't be fooled, this will only be a brief respite before the real circus begins. ◽️ Phase 2: Supply Shortages and Accelerating Price Growth (2030-2035) Continued Production Problems: Several consecutive years of adverse weather conditions and potential military conflicts lead to a sustained decline in global sugar production and depletion of stocks. Trade and Logistics Disruptions: Blockades of maritime routes and regional instability create significant obstacles for international sugar trade, leading to shortages in importing countries. Growing Global Demand: Continued population growth and economic development in developing countries increase global demand for sugar. Monetary Inflation: Central banks' actions to stimulate the economy after the recession (interest rate cuts, QE) begin to manifest as monetary inflation, weakening currencies and increasing the cost of raw materials. Speculative Buying: Concerns about supply shortages and inflationary expectations stimulate speculative buying in commodity markets, amplifying price growth. ◽️ Phase 3: Peak Prices and Substitution Potential (2035-2040) Sugar Becomes (Relatively) a Luxury: Persistently high prices make sugar a significant expense item for the food industry and consumers. Increased Use of Alternatives: The high cost of sugar stimulates broader use of artificial and natural sweeteners, as well as changes in food and beverage recipes. Your body will "welcome" new chemical experiments instead of familiar sweetness. Government Intervention : Governments of importing countries may attempt to regulate prices or introduce subsidies to mitigate the effects of high food inflation. Impact of Military Conflict: A prolonged or expanding military conflict between India and Pakistan could lead to a catastrophic reduction in supply from this region and a further explosive price increase. 📌 Final Forecast: The presented scenario paints a picture of a potential significant increase in sugar prices between 2025 and 2040, by 10-20 times. The combination of escalating geopolitical instability, the intensifying impact of climate change, potential military conflict in a key region, and loose monetary policy after a recession creates conditions for a significant and sustained rise in sugar prices during the 2025-2040 period. While the exact scale of the increase is difficult to predict, a repetition of the price dynamics observed in 1966-1974 (a multiple increase in value) seems quite likely. Global debt is a ticking time bomb, inflation is the cancer of the economy, wars are man-made chaos, and route blockades are a chokehold on global trade. And all this will merge into a perfect storm for sugar prices! 📊 Conclusion: "The Sweet Life" Has Ended This article, created by me (with the help of artificial intelligence), and the analysis of historical sugar price dynamics — from its exotic status to a mass-consumed commodity — and the consideration of potential triggers in the current unstable global environment, suggest that the multi-year era of relatively low sugar prices is coming to an end. The analogy with the 70s is not just a historical reference; it's a clear scenario of what's to come. The sugar market is preparing for a repeat of that explosive growth, and you will either ride the wave or be buried beneath it. The combination of intensifying geopolitical tensions, the destabilizing impact of climate weapons climate change on global agriculture, the vulnerability of global logistics chains, rising global demand, and potential monetary inflation creates a perfect storm capable of provoking a significant and sustained increase in the price of this key commodity in the next 10-15 years. The projected ten to twenty-fold increase in prices by 2040 does not seem excessive, given the historical volatility of the sugar market and the potential strength of the interaction of the factors mentioned above. The blocking of critically important maritime trade routes could be the catalyst that pushes prices to a fundamentally new level, highlighting the vulnerability of global commodity trade. Summarizing all discussed aspects, we can confidently state that the "sweet life", in terms of low prices for this "white powder" is over in the foreseeable future. It's time to reconsider our perception of the value of this everyday, yet strategically important commodity, and be ready for potentially significant changes in its pricing in the coming decades. 🙏 Thank you for your attention and 🚀 for the idea. ☘️ Good luck, take care! 📟 Stay in touch.
ICEUS:SB1!Long
by T_A_R_A_S
Bitcoin: LEVELS LOOKOUT!If you find this information inspiring/helpful, please consider a boost and follow! Any questions or comments, please leave a comment! BTC on Watch: Short-Term Levels That May Show the Market’s Hand #Bitcoin is hovering around all-time highs, but traders should be on high alert. There’s a visible level just beneath price that’s acting as the current line in the sand. What to Look At Rather than overanalyze, just focus on the chart. A clean level around $100k is marked — if that gives way, it may not just be a smaller degree pullback on news. It could be the start of something more revealing and deeper. What Comes Next? If price breaks that 107k zone, watch what the market prints in response. Does it flush impulsively? Does it grind? Those reactions will show intent — and possibly confirm or deny a larger corrective wave unfolding. Outlook We’re not guessing the future — we’re waiting to observe the market’s decision point. Eyes on that level. If it breaks, the chart will speak louder than words. Trade Safe! Trade Clarity!
COINBASE:BTCUSDShort
by CryptoKnee
DG Developing Impulse [LONG]1. The Big Picture: Wave Structure Down-trend Completion A five-wave decline (labelled “5” at the bottom, ≈ $69.56) finishes in early March 2025. Complex Correction (W-X-Y) From December 2024 into March 2025 the market chops out a W-X-Y sideways correction between roughly $70–83. New Uptrend (Impulse) Wave 1 up to $84.53 Wave 2 pullback into the 0.5–0.707 zone ($77.05 | 75.28 | 73.95) Wave 3 powerful thrust into the high-90s Wave 4 shallow retrace into the mid-$80s Wave 5 of 3 (current leg) pushing into the low-$100s 2. Current Position: Subwave 5 of Wave 3 Price now: $101.39 We appear to be in the 5th subwave of the larger Wave 3. That means one more small thrust higher is likely before Wave 3 completes. 3. Target Zone for Wave 3 The 1.618 × Wave 1→3 extension sits at 104.18. The grey box (~$103–$106) marks our Wave 3 target. Traders often look to take partial profits as price enters this zone. 4. Key Support / Invalidation Levels Short-term bump: 23.6% of Wave 4→5, at ≈ $100.00 Primary support: old Wave 4 high / 38.2% retracement, at ≈ $97.50 Invalidation: a clear break below $97.50 would argue that the Wave 5 advance is failing (and could reopen a deeper correction). 5. What Happens After Wave 3? Once Wave 3 tops out (~104–106), expect a Wave 4 correction of that entire impulse. Typical Wave 4 depth is 38.2% of Wave 3: that would put a pullback into roughly $90–92. After Wave 4 completes, a final Wave 5 higher would target new all-time highs. 6. Trading Plan Ideas Long exposure: add on small dips down to $100–$100.50, keep stops under $97.50. Partial profit: begin scaling out as price enters $103–$106. Watch for reversal signals (e.g. bearish divergence, high-volume down days) once inside the grey box—this will mark the end of the impulsive Wave 3. Bottom line: DG is in the late stages of a textbook Elliott-Wave 3, with one last run higher into the $104–$106 zone likely, then a healthy multi-week pullback (Wave 4) should follow. Keep your stops under $97.50 and look to lock in profits as you approach that extension target.
NYSE:DGLong
by cowboycharts