Barrick Gold $GOLD | On The RadarToday on the radar, Barrick Gold
Barrick Gold has attracted some attention as major investors, including recently the notable Stanley Druckenmiller, have taken significant positions. With these influential players entering the fray, while the gold market experiencing remarkable momentum, the question emerges: Is this the right moment to buy? Well, let's dive on it and look at some fundemantals, some metrics and some technicals.
The fundemantals
Gold has exhibited remarkable resilience, maintaining stability despite the backdrop of high interest rates. It has remained relatively stable around the $2000 level for some time now and recently experienced a notable surge in momentum. Meanwhile, the mining sector has faced challenges and has been trading at discounted levels. This disparity may suggest a lag in market perception, particularly regarding the potential for a flight to safety and subsequently, a shift towards safety asset producers.
The world economy is hitting a rough patch, with recessions popping up globally. While the U.S. is trying for a soft landing and celebrating record-high stock markets, there are some conflicting signs from key economic indicators. This divergence might resolve soon, depending on how things pan out in the real economy, possibly prompting a move towards safer assets. Add the fact that central banks globally are bullish on gold, and the BRICS nations are also showing a keen interest, aligning with the broader trend of moving away from the dollar.
So, with gold demand on the upswing, and considering the mining sector's relative underperformance compared to the gold price, there seems to be a noteworthy opportunity for those looking to go long on both gold and the mining industry.
The metrics
Now, let's explore some metrics to determine if this company is fairly valued, discounted, or possibly overpriced. Right from the start, Barrick Gold stands out among mining companies for its exceptionally clean balance sheet. They have great cashflow, manage their debt and liabilities quite well, which could be one of the reasons drawing significant interest from big and famous investors. Notably, the company consistently beats expectations.
Price/Earnings Ratios:
Trailing P/E: 22.04
Forward P/E: 18.05
The forward P/E is lower than the trailing P/E, indicating that the market expects future earnings growth. The P/E ratios suggest a moderate valuation compared to the company's earnings.
Price/Sales and Price/Book Ratios:
Price/Sales: 2.44
Price/Book: 1.19
Both ratios suggest relatively low valuation compared to sales and book value. However, the interpretation should consider industry benchmarks and historical values.
Profitability Margins:
Profit Margin: 11.16%
Operating Margin: 13.08%
The company has healthy profit margins, indicating efficient operations.
Liquidity and Solvency:
Current Ratio: 3.16
Total Debt/Equity: 16.32%
The company has a strong current ratio, suggesting good short-term liquidity. The debt/equity ratio is moderate, indicating a balanced capital structure.
Growth and Financial Performance:
Revenue Growth (yoy): 10.30%
Quarterly Earnings Growth: Not available
Positive revenue growth is a good sign, but it's important to consider the earnings growth trend.
Cash Flow:
Operating Cash Flow: $3.73 billion
Levered Free Cash Flow: $675.75 million
The company generates healthy operating and free cash flows.
In summary, the stock seems to have reasonable valuation metrics, strong profitability margins, positive revenue growth, and healthy liquidity. Compared to some peers, Barrick Gold appears to trade at a slight discount.
Over the past year, there have been noteworthy insider transactions involving both selling and buying activities. However, it is particularly noteworthy that the board of directors has recently engaged in a substantial buying spree. This prompts the question: What insights are they uncovering?
The Technicals
Now, let's delve into some technical analysis—the very reason we're all here and appreciate TradingView. Firstly, we're entering a week filled with significant economic data releases. Additionally, the gold market has experienced a prolonged uptrend. This is certainly a factor to keep in mind in the upcoming days/week, as increased volatility and potential corrections may manifest. Bearing this in consideration, let's explore how we can reflect these dynamics on the chart.
Examining the daily chart over the past 1.5 years and scrutinizing the price structure, a distinct pattern emerges. Following a decline from $25, the price has exhibited a wide-ranging behavior. Notably, it consistently rebounds from the $14 range, suggesting a possible floor or bottom. Taking a more extensive view, this aligns with a monthly/yearly support level. The overarching support, coupled with daily resistance, hints at a potential continuation of ranging price action, possibly leading to a convergence or apex point. In such a scenario, there could be multiple buying opportunities in the coming months, facilitating the accumulation of a robust long position—unless a market shift and strong momentum occur.
Examining the daily chart closely reveals a well-defined descending channel without a distinct apex for reference. Despite the recent breach of prior lows, it's crucial to interpret this cautiously, as breaking one low doesn't automatically signal immediate concerns, especially when the price remains above the monthly low. It could be indicative of a failed breakout. In the event of a market correction this week, these price levels might actually serve as a reliable range for initiating long positions, with a carefully placed tight stop around the $13 range.
A tool I find particularly useful is the fixed volume profile, which proves valuable in identifying specific price ranges characterized by high volume. This method unveils potential breakout zones, support and resistance levels, and even target zones. I typically overlay these profiles onto specific structures, such as from top to top or bottom to top, to gain a more insightful perspective on volume distribution within the structure. A noteworthy observation is the concentration of the highest volume around the $16.50 range. In my approach, a breach of this level, followed by a potential bounce and continuation, could provide valuable insights into the prevailing momentum.
A correlation exists with the recent Point of Control (POC) and some previous lows in this range, making it a potential local bounce zone worth monitoring. Beyond this point, significant price zones to consider include the $17.50 range and the $19 range. The latter could serve as a conservative initial target, and subsequent analysis of the broader circumstances will help determine if the price can break away, potentially sparking a major rally. If we manage to capitalize on a correction and enter at a lower current price, achieving a buy-in below the $15 range, could yield a 25% return on investment (ROI) or potentially even more, depending on market conditions.
Observing the regular volume, there's a noticeable dip that occurred last year, particularly during the summertime. While this dip isn't particularly surprising or highly meaningful, what stands out is the consistent increase in the daily average volume.
Another indicator I find valuable is the Hull, essentially an alternative moving average. It's currently on the verge of crossing and transitioning to green on the daily chart. While this doesn't carry significant weight on its own, it can certainly contribute to the decision-making process. Even if the crossing occurs and the indicator turns green, the price may still experience a pullback. The intriguing aspect will be observing the depth of the correction and whether the price manages to sustain the indicators in the green zone. Ideally, a bounce on the indicator could signal a retention of upside momentum.
It's crucial to note that technical analysis involves a significant degree of subjectivity. The paths indicated on the chart with the blue dotted lines are not predictions; instead, they represent favorable scenarios to monitor. The outcome will hinge on various scenarios and how they unfold. Despite the inherent subjectivity, the fundamentals are sound, the metrics and ratios look promising and momentum seems to be evolving.
And as always, please remember that this analysis is for informational and recreational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Draw your own conclusions based on your assessment.
Metric
How to: Dynamic DCA with Risk Metric [Live Backtest]Hi Everyone,
This tutorial is a live backtest demonstration of a basic Dynamic DCA strategy using my Bitcoin Risk Metric and how it performed in the 2018-2021 BTC market cycle.
The risk metric quantifies the risk of buying BTC at any given time, highlighting periods of overvaluation and undervaluation. A Dynamic DCA strategy allows the user to:
Accumulate BTC during periods of undervaluation.
Lock in profit during periods of overvaluation.
Grow a cash position (undeployed capital) to take advantage of periods of extreme undervaluation.
I hope this tutorial is informative and gives a clear picture of how the @panpanXBT Bitcoin Risk Metric indicators can be utilised to guide decision making.
Please refer to the ideas linked below for information on how to gain access to these private indicators and strategies.
Bitcoin price of $330,000 by end of 2025 scenario 2Using the BLX chart on the 2 days to show Bitcoin as a scenario 2 possibility for Bitcoin reaching this $330k value by April instead of the end of year 2025. there are certain parameters used to make this assertion. On the first bear market of 2014 from the bottom to the next higher low was about 220 days and then the bull started for the next cycle. The next was in the 2018 Bear where we had the first low at $3200 and then the next higher low at $3900 which represents about 454 days before the next bull cycle kicked in where Bitcoin hit a high of $69k in 2021. If we take this double increase difference and add it to this next cycle we will see a possible 800 days from the first low to the next higher low and we get our possible April date for the Bitcoin peak in 2025. I am using a fractal plus the Beambands as an indicator for this possible target price which coincides at top of beamband in 2025.
Posting an updated chart of my Wyckoff Accumulation ideaWe've probably reached the bottom on the 17'600 wick or have come very close to it. My proprietary risk metric allows for a minimum daily close of 16'400$, which we will potentially reach on a spring event in case this wyckoff accumulation plays out.
Previously:
DXY $119 target for short term Could we see the DXY target this curve metric all the way to $119? I am using a fractal as a visual for this possibility. This target has great resistance back in 2001 and 2002 as the DXY peaked several times. Interesting to see if we will respect this curved arch all the way through. This arch is parabolic till October 2022 if it respects the metrics.
Educational materials nr. 4Hello, dear community.
This article is about metrics, which show real finance situation of the company. They are based on Cash Flow Statement. Metrics, based on Income Statement can be unreal, but based on Cash Flow Statement are hard to forge.
Describing of them:
CFI – Cash Flow from Investing. Calculate with buying-selling securities, emission of bonds and dividend payments.
CFF – Cash Flow from Financing. Calculate with buying-selling of company assets.
CFO – Cash Flow from Operations. Is the most important in analyzing of financial situation. Calculate with sells, inventory costs, interest payments, taxes and cost of goods sold (COGS).
FCF – Free Cash Flow. Is sum of CFI, CFF, CFO.
P/FCF – relation price of the stock to FCF on stock. Is metric of overvaluation/undervaluation of the company. Is important near, close meanings of P/E to P/FCF. That is mean, that real activity of company has no difference or little difference from declared results.
Price-to-Owner-Earnings – Relation price of the stock to owner earning on stock. Show real activity of the company, unlike P/E.
Owner earnings – Profit of the owners of the company. Owner earnings = net profit + depreciation & amortization +/- another non-cash costs – average annual maintenance capital expenses.
But even Cash Flow statement do not secure from manipulations. For understanding real situation needs:
1. Exclude tax benefits related to employee stock options.
2. Exclude anomaly big changes in currents assets. For example, it is big changing of accounts receivables, inventories, accounts payable. All this changes tell, that company try to manipulate data to make better presentation of financial results.
3. Minus costs, which needs to support operational activity (taken from CFI).
Pros metrics, based on Cash Flow Statement:
+ Show real situation of the company business
+ Hard to forge – any changes are seen
Cons metrics, based on Cash Flow Statement:
- Needs checking and re-calculations
This indexes give a possibility to check veracity of financial results. And they complement analysis from Income Statement and Balance Sheet metrics.
Wish you have good investments,
Financial advisor and analyst,
Valerii Selin
Educational materials nr. 3Hello everyone, who are interested in value investing.
This article is about metrics, based on Income Statement data. They are used for first-look analysis to understanding is this company good for investing. This metrics show over/undervaluation of company. Undervalued companies are good to investing.
Description of indicators:
PE – relation of stock price to net profit on stock. Indicate over/undervaluation of the company. Her critical meaning depends from sector of economic, in which works company.
PE without NRI – relation of stock price to net profit on stock, but do not include unusual profits from non-operational activity (selling part of assets, real estate and so on). If PE without NRI is equal PE – company have profits only from operational activity and is good signal.
Forward PE – consolidated meaning future PE from analytics.
PB – relation price of stock to the book value of stock. Measure of over/undervaluation of the company. If PB = 1, it is mean, that company have fair value. Usually PB is more than 1 and become 1 or lower only in crisis.
PS – relation price of stock to sales/revenue.
EV-to-EBIT, EV-to-EBITDA, EV-to-Revenue – another variant of metrics under/overvaluation of the company. Can be used instead PE or with PE.
Revenue – Or sales.
EBITDA – Income after paying COGS (Cost of goods saled), SG&A (selling, general and administrative expences) and before payment of D&A (depreciation and amortization), taxes and interest rates.
EBIT = net profit – EBITDA after payment D&A, taxes and interest rates.
Enterprise value (EV) – price of company at absorption by other company. EV = Market Capitalization + Debt + Preferred Shares – Total Cash
Market capitalization = shares at market*price of share
PEG – relation price of stock to earnings growth on share for 5 years. Indicates market waiting. If PEG > 1, it is mean, that company is overvalued by market and/or analysts. If PEG<1, that mean, that company is undervalued by market and/or analysts. Uses as auxiliary metric.
Pros of this metrics:
+ They give “photography” of company on the stock market
+ Give a possibility to make comparative analysis with other companies.
Cons of this metrics:
- Don’t give a valuation of financial health of the company
- Don’t give a valuation of structure of the company
This negative sites decides by using other metrics.
Indicators, based on the Income Statement, are important part of analysis of the company and give understanding of her status at analysis moment and needs of next analysis. But using this metrics needs to use that with other elements of quality and quantitative analysis.
Wish You have good investing,
Financial analyst and advisor,
Valerii Selin
Educational materials nr.2 Hello dear community, wish you have good day.
As it was in educational materials number 1, for analysis of company actively use metrics. They include calculation financial data from financial statement. This calculation uses to compare with other companies in sector and to compare with history of company. Metrics are part of complex analysis. Sources of metrics can be taken from Morning Star, GuruFocus and other.
Bad meanings of metrics do not mean, that company is bad. On metrics have influence external factors and all financial data are based on a last published statement. That is why this indexes are analyzed with financial statements of the company. For example, big debts can be general characteristic of sector.
We can make classification metrics as:
1) Based on income statement. Used to understanding overvalue/undervalue of company at moment.
2) Based on Cash Flow statement. Indicator of financial health of the firm.
3) Based on Balance sheet. Useful when you need to understand structure of the equity, assets and debts – indicate money-management of the company.
Exist many other metrics, but they are used in special methods of analysis of company.
Pros:
1. Easy to use and interpretation;
2. Some objectivity in analyzing of company;
3. Easy-to-understand calculations;
Cons:
1. Exist risk of manipulation of financial data in financial statement. Some guarantee exist, when company have an audit;
2. Need to check financial statement;
3. Do not give all-include analysis, needs research of environment and sector of the company;
Metrics are good in analysis of the company: easy-to-use, objective, possibility to understand situation on market and comparing with competitors. But they must be complete with qualitative analysis. This is comparing with competitors, analysis of market and research of financial statement.
Wish You have big profits and good investment,
Financial analyst and advisor - Valerii Selin