Inflation Wins, We LoseThere are two kinds of inflation, the normal one and the dangerous one.
Printing money creates inflation. The kind however which is not dangerous to the foundation of the economy.
With money printing, currency loses value and prices react accordingly. Nobody gets wealthy from money printing, and in a sense, "nobody" gets poor. By nobody I mean the economy as an average doesn't really get hurt. Inflation however widens the gap between poor and wealthy.
Poor get poorer while rich get richer...
Inflation analysis can be very simple. If one believes in simple support/resistance levels from consolidation patterns, then the following picture can be drawn for the standard inflation chart.
For further validation, we can try analyzing commodities like oil. In the main chart, crude oil value is divided by the "total value of money in circulation". The value of money is the yield percentage.
A massive consolidation pattern formed in 1986-2002, on which we are now supported. I believe that price cannot drop much lower than the point we are in. Dips can be expected, but in macro scale the chart is bullish.
From the chart above, we conclude that oil prices (inflation) will grow compared to yields themselves. Each increase in yields (inflation fighting) will lead to higher oil prices (higher inflation). Charts like these prove the Catch-22 phenomenon we are in.
This is the bad kind of inflation. This inflation is un-fixable.
There is a plethora of charts that prove what I say, that inflation is unfixable. One of these charts is GOLD*PPIACO.
@SPY_Master used the GOLD*DBC chart as a measure of inflation. Gold*PPIACO can be considered as another very-long-term inflation measure.
Commodity production cost is bull-flagging against money supply itself.
So okay, we all expect more inflation. And surely, equity prices have priced this in, right?
Wrong.
Equities have priced-in that the FED is controlling inflation. Investors expect both inflation and the FED to calm soon. So, equities have priced-in something that will never come. An investment can suffer when the investor judges the situation wrong. An investor who has understood the situation, "cannot" go bankrupt.
Equity prices show that markets ignore the FED.
In the chart above, DJI is divided by the yield curve as an attempt to measure the ability of equities to grow in a progressively tighter economy (falling yield-curve, negative yield curve). Even with all that money destruction and yield increases, equities are making all-time highs. The markets are very stubborn.
The yield curve may describe the "ease" the market shows for equities. In normal times, the yield curve is positive, long-term yields are higher than short-term ones. This encourages short-term borrowing and stimulates the economy. As the yield curve steadily lowers, short-term money borrowing is less and less interesting for investors.
(In the Spaaace!!! idea linked below, you can find more information about the DJI/yield-curve chart)
High inflation and stubborn markets by themselves don't render equities as worthless. After all, equities survived in the stagflation period of 1970s. While the stagflation outcome can play out, there are things that may happen before it. There are some charts which are very concerning for equities...
We tend to talk about the crypto bubble, and ignore the equity one.
Equities have been consistently growing for the last 15 years. But thanks to what? Are companies in a "better shape" than they were in 2010? Sure technology has evolved, but from dependable devices we are now filled with unstable gadgets. Consumer devices as well as corporate ones, are more vulnerable than ever before. Security gaps are now appearing from big-tech companies to banks. Sure, issues like these were commonly occurring throughout history.
But let's consider, is the immense equity growth representative of the dependence we can have on companies and their products/services?
Are equities growing because of actual innovation, or from the easy way of derivatives?
This chart shows the diminishing nature of derivatives. They are exponentially losing value, but their effect is much bigger than their cost. A purchase of cheap derivatives can bubble-up anything you can hope for.
Where does this chart lead us?
This chart attempts to calculate the effect of derivatives in QQQ price. Before 2020, QQQ consisted of a "stable" amount of derivatives. Price moved in the channel. In 2021 a bull-flag formed and launched the chart in incredible new highs (where we are now). It is one way to visualize the immense effect of derivatives, especially in big-tech stocks.
(More about this chart in the "who would you trust with your money" idea linked below)
Even if Bitcoin is "overpriced", it will be the winner if this golden bull-flag breaks out. Bitcoin seems to be beating many investments. Even if it may not be considered a commodity, it certainly behaves like one. Even if equities grow, each upwards move for equities, will lead to much higher prices for Bitcoin.
Just like Bitcoin is bull-flagging against the most powerful of equity bubbles (QQQ Derivatives), commodities are bull-flagging against the most stable of equities (DJI)
Not all equities are grim though... We may be witnessing a massive wealth transfer away from US corporations. In this idea, I attempt to analyze the massive shift of balance that we may be witnessing.
While much harm has come to Europe from the war, almost everything is priced in. If the chart is correct, it means that every upwards move for US equities will push Germany further upwards.
Germany has been enjoying a massive influx of money from the entire EU. After swallowing the entire European market, it is now forming a bull-flag against Europe and other countries.
Germany as well as emerging markets prove a significant challenge for the US. These are bad news indeed for US equities...
Tread lightly, for this is hallowed ground.
-Father Grigori
NDQ
You against inflationMoney printing has been a double-edged sword. One one hand ample liquidity helped the exponential productivity of the economy, on the other hand inflation hit hard.
In periods of stagflation like the 1970s, immense inflation created an impenetrable ceiling for equities.
In periods of extreme deflation (2010s), equities bubbled. It is interesting that in this period, inflation figures were are all-time lows, with immense money printing.
With this chart we attempt to measure when and how much equities managed to overperform the weight of inflation.
There are two methods of calculating inflation, one is total money printed, and the other is the "cumulative inflation".
If we analyze SPX compared to money printed, this would be the outcome:
This is not very helpful, since SPX is too closely related to total money printed.
To measure "cumulative inflation" I attempted modifying this chart by @SPY_Master
DBC*GOLD is a good estimate of inflation. Since we don't have enough historical data for the DBC index, we analyze one of it's cousins, the PPIACO index. DBC is an energy-focused mutual fund, while PPIACO measures the production cost. We assume that PPIACO*GOLD is a suitable replacement for DBC*GOLD.
We end up with the cover chart, which I will briefly analyze, since it speaks on it's own.
For almost 10 years we were attempting at penetrating the ribbon, to no avail...
These fib-retracements are very beautiful...
SPX:
NDQ:
They all prove that there is massive weight on top of us.
After almost 10 years of trying to get back inside the high-energy-level above, can we do it now?
Tread lightly, for this is hallowed ground.
-Father Grigori
Arbitrary LinesBabylon, the city where everybody spoke different languages.
In the end, Babylon met grave consequences.
(Macro perspective of the main chart)
Citizens of Babylon, in our case traders, can barely communicate.
They all speak in different timeframes, and with contradicting interests.
Which translator in their right mind can untangle spaghetti?
Many different lengths of regression.
How can any translator give a geographic position of anything?
Even if I try to make an argument...
... I am plotting arbitrary lines.
(bearish trendlines)
A line is nothing but weak. It can easily "disprove" what I have "proved".
(bullish trendline)
If we are to leap ahead, we must throw away all of which we are sure to be correct.
Surely there is something we can agree upon, right?
For I was conscious that I knew practically nothing...
-Plato
It seems that everything is based around the chaos theory.
The flight of a butterfly can affect tornadoes.
Traders (like me) fall in the trap of making chaos into facts and arguments, and conclude into definitive answers.
Clean and ordered answers taken out of chaos.
Ordo Ab Chao
Is anything/everything that we do a desperate attempt to revert entropy/chaos? Like an insane ritual?
Maybe we know nothing. Maybe making arguments and conclusions is meaningless.
Tread lightly, for this is hallowed ground.
-Father Grigori
NDQ, NDX, Nasdaq, Us100 setupIf price should trade above my Take profit 15209.56 - 15210.69 before 9:30am NY time on the 6th of Nov 2023, then I favor a market reversal to take profit below. But if market doesn't do that, I look for a direction which I believe the market should be going. Idea will be updated frequently.
This is a daily chart
Russel 2000 vs Nasdaq, important momentThis is essentially a momentum play where we're seeking a breakout in the Russell 2000 (RUT) compared to the Nasdaq, signifying relative overperformance and potentially paving the way for new highs on the S&P 500 (SPX).
It's important to note that a rejection at this juncture would indicate a bearish signal. However, from a pattern probability perspective, the outlook appears bullish. Even though we're currently at all-time high (ATH) levels, this aligns with historical trends from the year 2000, and the prevailing inflationary period suggests the possibility of reaching even higher highs in the future, unless we breakout on the yield curve inversion and have the bear steepener event (see my other charts) that could very well align with the resistance we have here and failing a monthly breakout we can experience a bull trap. Only a monthly close above is a strong buy signal.
NDQ | Hidden in plain sight...This is a period of recession, a period when hands change. Last becomes first and first becomes last.
Curiously, if you mix and match the main indices, you will get bored of the same shape appearing over and over again.
They all appear in the same period. This stuff is hidden in plain sight...
NDQ vs DJI
SPX vs NYA
NDQ vs RUI
RUI vs NYA
RUA vs DJI
This one is full of small HnS. A little rough but okay.
And an extra speculation:
DJI vs SPX
Question: Where do all these HnS lead to? Who is the final recipient? Since all these charts are comparative to one another.
Tread lightly, for this is hallowed ground.
-Father Grigori
NASDAQ Heading Lower For Longer (1D)NASDAQ Daily
Price Chart
We have quite a bit going on here so, pitter patter lets get at 'er. First, we have our second fake out (Highlighted) on the major trend line (Yellow Solid) which is accompanied by less buying volume than the first. EMA's have not crossed yet however we have a solid close below the 50-day and a legit cross of the 12-day and 26-day indicating a change in direction. We're getting the bounce we thought we might (Teal Dotted), which was outlined in the Weekly analysis that will be linked below, and should max out at the top teal dotted line if it pushes past the EMAs; This will be dependent on Nvidia earnings since it's so heavily weighted on the Index. After it begins to come down the first target of support (Green Box) aligns with the 200-day EMA, so that's definitely in play and will most likely see a decent bounce from there.
Relative Strength Indicator
Most notable here is the bearish divergence (Aqua Solid) that played out in the previous months and lead to a break in the major trend line. This lead to a small retest and the beginning of a bounce on the line of support (Teal Dotted). From here we likely see a retest of the 50 level to accompany the bounce and a rejection to downside to confirm our analysis.
On Balance Volume
Similarly to the RSI there was also bearish divergence that played out from previous months that lead to change in the direction of the OBV. The major level of support, or midpoint of the double top, was broken and confirmed the change in direction; This lead to the major trend line on this indicator also snapping. Most recently we've seen the beginning of a bounce on a line of support, which will most likely lead to a retest of the major trend line before resuming it's downward movement. Our target here aligns with another major trend line (Faded Yellow Solid) and the target support (Green Box).
TLDR;
Bro u pittur pattured moar thn u gat @ hur. Yea, well, we're in the business of pittering and the pattering is good. Price action is showing weakness and we're beginning get a small bounce at the second fake out break out of the major trend line; NVDA earnings will determine the height of it. The 12-day / 26-day EMA's actually crossed this time and there's been a solid close below the 50-day. RSI and OBV both show bearish divergences that have played out and confirmed the change in direction; both indicators are also showing a bounce at outlined supports before downward momentum resumes. Current targets are the green boxes.
What Seems Legit?
We bounce from excitement into Nvidia earnings; This seems to big one of the largest earnings calls in awhile, so you know big brain bets have already been placed, no one is showing up fashionably late for this. Earnings come out and the market either goes nuts, or has lackluster performance (our guess) into Friday where our overlords seal the deal for lower price movement.
Chart Key
Yellow Solid = Major Trend Line
Red Solid = Major Support
Aqua Solid = Divergences
Teal Dotted = Support / Bounce Area
Red Box = Major Resistance
Green Boxes = Supports / Target Areas
Long LILM No clue what these people do. had a great long off the lows. got my hand burnt shorting, but positive profit so far. Buying here, small size, no stop. Not advise