Economic logWith the New Year here with the Fed fighting aggressively to battle inflation i know there are a lot of rumors floating around the FED either lowering, maintaining, or increasing the FFR (federal funds rate). none of this matters in my opinion.
why?
price goes up and buyers slow down.
Because, the FED jacked up interest rates so fast that they did not allow the markets to adjust. it seems as is the fed noticed that the inflation was indeed not "Transitory". anyone who believed the idea of transitory inflation is honestly quite foolish. something as absurd as "transitory inflation" is lip service for "give us a second to decide what to do". And "do" they did. As traders we do not care whether its political, all we care about is "the Set-up" there are a few fundamentals that lead me to believe this could potentially be a solid set-up.
1. during 2020 the FED lowered interest rates and here in the states there was a huge surge in demand for housing. So, homeowners bought houses at super low interest rates around the 3's. prior homeowners refinanced their homes at lower interest rates. Around the same percentage. Commercial Real Estate Investors bought RE during this time thinking the good times were going to continue to roll and when the bridge money is complete the inexperienced RE investors probably did not account for the massively higher interest rates on their Exit Caps when they ran their due diligence. So whats going to happen is now that the FED has made money way more expensive it has locked these investors and the sorry souls that invested with the guys in with the property. they will not be able to offload the property, because they will have to take a loss on the property because the cap rate went up and the buyer will not be able to afford the asking price at the 6-7% interest that is currently at in Jan of 2023. Nor will a lending institution lend Grade A money on grade B or C property.
2. Banks are in major trouble. the lending institutions that made riskier loans are about find out where their weak links are located. if borrowers did not lock their interest rates down the borrower and the lender are about to be at odds. This goes for people who took out a home equity line of credit out on their primary residence to buy some thing stupid like an expensive car, boat, girlfriend whatever. typically HELOCs are floating rates (not always) but most of the time. Banks are businesses and make their profit on the spread. Just like your market makers in trading. So the spread is the difference between the interest rate the bank has with the federal reserve and the interest rate you the consumer are willing to pay for the loan. example: if the FFR is 6% then the bank is going to charge you (typically around 2% over the FFR) 8% on a mortgage, car loan, whatever loan product. if you lock your interest rate down at 8 % you're good, but if not you're in trouble.
Why?
3. Going back to the business part and the mortgage part. all the buyers and refi-ers that locked down at 3% are staying where they are at. the mentality is "why pay more for the same amount of house or the same house" So new home loans and refinances (the banks cash cow) are drying up. So how does a business survive the drought? they take their floating loans and shoot the rate sky high. to make up for the loss volume of new loans. Commercial Loans, HELOCs, HEILs, Refinances. The potential problem with this is the borrower accounted for the interest at the stated rate of lets say 3-5 percent. 3 percent everything is good, 5 percent the family is eating butterless toast. Well the contract states the bank can charge you up to (example) 20% on the loan after a seasoning period. on a 30 year 100k$ loan thats $20,000 dollars. so now the loan is 120k$ and the loan payment went from 286$ to 341$ naturally a 20% increase on your payments. Now I know alot of people are excited about mortgage rates coming down, but im not sure this is a good thing. i havent seen the paper on these loan products but im guessing one of two things
A) these are floating ARMs (adjustable rate Mortgages)
B) the banks are getting desperate for business. the FED doesnt control mortgages (YET) its up to the individual banks that borrow from the fed. The fed charges them the borrowing bank the FFR its up to the borrowing bank to decide what to do with cost they can either eat it and absorb the cost or they pass it on to the consumer. so when i hear mortgage rates being 6% or 7% which is near the current FFR its telling me the banks are trying to drum up business. it is by no means a good thing like i keep seeing.
4. Commercial loans are the same way. instead of giving the business the loan based on the borrowers position they are based off the businesses health and business plan. and the terms are a bit different. in commercial loans you have what they call balloon payments and thats when the loan matures. the balloon is typically 5-7 years and again rates can fluctuate. But to make the payments more affordable they lock you in at a payment rate of typically 20 -25 years but could go high as 30 years and even better they're typically interest only loans. So an example of this is on a 100K loan at a 20 year payment rate at 3% with a 5 year balloon youre only paying like 12$ month to month but at the the end of 5 years you have to pay back the entire 100K$. so, that leaves the business a few options to either refinance or liquidate. Now this is not all commercial loans but the ones im familiar with are like this, so if you're holding any businesses in your paper portfolio you need to be paying super close attention to their 10Ks and 10Qs, because a lot of businesses in-cooperated either the influx of cash or lack thereof during this weird COVID time. So if you're seeing their assets drop and their debt rise or maintain or even drop it means the business is selling off its assets to meet these increasing loan demands or even worse their taking new loans to pay off old loans.
5. the fed is in charge of the employment rate as well. kind of odd or counterintuitive to be frank on the matter. but it does kind of make sense. when you look at #4 you can see where the problems start to arise. once the businesses start to liquidate their physical plants they begin to square off the excess fat to bridge the gap. so all unnecessary employees and departments begin to get cut. So when you look at the unemployment rate i think every percent is a million people. So, when you hear things like 4% or 5% unemployment its basically saying 4,000,000 or 5,000,000 people are unemployed. the FED has stuck hard and fast on keeping inflation at 2% its in Powell's speeches on the FEDs website the writing is on the wall in essence. He has also been quoted to be unhappy with the employment rate and wanting higher unemployment.
6. Student loan bubble. I dont know how this is not being discussed in major outlets. But we have a major student loan bubble on our hands here in the states. the problem arises with the issue of the recession we are currently in at the moment. I whole heartedly believe that the US is in a period of Stagflation. productivity has leveled off or dropped off and prices are increasing. The problem arises (as i have said in prior posts before) is the last recession of 2008 businesses never really increased wages after that period i believe out of fear. they learned they can suppress wages and increase productivity so there is no need to increase wages if we can get more for less right? SO, we have kids leaving university with degrees and student loans with the promises of better paying jobs than their vocational trained counter parts, and the plan back fired. students are graduating university and taking jobs that are paying the same amount that a high school drop out is getting payed. (with the exception of STEM based degrees) Why? Because of wage suppression and the older work force staying in the work force longer locking up those higher paying positions due to inflation. So, these kids are forced to take lower paying jobs, live with their parents, and then 6 months later the bill is due for the loans.
Im no conspiracy theorist im just a trader that uses a highly debated technique of trading, but if you just remove yourself and look at the bigger picture its clear to see that the world is moving toward a centralized economy. it will probably be a digital one that the central planners can control so they can limit the funds available to their opposition. AKA the FEDcoin. a digital dollar is a terrible idea. but thats a post for another time.
long story short the pattern is a bearish butterfly. with all the fundamentals listed above with the rising interest rates i see the dollar gaining strength and in essence following this pattern and coming down over the long haul.
thanks for reading my conspiracy! if youre a homeowner lock your mortage rate if you can or pay to lock the rate. even if its 1% or 2% higher than it is currently i dont see the FED slowing down until we get under 5% inflation (if the US government doesnt change the items listed in the CPI)
Recession
Fundamental and Technical Analysis | January week 2, 2023Table of Content:
1. The World Bank
2. Jerome Powell
3. Mass Layoffs
4. Corporate Headline
5. Technical
1. The World Bank
The World Bank has recently announced a slash in the forecast for global growth. This year's global growth forecast is reduced by nearly half, to just 1.7%, from its previous projection of 3%. It would be the third-weakest annual expansion in three decades, behind only the deep recessions that resulted from the 2008 global financial crisis and the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. “For most of the world economy, this is going to be a tough year, tougher than the year we leave behind,” Georgieva said. “Why? Because the three big economies — U.S., EU, China — are all slowing down simultaneously.” Furthermore, The World Bank projects that the European Union’s economy won’t grow at all next year after having expanded by 3.3 percent in 2022. It foresees China growing 4.3 percent, nearly a percentage point lower than it had previously forecast and about half the pace that Beijing posted in 2021.
2. Jerome Powell
In a recent statement led by Jerome Powell, he expressed his highest level of hawkish sentiment towards the economy. He noted that inflation is the foundation of a healthy economy and can require the central bank to take actions that are not necessary, but popular. Price stability is the bedrock of a healthy economy and provides the public with measurable benefits over time. But restoring price stability when inflation is high can require measures that are not popular in the short term as we raise interest rates to slow the economy.” He wants to resolve the issue he initially created, previously, he was insistent that inflation was going to be transitory and now there is a clear indication that it is not and will require major efforts to bring it down.
Why was Powell hawkish?
Financial conditions are unintentionally loosening and he does not want to see it because that will increase the probability of a rebound in markets which could mean a rebound in inflation.
- Some of the world’s largest asset managers such as BlackRock Inc., Fidelity Investments and Carmignac are warning markets are underestimating both inflation and the ultimate peak of US rates, just like a year ago. (Bloomberg)
- “Central banks are unlikely to come to the rescue with rapid rate cuts in recessions they engineered to bring down inflation to policy targets. If anything, policy rates may stay higher for longer than the market is expecting,” a team of analysts including Jean Boivin, the head of the Institute, wrote last week. BlackRock is underweight developed market equities and it prefers investment-grade credit to long-term government bonds.
- JP Morgan CEO, Jamie Dimon said Tuesday that the Federal Reserve may need to raise interest rates to 6% to fight inflation, which would be higher than most are expecting this year.
3. Mass Layoffs
In order to bring down inflation, the Federal Reserve needs to slow down the economy. It is common sense to see that an economy will not go down until consumers stop spending which results in loss of employment.
- One of Wall Street's biggest banks plans to lay off up to 3,200 employees this week, as it faces a challenging economy, a downturn in investment banking, and struggles in retail banking. It is one of the biggest rounds of layoffs at Goldman since the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Goldman Sachs is having difficulties in the stock market, underperforming.
- Bed Bath & Beyond reported a net loss for the quarter ending Nov. 26, 2022, of $393 million. That's a widening of 29.7% from the $276.4 million loss in the comparable quarter of 2021. Furthermore, the Q3 loss is worse than the retailer's projection last week of a $385.8 million loss. These inadequate results will lay off hundreds or thousands of employees in the company. On the other hand, the stock rallied by double digits, emphasizing again that the stock market likes when employees get fired to increase profit margins.
- Coinbase announced Tuesday that it was laying off 950 people, about 20% of its staff. The job cuts come only a few months after another major round of layoffs. The crypto brokerage firm let 1,100 people go in June, about 18% of its headcount at the time. Again, the stock still rallied by double digits. It is notable to mention that the brother of the former Coinbase product manager, Nikhil Wahi, was sentenced Tuesday to 10 months for his role in a scheme to trade on confidential information about when the cryptocurrency exchange was going to list new tokens.
A comparable phenomenon I start to visualize from these and recent layoffs is the 2021 stock splits. When firms announced stock splits in 2021, their stock would surge. In 2023, when a company announces layoffs, the stock surges higher (until they run out of liquidity).
4. Corporate Headline
- The cyclical growth rebound, possibly triggered by the Chinese reopening, is being priced in or could go higher (major resistance at SPX $4,250). Macau sees deserted streets and Casinos after reopening (Reuters).
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. recorded its first quarterly revenue miss in two years, signaling the global decline in electronics demand is starting to catch up with the chip giant (Bloomberg). This issue will take months to recover as it has to adapt to the oversupplied market.
- Apple is Broadcom’s largest customer and accounted for about 20% of the chipmaker’s revenue in the last fiscal year, amounting to almost $7 billion to stop buying key components, and instead, produce pieces themselves.
- Blackstone Inc. lost a bid to end rent stabilization at Manhattan's largest apartment complex after a judge ruled in favor of tenants at Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village.
- Wells Fargo, once the No. 1 player in mortgages, is stepping back from the housing market. This is a negative signal for the housing market, prices are too high and few can afford these houses. Once homeowners realize the Fed is not going to ease interest rates anytime soon, the housing market is going to slow down dramatically and individuals are going to lose their homes. Renters and Airbnb will slow down real estate further as they will not be able to pay their mortgages and will be forced to get rid of the houses, greatly increasing the supply.
5. Technical Analysis
- Momentum indicators: RSI and MACD moving toward positive momentum and volume remains below average (bullish).
- If S&P500 breaks the sloping resistance (channel), prices will rise significantly as individuals will assume the market is already priced-in, plus, showing: a break in pattern resistance; higher-low; and bear market sentiment reducing.
- This is a similar pattern to the 2000 market crash where SPX broke a major trend and resistance, then followed to fall 34%.
I point out the negative indication in most of my recent analyses, this is because the negative indications are far greater than any positive singular indication in this market environment.
Overall, I have not changed my outlook and I am keeping my government bonds. I will take the opportunity of a rise in equity markets to short BTC at higher levels.
LONG WAY TO THE BOTTOMMy theory is that we have a long way to go to reach the bottom of the market SP:SPX . Based on my previous post, which I have linked, we would have to reach some sort of support before coming back up.
The current price I'm looking at is $2,191.86 . From the all time high in 2022 of $4,818.62 to that price is a 54% drop. See that the drawdowns of the past few recessions have been around 50%.
This gives me more confirmation that my theory is true and we shall see how long this winter lasts!
Yellow Gold Rises (Then Falls) (Then Rises Again)As mentioned in my last idea on the subject, Gold is poised to rise dramatically in 2023 due to an upcoming liquidity event.
Gold is a useful coincident indicator when used in conjunction with the USD.
When Gold/USD are negatively correlated, it generally means there's a loosening of financial conditions for whatever reason (e.g., central banks selling dollars to buy gold, credit becoming more available, government sending cheques).
When Gold/USD are positively correlated, it generally means there's a tightening of financial conditions due to uncertainty in the monetary system (e.g., flight to safety, store of value).
What are the charts suggesting now?
First, the dollar has been rising fast and hard since Q2 2021 up +28% in more than a year. It then reversed course in Q4 2022 falling -10%.
This is not at all unusual. Often the dollar falls in Q4 due to seasonal market dynamics. And when it does, it then retraces the entire drop and more in Q1.
As you might imagine, that could be hard on liquidity sensitive assets. Yet gold is interesting in this regard. If the liquidity shock is presaging something more nefarious, such as a global event or credit crisis, then Gold's fall pivots on a dime and the price rockets upwards.
So these are the warning signs I'd be watching for:
A sharp bounce in the DXY here (or as low as 97)
A pullback on Gold to $1,730 (or as low as $1,510)
A pivot in Gold so it rises with DXY
Seeing this play out means that Gold is going to new highs... and that we're in a recession that gets deeper and more painful as the dollar rises.
Nonfarm Payrolls Effect on Gold PriceOANDA:XAUUSD
Key Economics Highlight in the first week of 2023 - Nonfarm Payrolls and Unemployment Rate for December 2022 were reported on 6th January 2023.
- Nonfarm payrolls increased by 223,000 which is higher than what the market was expecting by 200,000.
- The unemployment rate fell to 3.5%, which was lower than the consensus of 3.7%.
On the night of January 6, 2023, this report had a significant positive impact on various financial assets especially Gold. Gold prices rose from 1,836 USD to 1,850 USD within 10 minutes of the reporting and it made a higher high on the weekly candle at 1,869.9 USD before closing the week at 1,866.1 USD
Technically, Gold price almost reach its significant supply zone at around 1876.5 USD. Therefore, it would not be surprising to see the gold price drops to the first support level or trade in the range of 1825 - 1876 for a while.
Fundamentally, the current US workforce participation rate still has not reached the Pre-Covid19 level and the contribution of workforce participation in US consists more aging population which could be problematic for future economy growth as there could be more labor demand but less supply since more people are going into being retired.
Therefore, it seems like the market has overreacted to this report in short term. But, speculators and investors must still continue to manage their risks based on the inflation rates and potential recession of US economy
Let us know what you guys think!~
The Misconceptions of a 'FED Pivot'Investors often want the Federal Reserve (also known as “The Fed”) to pivot its monetary policy because it can potentially have a significant impact on financial markets. A pivot refers to a change in the direction of monetary policy, such as shifting from tightening (e.g., raising interest rates) to easing (e.g., lowering interest rates).
When The Fed pivots towards easing, it can signal to investors that it is willing to support economic growth and potentially stimulate asset prices. This can lead to increased demand for stocks and other riskier assets, as investors expect that these assets will benefit from the supportive monetary policy.
However, it’s important to note that The Fed’s pivot does not always have the intended effect on financial markets.
For example;
1. In 2000, the Fed implemented QE in response to the dot-com bubble burst and the subsequent economic downturn. This policy involved the purchase of longer-term Treasury securities in order to lower longer-term interest rates and stimulate economic growth.
2. In 2007, the Fed implemented QE in response to the global financial crisis. This policy involved the purchase of a variety of securities, including mortgage-backed securities and longer-term Treasury securities, in order to lower longer-term interest rates and stimulate economic growth.
3. In 2020, The Fed pivoted towards a more accommodative stance in its monetary policy in response to the economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
In conclusion, investors may want The Fed to pivot towards easing in the hope that it will stimulate economic growth and support asset prices. However, it’s important to recognize that The Fed’s actions do not always have the desired effect on financial markets, and there are many other factors that can influence stock prices.
BUT. As an investor, there are a few things you can do while waiting for the Federal Reserve to pivot its monetary policy:
- Stay informed: Keep track of economic and market developments, as well as statements and actions by The Fed. This can help you understand the current economic environment and how The Fed might be considering changing its monetary policy.
- Diversify your portfolio: Consider spreading your investments across a range of asset classes and sectors, as this can help reduce risk and potentially provide more stable returns over time.
- Have a long-term investment horizon: The Fed’s pivot may have an immediate impact on financial markets, but it’s important to remember that the long-term prospects of investment are generally more important than short-term movements. By having a long-term investment horizon, you can potentially ride out any short-term market volatility caused by a pivot in The Fed’s monetary policy.
- Review your risk tolerance: Make sure that your investment portfolio is aligned with your risk tolerance and financial goals. If you are a risk-averse investor, you may want to allocate a larger portion of your portfolio to safer investments such as cash or bonds.
- Seek professional advice: If you are unsure about how to navigate the investment landscape, consider seeking the advice of a financial advisor or professional. They can provide personalized guidance based on your specific investment goals and risk tolerance.
The Misconceptions of a FED Pivot...Investors often want the Federal Reserve (also known as "The Fed") to pivot its monetary policy because it can potentially have a significant impact on financial markets. A pivot refers to a change in the direction of monetary policy, such as shifting from tightening (e.g., raising interest rates) to easing (e.g., lowering interest rates).
When The Fed pivots towards easing, it can signal to investors that it is willing to support economic growth and potentially stimulate asset prices. This can lead to increased demand for stocks and other riskier assets, as investors expect that these assets will benefit from the supportive monetary policy.
However, it's important to note that The Fed's pivot does not always have the intended effect on financial markets.
For example;
1. In 1986 , the Federal Reserve implemented a form of quantitative easing (QE) known as the Treasury-Fed Accord. This policy involved the Fed purchasing large amounts of U.S. Treasury securities in order to lower long-term interest rates and stimulate economic growth.
2. In 1989 , the Fed implemented another round of QE in response to a slowdown in economic growth. This time, the Fed focused on purchasing mortgage-backed securities in order to lower mortgage rates and support the housing market.
3. In 2000 , the Fed implemented QE in response to the dot-com bubble burst and the subsequent economic downturn. This policy involved the purchase of longer-term Treasury securities in order to lower longer-term interest rates and stimulate economic growth.
4. In 2007 , the Fed implemented QE in response to the global financial crisis. This policy involved the purchase of a variety of securities, including mortgage-backed securities and longer-term Treasury securities, in order to lower longer-term interest rates and stimulate economic growth.
5. In 2020 , The Fed pivoted towards a more accommodative stance in its monetary policy in response to the economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
In conclusion, investors may want The Fed to pivot towards easing in the hope that it will stimulate economic growth and support asset prices. However, it's important to recognize that The Fed's actions do not always have the desired effect on financial markets, and there are many other factors that can influence stock prices.
BUT .. As an investor, there are a few things you can do while waiting for the Federal Reserve (The Fed) to pivot its monetary policy:
- Stay informed: Keep track of economic and market developments, as well as statements and actions by The Fed. This can help you understand the current economic environment and how The Fed might be considering changing its monetary policy.
- Diversify your portfolio: Consider spreading your investments across a range of asset classes and sectors, as this can help reduce risk and potentially provide more stable returns over time.
- Have a long-term investment horizon: The Fed's pivot may have an immediate impact on financial markets, but it's important to remember that the long-term prospects of investment are generally more important than short-term movements. By having a long-term investment horizon, you can potentially ride out any short-term market volatility caused by a pivot in The Fed's monetary policy.
- Review your risk tolerance: Make sure that your investment portfolio is aligned with your risk tolerance and financial goals. If you are a risk-averse investor, you may want to allocate a larger portion of your portfolio to safer investments such as cash or bonds.
- Seek professional advice: If you are unsure about how to navigate the investment landscape, consider seeking the advice of a financial advisor or professional. They can provide personalized guidance based on your specific investment goals and risk tolerance.
Recession on the Horizon - FOMC and LayoffsYesterday, the FOMC confirmed the backing of higher interest rates for longer. The market reacted negatively signaling negative sentiment on rate expectations for the following quarters. Federal Reserve official, Neel Kashkari, who often has the most dovish views on market anticipation stated that inflation may have peaked but sees interest rates rising higher for the next few meetings. He sees the FED raising rates by a whole percentage point from the current level of 4.25%-4.5% to 5.4% (MarketWatch, Jan. 5). The inflation fight is not over yet, and it remains sticky despite all the economic weakening observed.
In a previous thesis where I challenged the US economy about a year ago, I warn of massive layoffs in 2023 despite most analysts and the Fed saying otherwise. Meta and Tesla have already laid off thousands of employees just months ago. Today, large layoffs in tech are happening with Salesforce: “layoff about 10% of its employees, the company also says it will close some offices as part of its recruiting plan, but it is still unclear if any of the bay area offices will be impacted, undertaking major cost cuts in a challenging economy.” (CNBC, Jan. 5). Amazon Chief Executive Andy informed his employees that the number of layoffs in the company has now been increased to more than 18000 roles (ArabianBusiness, Jan. 5). Other firms are cost cutting, most cutting employee benefits. It is just a matter of when or not we are going to see higher unemployment rates in 2023. The most obvious fundamental reason for these layoffs and cost cuts is the fact that all these companies responded to the “bubble” fueled by stimulus and extensive quantitative easing. As a response, the Fed is raising interest higher, and tightening the monetary policy and we see the equity evaluation of these companies dropping significantly. Eventually, that demand is gone, and these companies are left with thousands of employees hired in response to a "fake" demand, over-hired. As equity evaluation is going down, they have to improve the margins by laying off employees and reducing expenses since revenue is going down.
I see another reason for large layoffs, perhaps, a more IMPORTANT and IMMEDIATE aspect. Salesforce admitted business activities going down, demand slowing, and growth staggering, however, their stock went higher because they laid off employees, reducing their expenses. On paper, it shows higher margins, and thus, the stock reacted positively. What can become a norm during this economic environment is that we see more companies, especially in the tech industry which saw major lows, employing this technic by raising their stock prices with restructuring and engaging in mass layoffs.
My plan of limiting my exposure to risks has not changed. I am holding a majority in cash and short-term government bonds.
Looking to increase exposure to my trading in gold when the US 10-Year Real Rates falls from the inverse correlation between the two. Reminder: Higher real yields = expensive to hold gold when compared to other yielding investments such as fixed income, thus the inverse correlation on the charts.
This is for personal recording but feel free to comment and argue.
Which Forex trading opportunities could 2023 bring?Fundamentals drive the markets... Here is what we could see happen in 2023...
1. Inflation reversal - possible downside for the US Dollar. Rising inflation and inflation fears drove the USD higher in 2022. Now that inflation is coming down and is more under control, we could see USD downside throughout 2023.
2. Global recession trades - this is already priced in, as the recession has been so well broadcast over the last few months. What isn't priced in is if the recession doesn't happen or is much deeper than expected. Look out for opportunities on CHF and USD pairs - CHF and USD strength if the recession is worse than expected. The opposite if no recession crystallises in 2023 and if no recessions are expected in 2024.
3. Russia-Ukraine war escalation/de-escalation trades - hopefully, we see an end to this war. Either way, we could see EUR and USD pairs impacted. USD strength and EUR weakness, if there is escalation. The opposite if the war ends.
4. GBP recovery trades(?) - sterling is undervalued (it is looking cheap). Possible GBP upside throughout 2023, as stability returns to the UK. GBPCHF, GBPJPY and GBPUSD could provide strong upside opportunities, depending on the outcome of points 1 and 2 of this post.
Obviously, anything could happen - this is the current outlook as of 5th January 2023, things could look very different in a month!
Wishing you all the best for 2023!
Leading Indicators - PPI (PPIACO) vs. Unemployment (UNRATE) I wanted to highlight how the peak (downward move) in the Producer Price Index (PPIACO) typically corresponds with the trough (upward move) in the Unemployment Rate (UNRATE) (inverse correlation), as a period of Recession takes hold on the economy, & the financial markets.
I also wanted to compare the above correlation with cycle tops in WTI Crude Oil (WTISPLC) , & also with respect to the OECD Leading Indicators (USALOLITONOSTSAM) — as this helps to pinpoint some of the historic baseline(s) for predicting the peak &/or trough in the business vs. market (financial) cycles.
Here is the key for the attached chart(s):
Top Chart
Black Line (Unemployment Rate - UNRATE): *Black Vertical Dotted Line* = Recession Timing Trough
Blue Line (Producer Price Index - PPIACO): *Blue Vertical Dotted Line* = Recession Timing Peak
Orange Line (WTI Spot Crude - WTISPLC): *Orange Vertical Dotted Line* = Recession Timing Peak
Red Shaded Areas (Recession): Indicator via @chrism665
Bottom Chart
OECD Leading Indicators (USALOLITONOSTSAM): *Black Dashed Line* = Pre-Recession Indicator Peak
Green Horizontal Dotted Line = Expansion Baseline (100)
Orange Horizontal Dotted Line = Current Reading (98.62)
Red Horizontal Dotted Line = Danger Zone (<97)
Red Shaded Areas (Recession): Indicator via @chrism665
Looking at the larger picture of both charts, you can see that typically in previous periods of Recession you would see this flow of the signals (first to peak/trough, last to peak/trough):
Peak - OECD Leading Indicators (USALOLITONOSTSAM)
Trough - Unemployment Rate (UNRATE)
*Peak - Producer Price Index (PPIACO)*
*Peak - WTI Spot Crude (WTISPLC)*
*Note* - As you can see PPIACO & WTISPLC are very closely correlated as demand peaks out, you then see a shift downward in WTISPLC as this is a signal of the topping of economic growth.
Now let's dive close-up into each time period of recession, as we can see some linkages/similarities in the 1991, 2001, & 2009 recessions vs. the what is (likely) a 23' recession, depending how the economic , markets , & financial data plays out this upcoming year — potentially into 24'.
1991 Recession Timeline
Peak - OECD Leading Indicators (USALOLITONOSTSAM): July 1987
Trough - Unemployment Rate (UNRATE): Mar. 1989
Peak - Producer Price Index (PPIACO): Oct. 1990
Peak - WTI Spot Crude (WTISPLC): Nov. 1990
2001 Recession Timeline
Peak - OECD Leading Indicators (USALOLITONOSTSAM): Jan. 2000
Trough - Unemployment Rate (UNRATE): Apr. 2000
Peak - WTI Spot Crude (WTISPLC): Nov. 2000
Peak - Producer Price Index (PPIACO): Jan. 2001
2009 Recession Timeline
Trough - Unemployment Rate (UNRATE): May 2007
Peak - OECD Leading Indicators (USALOLITONOSTSAM): June 2007
Peak - WTI Spot Crude (WTISPLC): June 2008
Peak - Producer Price Index (PPIACO): July 2008
2023(24) Recession Estimated?
Peak - OECD Leading Indicators (USALOLITONOSTSAM): May 2021
Peak - Producer Price Index (PPIACO): June 2022
Peak - WTI Spot Crude (WTISPLC): June 2022
Trough - Unemployment Rate (UNRATE): Sept. 2022
What do you think about this macro analysis? Have we potentially been in a recession in 22' — or are we moving closer to higher unemployment (UNRATE) in 23' as the macro/market conditions worsen, & the Federal Reserve's tighter monetary conditions (liquidity & credit) take their toll on the economy? Let me know what you think in the comments below! 👇🏼
Bitcoin: Fear of recession taking over the MarketHey traders, in today's trading session we are monitoring BTCBUSD for a selling opportunity around 16900 zone, once we will receive any bearish confirmation the trade will be executed.
Trade safe, Joe.
XAUUSD CAN SHOW BIG BREAKOUT!Hi investors! afterwatching today's technicals, I concluded that, chart can show big breakout towards upside or downward !! A/C to me considering some fundamentals of todays market/world conditions & upcoming world recession, XAUUSD can FLY !!!!
LOOKING FOR BETTER POSITIONING.
S&P500 - Outlook - 2023 - 1st Week of January - 4 Hour ChartS&P500 Outlook for the 1st week of January 2023 on the 4 hour chart.
Looking for a minor high, or the beginning of a strong move to the downside to HEAVILY short the market within the first few days, or first trading week of January.
1) Always have your stop loss in place.
2) Always have your 'take-profit' target planned before entering.
3) Always be open to being wrong, and exit when the market is not heading in the anticipated direction.
S&P500 - Outlook - 2023 - 1st Week of January - 4 Hour ChartS&P500 Outlook for the 1st week of January 2023 on the 4 hour chart.
Looking for a minor high, or the beginning of a strong move to the downside to HEAVILY short the market within the first few days, or first trading week of January.
1) Always have your stop loss in place.
2) Always have your 'take-profit' target planned before entering.
3) Always be open to being wrong, and exit when the market is not heading in the anticipated direction.
S&P500 - Outlook - 2023 - 1st week of JanuaryS&P500 Outlook for the 1st week of January 2023.
Looking for a minor high, or the beginning of a strong move to the downside to HEAVILY short the market within the first few days, or first trading week of January.
1) Always have your stop loss in place.
2) Always have your 'take-profit' target planned before entering.
3) Always be open to being wrong, and exit when the market is not heading in the anticipated direction.
S&P500 - Outlook - 2023 - 1st Week of JanuaryS&P500 Outlook for the 1st week of January 2023.
Looking for a minor high, or the beginning of a strong move to the downside to HEAVILY short the market within the first few days, or first trading week of January.
1) Always have your stop loss in place.
2) Always have your 'take-profit' target planned before entering.
3) Always be open to being wrong, and exit when the market is not heading in the anticipated direction.
No doom, gloom or pivot. Just one aliens TA.An alien trader landed on earth and was given a chart of the combined** US indices (futures). Luckily, and not coincidentally, he knew TA.
He had never heard of people like J.Powell and J.Cramer, or places like China, Ukraine and Russia.
this is what he saw:
Bullish:
- Broke out 'above' the main diagonal trend (bullish)
- Made a Higher High (bullish)
- Note that, on a VERY high TF, the Bull market rides on and up (see "Higher Range Frame" box)
Neutral
- Has arrived at the key POC (neutral) and is sandwiched between zones of lower past volume (LVN's)
- The 100MA/400MA was moving towards a "neutral cross" (the midpoint between the MA's is flat and not changing)
Bearish
In higher time/range frames the index has not made a new swing high. (see "Higher Range Frame" box)
NOTES
**There are multiple ways to merge ES, NQ and YM, as well as alternative indices like $NYA and Wilshire 5000. The *best* option depends on what it is used for (ex. a sphere is a good model of the earth for the astronomer, but not for the mountain climber). A simple average (ES + NQ + YM)/3 is ruled out because one point has a different value for each index. To address this, each index is weighted so that a 1 point change will imply the same change in $ terms (For weights see www.barchart.com
Alternative criterion for weighting include capitalization, number of stocks and beta weighting.
[i Epilogue - After watching a TA channel on You Tube for 5 min. he departed abruptly pausing only to grab a clean towel. He is believed to be following in the dolphins footsteps.