Get started

Voippal

VPLM - Powerful Descending TriangleEvery time we have a consolidation this last year we end up breaking out on rumors, running up higher than necessary, then crashing back down on GOOD NEWS. Last time it was a settlement issuance but things are in a NDA. There is an insider selling on this one but its very low of % compared to what the individuals own. We have a great descending triangle with lawsuits coming up in Oct. Dare I predict that we will soon again have rumors of something? This would match well with the descending triangle and the volume that is coming in as of late. Did I mention we also have a nice hammer candle on daily and 3 day? Regarding recent news (via yahoo): The cases vs Verizon and T-Mobile continue to move forward with trials scheduled in October. “This is all very good news!” said Emil Malak, CEO of VoIP-Pal. “Our team is very pleased with our progress to this point. As a result of the termination of the section 101 motions in NDCAL and 8 IPR’s, we have managed to consolidate our many legal battles and can focus our resources and efforts towards getting to the finish line. We can now see a clear path to what we hope will be a fair resolution for all our shareholders. Patience is a virtue.” Not financial advice, DYOR
OTC:VPLMLong
by ChartProphet
VPLM Bullish AF- STOCKTWITS STRONG BUY!!! TODASO!I have anchored the FIB from the breakout earlier his year and then included the wick at the top. I have Vwap anchored to weekly and it's nice how all these level have similar confluence. We have a pennant which is neutral but it's also a bull flag as well. The flag pole gives us the extrapolation for a target above. Fib levels, vwap and 200ema etc for lower targets. Not financial advice, DYOR. From Stocktwits History101 Yesterday 7:09 PM $VPLM for all the new visitors to the VPLM board, welcome. I thought I'd re-post some info to get you up to speed (several posts below). Summary: VPLM has been defending its patents against multiple HUGE tech company infringers for 10+ years. Google, Samsung, Tmobile, Meta, Amazon, etc. VPLM has been winning over & over again, in court and at the patent board. It is the 9th inning now, with court dates set for this summer IN WACO TEXAS, a court (and jury) that supports patent property rights. The big boys are in a big bind, and we investors might have a decent shot at some real $$. Not investment advice, GLTA From investorshub.advfn.com GreenBackClub Re: None Tuesday, January 24, 2023 7:01:49 PM Post# 112387 of 113349 FOR ANYONE CLAIMING THAT VPLM HAS NOT DONE ANYTHING MEANINGFUL FOR THE COMPANY AND SHAREHOLDERS I OFFER THIS LIST OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY VPLM THUS FAR: * Up-listed from OTC-PINK to OTCQB * Removed the DTC Chill * Conducted an annual financial audit to be in full SEC compliance and fully reporting. * Conducted an initial damages analysis for RBR parent patent. * Initiated 4 federal infringement lawsuits to enforce VPLM's IP rights against Verizon, Apple, AT&T, Twitter. * Initiated 1 federal infringement lawsuit to enforce VPLM's IP rights against Amazon. * Agreed to having all 5 cases venue transferred to Northern California and consolidated for pre-trial purposes. * Defended and defeated 8 IPR petitions brought before the PTAB by Unified Patents, Apple and Verizon/ATT. * Successfully defeated a motion, in part, for sanctions by Apple at the PTAB. * Successfully defeated an Alice motion brought by Verizon & ATT. * 27 total patents granted and issued as of February 2019 (21 U.S. Patents). * Granted RBR patent in Europe without any opposition challenge within 9 month challenge period. * successful efforts to recoup most of the 100 million shares from Richard Kipping et al * Upgraded the Board of Directors to include new members with extensive experience in M&A. * Brought on board new boutique NYC law firm (Kevin Malek) to go to battle against the big silicon defendants. * Brought on board terrific superstar lawyer in luis Hudnell - ceo malak returned many hundreds of millions of shares back to the treasury to reduce the outstanding share count (to the benefit of shareholders) And more recently……. ***Patents have been validated*** ***Initial damages analysis done*** ***Defeated 12 more IPRS (20 total)** ***IPRs have been appealed and upheld unanimously*** ***No patents have been invalidated*** *** Current with all requisite filings*** ***current with prosecuting patents and keeping both parent and child patents current*** ***Reduction in OS count (thanks Emil!)*** ***Some claims (@20) invalidated for RBR but could be overturned with a decision on Axle at the Supreme Court*** ***NDCA is a very difficult court to win as it is defendant friendly. Waco is fair and plaintiff friendly*** ***Foot in the door in WACO and now some defendants must remain in Waco (Amazon’s writ of mandamus denied!) and face a trial. Other defendants currently stayed in NDCA are tied to Waco results*** ***Albright is a judge that is perceived as fair, by the books and fast which means vplm will be given a fair chance to argue / defend patents on the merits (all we could ask for)*** ***99% of Albright's cases settle before trial. Albright encourages settlement ALL THE TIME. If defendants get to trial they have been given multiple chances to settle so they can’t expect Leniency from judge Albright*** ***Defendants are NOT working together as a formal consolidated group. There is a disconnect - which plays into VPLM’s favor*** ***Most big defendants will settle before providing source code when discovery is requested and required. Vplm is well into discovery phase so it is only a matter of when and not if source code will be demanded*** ***Apple's own expert admitted in court in virnetx case - on the record - that they use relays to route their calls (imessage, facetime, etc.). This admission will come to bite the apple in the butt*** ***Apple tried to file a patent when VPLM was updating their RBR child patent but they failed to do so before VPLM did. We were first to file at USPTO. Now why did they do this? --> because they wanted to get around infringing. Sorry apple, you lose again*** ***60+ companies have received letters that notified them of possible infringement AND offered them the chance to take a license. This was years ago. Willful infringement equals treble damages!*** ***Apple and others can be brought back into litigation as they were dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE***
OTC:VPLMLong
by ChartProphet
This Penny Stonk Owns More Patents Than You Can CountVoip Pal is a true underground penny stock secret with lawsuits against major companies such as Apple, Twitter, Verizon, AT&T and many others. 60 large companies have violated patents held by this little know company that has been running voice over internet protocols. It's hard to use "ANY" VOIP technology that is not owned by Voip Pal or in volation of their many patents. NFA, DYOR www.voip-pal.com About Voip-Pal.Com Inc VoIP-Pal.Com Inc. is a development stage voice-over-Internet protocol re-seller, and a provider of a transactional billing platform tailored to the points and air mile business, and a provider of anti-virus applications for smartphones. The Company owns a portfolio of issued patents in various technology areas, including classification and routing of communications over different networks and over geographically distributed nodes; lawful intercept of such communications; enhanced emergency calling support; mobile gateways; uninterrupted transmission during endpoint changes; and metering and billing, including the reselling of white label telecommunication services. Its subsidiary includes Digifonica International (DIL) Limited, which provides solutions for various areas of Internet connectivity. In order to properly test the applications, it builds and operates three production nodes in Vancouver, Canada (Peer 1); London, United Kingdom (Teliasonera), and Denmark. WACO, Texas, Jan. 27, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- VoIP-Pal.com Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”, “Company”) (OTCQB: VPLM) announces that on January 20, 2022, the Company filed a petition for a Writ of Mandamus with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), challenging the decisions of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in a declaratory-judgment action filed by Twitter: Twitter, Inc. v. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc., No. 5:21-cv-02769. The case name and number for the petition is In re: Voip-Pal.com, Inc., No. 22-123.
OTC:VPLMLong
by ChartProphet
2