PROTECTED SOURCE SCRIPT
Buffett Quality Score [Energy]
Updated
The Buffett Quality Score for the Energy sector is designed to meticulously evaluate the financial health and quality of companies operating within this dynamic industry. Each selected financial ratio is specifically chosen based on its relevance and significance within the Energy sector context.
Selected Financial Ratios and Criteria:
1. Return on Assets (ROA) > 5%
2. Debt to Equity Ratio < 1.0
3.Interest Coverage Ratio > 3.0
4. Gross Margin % > 25%
5. Current Ratio > 1.5
6. EBITDA Margin % > 15%
7. Altman Z-Score > 2.0
8. EPS Basic One-Year Growth % > 5%
9. Revenue One-Year Growth % > 5%
10. Piotroski F-Score > 6
Score Interpretation:
Development and Context:
The selection and weighting of these specific financial metrics underwent rigorous industry-specific research to ensure their applicability and reliability within the unique operational environment of the Energy sector. This scoring framework aims to provide actionable insights for stakeholders navigating the complexities of Energy industry investments and operations.
Disclaimer: This information serves as an educational resource on financial evaluation methodology tailored for the Energy sector. It does not constitute financial advice or a guarantee of future performance. Consult qualified professionals for personalized financial guidance based on your specific circumstances and investment objectives.
Selected Financial Ratios and Criteria:
1. Return on Assets (ROA) > 5%
- Relevance: In the Energy sector, where asset-intensive operations are common (e.g., oil exploration and infrastructure), a robust ROA above 5% indicates efficient asset utilization, crucial for profitability.
2. Debt to Equity Ratio < 1.0
- Relevance: Energy companies often require substantial capital for projects and operations. A low Debt to Equity Ratio (<1.0) suggests prudent financial management with less reliance on debt financing, vital in a capital-intensive industry vulnerable to economic cycles.
3.Interest Coverage Ratio > 3.0
- Relevance: Given the capital-intensive nature of Energy projects, maintaining a healthy Interest Coverage Ratio (>3.0) ensures the company's ability to service debt obligations, particularly important during periods of economic volatility affecting commodity prices.
4. Gross Margin % > 25%
- Relevance: Energy companies face varying production costs and pricing pressures. A Gross Margin exceeding 25% reflects efficient cost management and pricing power, critical in mitigating volatility in commodity prices.
5. Current Ratio > 1.5
- Relevance: Energy projects often require substantial working capital. A Current Ratio > 1.5 indicates sufficient liquidity to cover short-term obligations, essential for operational continuity in an industry susceptible to market fluctuations.
6. EBITDA Margin % > 15%
- Relevance: Energy companies must manage operating costs effectively. An EBITDA Margin > 15% signifies strong operational efficiency and profitability, crucial for sustaining growth amidst market uncertainties.
7. Altman Z-Score > 2.0
- Relevance: The Energy sector experiences cyclical downturns and price volatility. An Altman Z-Score > 2.0 indicates financial stability and resilience, vital for weathering industry-specific challenges.
8. EPS Basic One-Year Growth % > 5%
- Relevance: Energy companies' earnings growth is closely tied to commodity prices and market demand. EPS growth > 5% indicates positive momentum and adaptability to industry shifts.
9. Revenue One-Year Growth % > 5%
- Relevance: Energy companies operate in a dynamic market influenced by geopolitical factors and global demand. Revenue growth > 5% reflects market adaptability and expansion potential.
10. Piotroski F-Score > 6
- Relevance: Fundamental strength is paramount in the Energy sector, characterized by capital-intensive projects. A Piotroski F-Score > 6 highlights solid operational and financial performance, critical for long-term sustainability.
Score Interpretation:
- 0-4 Points: Indicates potential weaknesses across critical financial areas, necessitating closer scrutiny.
- 5 Points: Suggests average performance based on industry-specific criteria.
- 6-10 Points: Signifies strong overall financial health and quality, aligning with the demanding requirements of the Energy sector.
Development and Context:
The selection and weighting of these specific financial metrics underwent rigorous industry-specific research to ensure their applicability and reliability within the unique operational environment of the Energy sector. This scoring framework aims to provide actionable insights for stakeholders navigating the complexities of Energy industry investments and operations.
Disclaimer: This information serves as an educational resource on financial evaluation methodology tailored for the Energy sector. It does not constitute financial advice or a guarantee of future performance. Consult qualified professionals for personalized financial guidance based on your specific circumstances and investment objectives.
Release Notes
Minor Update
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.