MSTR 200 or 190 very soonMSTR stock forum
MSTR 200 or 190 very soon
MSTR dumped during the cypto summit press conference.
MSTR happy with my short at around the 300 mark near open today. Trumps crypto order today should mark a minor high and things should crash from here with the rest of the market. If any stocks signal the craziness of a market bubble high this one has to be it. I still struggle to believe so many have bought into the concept. They will be bankrupt within a few years is my prediction. Stay safe!
MSTR will it fill the gap around 283?
MSTR Ok thank you
Let’s get back to business
BTCUSD MSTR 
COIN BITCOINI want to acknowledge that I wasn’t always so critical of Bitcoin. In fact, I once saw it as a groundbreaking innovation, with the potential to transform the world for the better. Like many others, I believed in its promises of decentralization, financial freedom, and democratization of wealth.
However, as I delved deeper into how Bitcoin actually works and what it truly represents, my initial enthusiasm gave way to growing skepticism. Over the years, I’ve dedicated significant time and effort to researching and studying it, analyzing its mechanics, ideology, and real-world implications. What I’ve come to realize is that Bitcoin resembles a digital finance version of Communism in several ways, and this comparison helps illuminate why it’s fundamentally flawed.
Both Bitcoin and Communism begin with utopian ideals—grand visions of equality, fairness, and freedom from centralized control. In Bitcoin’s case, it promises a decentralized financial system where no single entity has power and everyone can participate as equals. Similarly, Communism aims to abolish class distinctions and central authority, envisioning a society where everyone shares equally in the benefits of collective labor.
But here’s the core issue: neither system aligns with the realities of human behavior or the structure of the world we live in. In practice, Bitcoin, like Communism, has given rise to new forms of power concentration and exploitation. Despite its decentralized architecture, Bitcoin mining, governance, and wealth distribution are anything but equitable. Mining is dominated by a handful of large corporations and individuals with access to immense computing power and cheap electricity. Wealth, too, is concentrated in the hands of a small elite—reports show that a significant percentage of Bitcoin is controlled by a tiny fraction of its users.
Much like Communism, Bitcoin creates a system where the idealistic rhetoric masks a very different reality: exploitation by those who are already well-positioned to capitalize on the system’s flaws. It serves to widen the wealth gap rather than close it, ensuring that the rich remain at the top while leaving the poorest further marginalized. Meanwhile, many Bitcoin enthusiasts operate under the illusion that they are participating in a revolutionary movement, unaware that the very system they champion perpetuates inequities and reinforces existing power dynamics.
The problem with utopian systems like Bitcoin isn’t that they’re inherently bad or born from ill intentions. The problem is that they are unrealistic—they can’t work in the complex, competitive, and deeply unequal world we live in. Instead of creating true freedom or fairness, they often end up becoming tools for exploitation, exacerbating the very issues they claim to solve. Just as Communism failed to deliver on its promises of equality and prosperity, Bitcoin, too, falls short of its vision of financial emancipation.
-Cas (please feel free to share)
MSTR Pavlov once studied a group of rats for behavior conditioning analysis and found fascinating results. He used 4 groups of rats and put each group into their own separate cages. His goal was to study the phycological and addictive effects of randomness and how it affects behavior.Each group of rats had a little bar in their cage that could be pressed to release a pellet of food for the rat, conditioning them to perform an action and be rewarded with a pellet.
Group 1 had to press the bar 1 time to receive a pellet. The rats in that cage all quickly learned they could press the bar and get a pellet anytime.
Group 2 had to press the bar twice within a 2 second time frame to get a pellet. It took them a little longer, but they soon learned the routine within a few days.
Group 3 was a bit more complicated. They had to press the space bar twice within 2 seconds, wait 5 seconds and then press the bar twice again withing 1 second to get a pellet. It took them a great deal longer, but within 2 weeks they had all figured out the routine on how to get a pellet and remained calm and socially cohesive.
Group 4 were RANDOMLY given a different strategy each day from groups 1-3 to receive a pellet in their cage for that day. They were the slowest to lean how to keep the pellets flowing because of the random nature, with each rat needing nearly a month to master all the routines. Each day it would take them a few hours to figure out the routine for the day. Again, the routine for the day was assigned randomly, with no pattern for the day being predictive prior to trying.
The experiment was allowed to run for six months, at which point the supply of pellets were removed from all 4 Groups.
Not surprisingly, Group 1 figured out within a day they had ran out of pellets and quickly gave up pressing the bar, only occasionally checking it. Rats in the cage remained mostly calm and remained socially close to one another.
It took Group 2 longer to figure out the pellet supply had ran dry. They checked more often to see if it was working again. Initially tensions amongst the rats were noticeably higher than Group 1, but they soon calmed, although they remained more socially fractured.
Group 3 was more frantic, checking every few minutes and tensions ran very high for each rat to get at the bar to try. This lasted for several days. But eventually they all accepted the pellet supply was gone and ignored the bar. Tensions remained very high, and they grew socially distant from one another. Groups 1 and 2 had learned long before Group 3.
Group 4 results were most fascinating. Due to the random nature of how they had to receive their pellets each day, they never figured out the pellet supply was dry. Tensions boiled over quickly and many nearly fought to the death to get to the bar in desperate attempts to get a pellet, shoving one another off the bar and trying repeatedly to get a pellet. This continued for a few weeks until eventually nearly all were either too weak or too injured to press the bar any longer. In the final days the most dominant male rat would stand for hours pressing the bar, trying all the combinations over and over and over. Eventually they all died from starvation.
Trading crypto is random by nature because fundamentals do not drive the price of the asset. It is rather driven by collective sentiment, which is random from day to day and even hour to hour. No one strategy works all the time.
It's like being in Group 4. Some days you get a pellet after trying different things, and some days you get a pellet on the first try. The random nature keeps you coming back for more to see what works.
Slot machines are designed to prey on this very same weakness in human nature. The allure of randomness is the most addictive, and sneaky, addiction of all. Seeing someone else get a "pellet" reinforces you to try even harder to get your own pellet.
Will you know when the pellets have ran dry? Or will you just keep trying....
BTCUSD MSTR COIN 
USDTUSDDid the Bitcoin circus 🎪 really think the U.S. government would funnel taxpayer money into propping up the Anonymous Bitcoin gurus, Whales, and Michael Saylor’s personal so-called 'fortune'?
A fortune that’s nothing more than a teetering pile of debt, borrowed cash, and bonds destined never to be repaid.
Saylor’s scam dwarfs every con ever pulled in plain sight, preying on the uninformed, miseducating them and luring them into a financial black hole. And yet, they cling to the delusion like it’s a lifeline, a collective case of Stockholm syndrome.
When the house of cards collapses and the corruption gets exposed, Michael Saylor, and Donald Trump and everyone involved will stand as the architects of a global financial disaster for everyone involved in crypto, leaving millions in ruins.