Get started
BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION COM USD0.0001 CL ABLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION COM USD0.0001 CL ABLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION COM USD0.0001 CL A

BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION COM USD0.0001 CL A

No trades
See on Supercharts
Overview Financials News
Ideas
Discussions Technicals Forecast Seasonals Bonds

0A4L trade ideas

An insider bought a large amount of stock.an insider bought a large amount of stock. Jeff Immelt, former CEO of GE, was the person who acquired 70,000 shares of stock at an average price of $14.86 per share for more than $1 million in purchases. The reason Immelt's purchase is so notable is because he is on the Board of Directors at Bloom Energy. As a board member, Immelt invariably gets inside information about the company's direction; the fact that he was bullish enough to put $1 million of his own money behind the company is seen as a good sign. www.fool.com 4-K sec fillings sec.report
NYSE:BE
by AlenCiken
BE to 12$seekingalpha.com They just made an agreement to form a cell powered ship to reduce carbon emissions. Thats awesome but when it will come true is a tough one. Long term this will probably be a good buy. My expectation for their next high is 12$. It rallied today and hopefully no one sells tomorrow but the volume increased today so that showed a nice interest. If it pulls back im looking for a bounce at 9.66 to see if it can hold as new support. If it holds and bounces back up then hopefully it can surpass its daily high (june 30th) at 11.07. Its a good stock and energy is always a good buy but I wouldnt hop in until we get that new support. Thats all though. Good luck trade smart this is not financial advice. I am new and I am learning. apologies if this does not come true :) also note not seeing any bullish patterns so that is why im waiting for a new support
NYSE:BE
by tunripboyo
Possible 2nd waive sell off?Were There Multiple Waves During The 1918 Influenza Epidemic? There were at least three distinct waves of influenza in 1918 and 1919, which killed an estimated 50 million people worldwide. The pandemic was simultaneous with World War I, and the war is believed to have spread the virus around the globe more quickly than it otherwise would have. The first wave began in March 1918 and eased by the summer. The second wave came in the fall, followed by a third wave during the winter and spring of 1919.The first wave “was not very deadly,” said J. Alexander Navarro, assistant director of the Center for the History of Medicine at the University of Michigan. “It was about as bad as ordinary strains of seasonal influenza that had been circulating up until that point.” The second wave was the deadliest, and that may have been due to mutations that increased the virus’s lethality, although scientists say this is speculative and that such mutations more typically take much longer to develop and spread. The second wave “slowed towards the end of November, in part because more stringent social distancing measures were put in place,” said Kenneth Davis, author of “More Deadly Than War: The Hidden History of the Spanish Flu and the First World War.” “When those were relaxed, a third wave commenced in the winter and spring of 1919.” The third wave lasted into early March, and some suggest there was a fourth wave during the winter of 1920. Each was less deadly than the one before it, Navarro said, although there were regional differences in severity. The decline in lethality after the second wave was probably shaped in part by the declining number of people who hadn’t already been infected, Navarro said. When infections in a population become sufficiently widespread, that can slow the further spread due to “herd immunity.How Much Can The 1918 Pandemic Tell Us About What To Expect Now? While both pandemics involved an easily transmissible respiratory disease, there are some important differences that make the 1918 pandemic less helpful in predicting the course of the novel coronavirus. One is that the 1918 outbreak involved influenza, which is caused by a different family of viruses than the coronavirus. This brings both good and bad news. On the positive side, the coronavirus appears to be much more stable than the influenza virus, and thus less likely to mutate into a more deadly variant, said Ravina Kullar, an infectious disease specialist and adjunct faculty member at UCLA. The coronavirus’s “spike protein,” which enables it to attach to human cells and attack them, appears to be especially resistant to mutation. On the downside, the coronavirus doesn’t seem to have a significant seasonal aspect. Influenza worsens as the weather gets colder but eases up during the warmer months. While we may have seen a reduction in coronavirus infections in recent weeks because more human interactions are moving outdoors, scientists don’t expect the same scale of seasonal drop-off for the coronavirus. “What we’re seeing right now is that it’s not impacted by the climate,” Kullar said. “Warm and humid places like Mumbai and Indonesia have struggled with the virus, and in the United States, cases are rising in hot states like Arizona and Florida.” The patterns in mutations and seasonality suggest that the coronavirus may not follow the wave patterns of the 1918 flu. Instead, the spread of the coronavirus may follow something more like a plateau, with spikes possible if social distancing isn’t adhered to fully. There are other differences between now and 1918. On the upside, we now know much more about viruses and public health, and science is able to devise targeted treatments and vaccines. On the other hand, the world’s population is bigger and more densely packed. In 1918, the world’s population was smaller than 2 billion, while today it’s about 7.6 billion. Today, we also have commercial aviation, which can carry infected people around the world far faster than trains and ships could in 1918. A bigger, denser, more mobile population means a greater chance for a virus to continue spreading. In 1918, some cities saw an easing of the pandemic once they neared herd immunity, but that’s not going to be as helpful with the coronavirus. Because the coronavirus is more infectious than the 1918 virus, the percentage of the population needed to reach herd immunity has to be about 65% today, compared with about 35% in 1918. “In 1918, they could get through the pandemic more quickly because of that, and even so, they did it with a staggering death toll,” Navarro said. “Today, the coronavirus will be with us for a lot longer.” What Factors Could Cause A New Wave? The biggest risk, scientists say, is a loosening of social distancing measures. A much larger portion of the economy today is engaged in consumer-driven commerce such as the restaurant and entertainment sector. This heightens the economic pressure to relax social distancing standards. But doing so could worsen the pandemic. “In 1918, once measures were lifted, the population very quickly went back to life as normal, flocking to movies, shops and stores, dance halls and saloons,” Navarro said. “That led to another spike of cases in many cities.” Nichols said a community’s past experience with the virus can make a difference. In Boston, where Nichols is based, “the first wave was relatively severe, and many people know someone who was personally affected by COVID or had a COVID-related death in the family,” she said. “That affects people’s behavior. In areas where epidemic growth has been slow, the urgency of changing one’s behavior is less.” Nichols added that experiencing the summer, when people have the freedom to interact outdoors, could make it harder to practice social distancing in the colder months. “I fear that people will continue their summer socializing patterns into the fall and winter, turning very low-risk interactions into relatively high-risk interactions,” she said.
NYSE:BE
by RotanimreT
Bloom Energy LONG; $14 TGT - July 2020 Bloom Energy is set to take off. Again, in 2019, California legacy utility Pacific Gas & Electric, or PG&E, failed to prevent wildfire outbreaks due to their aging infrastructure. Though Californians, and most Americans, have speculated that the company will solve their repeated issues -- they haven't even though they are desperately trying to. That can only mean one thing: that the PG&E electricity infrastructure is far too expansive for the company to monitor or repair. Furthermore, it is too expensive and inconceivably labor intensive for PG&E to commission a taskforce to repair every short circuit or wiring issue present in their infrastructure otherwise they would have done so by now. It has made many, universities, schools, businesses, major facilities that require power around the clock, that grid power is far too unreliable. Enter Bloom Energy (BE), the company that provides versatile, natural gas-powered fuel cells that are connected to the grid yet independent from it. California and New York happen to be their largest markets! When the power goes out/a part of the grid crashes/a power line in your area fails, the Bloom Energy (BE) servers will supplement the lack of electricity, generate its own, and power your facility. This fire fiasco has driven a 5x increase in inquiries for Bloom Energy (BE) servers and will drive a backlog going into FY2020. This is a major secular trend for the company that has been, thus far, stymied with legal issues and high research and development/overhead costs. Not only that, they have been developing servers to cut emissions for large ships, a major source of greenhouse gases, and now have a major client in Samsung. BE is set to go sky high! PRICE TGT: $14 by July 2020
NYSE:BELong
by aayushdave
5
Trade the gap in Bloom EnergyAverage analysts price target $11.86 | Overweight 23% short interest Bloom Energy Corp. engages in the manufacture and installation of on-site distributed power generators. Its product, Bloom Energy Server, converts standard low-pressure natural gas or biogas into electricity through an electrochemical process without combustion. The company was founded by K. R. Sridhar, John Finn, Jim McElroy, Matthias Gottmann, and Dien Nguyen on January 18, 2001 and is headquartered in San Jose, CA.
NYSE:BELong
by DEXWireNews
1