summary comparing IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave, and PsiQuantum—covering key technology, funding, and commercialization details in table and bullet form.
Quick Overview
IonQ (IONQ) • Technology: Trapped-ion, universal gate-based. • Advantages: High-fidelity qubits, longer coherence times, fully connected architecture. • Status: Systems on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud. • Funding: $300–500M in cash (late 2023), burn of $20–30M/quarter. • Runway: Several years at current burn rate. • Use Cases: Machine learning, optimization, chemistry, finance, cryptography.
Rigetti (RGTI) • Technology: Superconducting, universal gate-based. • Advantages: Familiar chip-fab methods, large ecosystem synergy (similar to IBM/Google). • Status: Systems on Rigetti Quantum Cloud, AWS Braket, Azure Quantum. • Funding: Under 100M in cash, $20–30M+/quarter burn. • Runway: Shorter, relies on periodic capital raises and cost controls. • Use Cases: General-purpose quantum algorithms (though behind IBM/Google in scale/fidelity).
D-Wave (QBTS) • Technology: Quantum annealing (main) + in-development gate-based. • Advantages: Thousands of qubits for optimization tasks; real commercial customers. • Status: Annealing systems on D-Wave Leap, AWS Braket; gate-based still in R&D. • Funding: Tens of millions in cash, frequent financing. • Runway: Modest; offset partly by annealing revenue. • Use Cases: Optimization (supply chain, logistics, scheduling).
PsiQuantum (Private) • Technology: Photonic (light-based), universal gate-based, aiming for fault tolerance. • Advantages: Photons can have lower noise; targeting a million+ qubits with error correction. • Status: No public system yet, working with GlobalFoundries for chip production. • Funding: 700M–11B+ in venture capital from top investors. • Runway: Significant, but extremely high R&D costs. • Use Cases: Any universal quantum algorithm, once system is operational (late 2020s target).
Comparison Table
Category IonQ (IONQ) Rigetti (RGTI) D-Wave (QBTS) PsiQuantum (Private) Tech Approach Trapped-ion (gate-based) Superconducting (gate-based) Quantum annealing + gate-based R&D Photonic (gate-based) Key Advantages High fidelity, long coherence, connectivity Familiar chip fabrication Best for large-scale optimization, real commercial annealing use Photons more robust to noise; aiming for fault tolerance Challenges Scaling qubit counts, maintaining fidelity Competes with IBM/Google; shorter coherence times Annealing is not universal; gate-based still early Very complex optical alignment, no public system yet Commercial Availability Yes (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) Yes (Rigetti Cloud, AWS, Azure) Yes for annealing (Leap, AWS), gate-based not yet Not yet (research-focused, planned late 2020s) Cash Position (approx.) $300–500M Under 100M Tens of millions (needs frequent funding) 700M–11B+ from VCs Cash Burn Rate $20–30M/quarter $20–30M+/quarter High, partly offset by annealing revenue Not public, likely sizable Runway Several years Shorter, depends on raises Limited, reliant on new financing Large war chest but huge R&D Use Cases Broad quantum algorithms (ML, chemistry) Broad quantum algorithms, smaller scale Optimization (logistics, scheduling), exploring universal gate-based Universal fault-tolerant quantum (once built)
Key Takeaways • IonQ: Strongest public balance sheet among quantum pure-plays. Already offering universal gate-based computers via the cloud. • Rigetti: Similar universal approach (superconducting) but with tighter finances and tough competition from IBM/Google. • D-Wave: Leading in quantum annealing for optimization, has real customers, but gate-based progress is early. • PsiQuantum: Privately funded “moonshot” aiming for a million-qubit, fault-tolerant photonic system. High potential and high risk.
All data are approximate as of late 2023. Always check official disclosures for the most current figures.
CRVUSDT BlackRock has partnered with Curve Finance and Elixir
BlackRock's 533M BUIDL fund will access DeFi through the partnership with Curve Finance and Elixir. The collaboration allows up to 11B in institutional real-world assets to mint deUSD, a yield-bearing synthetic dollar by Elixir on Curve. In turn, RWA investors will have the ability to access new DeFi opportunities while keeping your existing real-world asset yields.
- Almost 11B in BTC ETF net inflows - BNB reaches ATH - ASTR Token burn proposal - FLOKI DWF Labs 12M - UNI Big announcement - PHB Phoenix GenAI - STRK ZK scaling to Bitcoin - VAI Countdown 6 days
SOLUSD Okay, this candlestick pattern is super bullish if we end up closing the 4h around this level ($142+). That bottom wick was super bullish all on its own. We seem to have retested the demand zone around $134-136, which lined up perfectly with the VWAP anchored to the local top. Probably going to clear 11B in volume on this candle, which is suggesting a lot of strength in this upward move.
If we manage to stay above $140 over the next few 4h candles, this is bullish as hell for the medium-term and probably the long term.